<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reputation Under Fire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/reputation_unde_1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/reputation_unde_1.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: m brerat</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/reputation_unde_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-64354</link>
		<dc:creator>m brerat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/09/reputation-under-fire.html#comment-64354</guid>
		<description>hey stalking is stalking.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey stalking is stalking&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Bellmore</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/reputation_unde_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-47557</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Bellmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/09/reputation-under-fire.html#comment-47557</guid>
		<description>You know, I followed that link, and find it really conspicuous that the reporter seems to have not made any efforts to confirm who was telling the truth; The adulterer, or the guy who lost his wife. The guy who admits to have seduced somebody else&#039;s wife, and broken up their marriage, is just assumed to be the one telling the truth.

Yeah, maybe he lost his reputation. Maybe he lost a &lt;i&gt;false&lt;/i&gt; reputation for being a decent human being... We don&#039;t know, and no reporter is going to raise a finger to find out.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I followed that link, and find it really conspicuous that the reporter seems to have not made any efforts to confirm who was telling the truth; The adulterer, or the guy who lost his wife. The guy who admits to have seduced somebody else&#8217;s wife, and broken up their marriage, is just assumed to be the one telling the truth.</p>
<p>Yeah, maybe he lost his reputation. Maybe he lost a <i>false</i> reputation for being a decent human being&#8230; We don&#8217;t know, and no reporter is going to raise a finger to find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

