<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meatspaces, Cyberspaces, and (Relative) Expressive Freedom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/meatspaces_cybe.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/meatspaces_cybe.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Garfunkel</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/meatspaces_cybe.html/comment-page-1#comment-47165</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Garfunkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/09/meatspaces-cyberspaces-and-relative-expressive-freedom.html#comment-47165</guid>
		<description>Ok, I agree, but the intro is non-controversial. The reporter, (Anick Jesdanun) used the concept of a &quot;public park&quot; as an idealized free-speech oasis where time, space and manner restrictions don&#039;t apply. Had Jesdanun started, &quot;Your speech rights are haphazardly guaranteed in cyberspace, just as they are in semi-public real world spaces&quot; the reader would have probably come away from the article accepting the status quo.

I take issue with this stock cliche in paragraph 4: &quot;possible remedies, including government regulation, can be worse than the symptoms.&quot;

What are the possible remedies? None are listed. We can start with due process, which is what I called for with PONAR (&lt;a href=&quot;http://civilities.net/PONAR&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Protocol for Online Abuse Reporting&lt;/a&gt;). It&#039;s wrong for MySpace to contact GoDaddy to kill a domain, when the webmaster, by all indications from the article, would have been available to answer their request.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I agree, but the intro is non-controversial. The reporter, (Anick Jesdanun) used the concept of a &#8220;public park&#8221; as an idealized free-speech oasis where time, space and manner restrictions don&#8217;t apply. Had Jesdanun started, &#8220;Your speech rights are haphazardly guaranteed in cyberspace, just as they are in semi-public real world spaces&#8221; the reader would have probably come away from the article accepting the status quo.</p>
<p>I take issue with this stock cliche in paragraph 4: &#8220;possible remedies, including government regulation, can be worse than the symptoms.&#8221;</p>
<p>What are the possible remedies? None are listed. We can start with due process, which is what I called for with PONAR (<a href="http://civilities.net/PONAR" rel="nofollow">Protocol for Online Abuse Reporting</a>). It&#8217;s wrong for MySpace to contact GoDaddy to kill a domain, when the webmaster, by all indications from the article, would have been available to answer their request.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

