<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Editions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/new_editions.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/new_editions.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:22:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/new_editions.html/comment-page-1#comment-47419</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 01:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/09/new-editions.html#comment-47419</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Kaimi. You didn&#039;t just get lucky ... you picked the right book from the start! And, of course, some of the best changes in the new edition were your suggestions or suggestions by other adopters.

Other casebook authors have told me that the move from the first to the second edition entails the biggest change in the life of a casebook. Of course, many books don&#039;t make it all of the way to the second edition, but those that do make it are going to reflect the suggestions of the users for the first time. We found those suggestions exceptionally helpful and responded accordingly.

By the second edition, if not before, the logic of the book is pretty well settled, and changes are driven more by changes in law than by new insights about the field. We expect to continue to receive feedback as we acquire more users, and some of that feedback will prompt us to change cases or problems, but I very much doubt that we will have another edition that requires as much work as this one did.

My experience with new editions of other books has generally been positive. I tend to prefer newer cases, so I appreciate the updates. Sure, new cases require new preparation, but often that results in new perspectives on the material, and I value that.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Kaimi. You didn&#8217;t just get lucky &#8230; you picked the right book from the start! And, of course, some of the best changes in the new edition were your suggestions or suggestions by other adopters.</p>
<p>Other casebook authors have told me that the move from the first to the second edition entails the biggest change in the life of a casebook. Of course, many books don&#8217;t make it all of the way to the second edition, but those that do make it are going to reflect the suggestions of the users for the first time. We found those suggestions exceptionally helpful and responded accordingly.</p>
<p>By the second edition, if not before, the logic of the book is pretty well settled, and changes are driven more by changes in law than by new insights about the field. We expect to continue to receive feedback as we acquire more users, and some of that feedback will prompt us to change cases or problems, but I very much doubt that we will have another edition that requires as much work as this one did.</p>
<p>My experience with new editions of other books has generally been positive. I tend to prefer newer cases, so I appreciate the updates. Sure, new cases require new preparation, but often that results in new perspectives on the material, and I value that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
