<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Franz Kafka&#8217;s Last Wishes and the Kafka Myths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/franz_kafkas_la.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/franz_kafkas_la.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/franz_kafkas_la.html/comment-page-1#comment-72943</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/09/franz-kafkas-last-wishes-and-the-kafka-myths.html#comment-72943</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re interested in the themes Hawes addresses, but disliked his tone and found that he goes overboard at times, I would suggest reading Milan Kundera&#039;s &quot;Testaments Betrayed.&quot; It was published more than a decade before Hawes&#039; book and while its focus is the development of the novel, he spends a lot of time discussing Kafka. He writes against &quot;Kafkology,&quot; the practice of critics and academics who study Kafka based more on biography than the broader context of movements such as Modernism, and who perpetuate Max Brod&#039;s saintly view of Kafka and misinterpretations of the meanings of Kafka&#039;s works. Kundera is quite harsh toward Brod. He admits we wouldn&#039;t have these great novels without Brod, but blames him for ruining Kafka analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re interested in the themes Hawes addresses, but disliked his tone and found that he goes overboard at times, I would suggest reading Milan Kundera&#8217;s &#8220;Testaments Betrayed.&#8221; It was published more than a decade before Hawes&#8217; book and while its focus is the development of the novel, he spends a lot of time discussing Kafka. He writes against &#8220;Kafkology,&#8221; the practice of critics and academics who study Kafka based more on biography than the broader context of movements such as Modernism, and who perpetuate Max Brod&#8217;s saintly view of Kafka and misinterpretations of the meanings of Kafka&#8217;s works. Kundera is quite harsh toward Brod. He admits we wouldn&#8217;t have these great novels without Brod, but blames him for ruining Kafka analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lior</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/franz_kafkas_la.html/comment-page-1#comment-47573</link>
		<dc:creator>Lior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 22:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/09/franz-kafkas-last-wishes-and-the-kafka-myths.html#comment-47573</guid>
		<description>Dan - Everything you say here is sensible and fair-minded. As you know, some of these points were widely understood before Hawes&#039;s book.  Let me just add two points that make things more complex.  First, we know that Kafka DID destroy the works he had access to while he was dying in a sanitarium. This suggests (but does not prove) a seriousness of purpose in his letters to Brod.  Second, Brod admitted - in the Forward to the Trial, I think - that because of the quality of the works, he would not have destroyed Kafka&#039;s work even if he was certain that Kafka wanted them destroyed.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan &#8211; Everything you say here is sensible and fair-minded. As you know, some of these points were widely understood before Hawes&#8217;s book.  Let me just add two points that make things more complex.  First, we know that Kafka DID destroy the works he had access to while he was dying in a sanitarium. This suggests (but does not prove) a seriousness of purpose in his letters to Brod.  Second, Brod admitted &#8211; in the Forward to the Trial, I think &#8211; that because of the quality of the works, he would not have destroyed Kafka&#8217;s work even if he was certain that Kafka wanted them destroyed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

