<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shake Down Entertainment, Ltd.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/shake_down_ente.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/shake_down_ente.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:31:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott D</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/shake_down_ente.html/comment-page-1#comment-48069</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/07/shake-down-entertainment-ltd.html#comment-48069</guid>
		<description>Thanks for expanding the scope of this quirky story.

I like your concept &quot;underlaw&quot; and the links to examples.  Drug-related conspiracy-making differs from most tax resisters as the concern is not &lt;i&gt; conceptual opposition to government but &lt;i&gt;resisting a specific action by government.

In any case, I have a new rationale for why this conspiracy has taken hold.  Could it be there is an inherent suspicion and backlash regarding Federal mandatory minimum sentencing or the experience of being told  while in prison that your charges change, switching to harsher federal punishments.

I am suggesting that certain types of underlaw spring forth from actual problems of law&#039;s legitimacy.  Exploring conspiracy theories in law, then, is akin to anthropology analyzing what cultural myths reflect about the world-view of the society.

&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for expanding the scope of this quirky story.</p>
<p>I like your concept &#8220;underlaw&#8221; and the links to examples.  Drug-related conspiracy-making differs from most tax resisters as the concern is not <i> conceptual opposition to government but </i><i>resisting a specific action by government.</p>
<p>In any case, I have a new rationale for why this conspiracy has taken hold.  Could it be there is an inherent suspicion and backlash regarding Federal mandatory minimum sentencing or the experience of being told  while in prison that your charges change, switching to harsher federal punishments.</p>
<p>I am suggesting that certain types of underlaw spring forth from actual problems of law&#8217;s legitimacy.  Exploring conspiracy theories in law, then, is akin to anthropology analyzing what cultural myths reflect about the world-view of the society.</p>
<p></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hauk</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/shake_down_ente.html/comment-page-1#comment-48068</link>
		<dc:creator>Hauk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/07/shake-down-entertainment-ltd.html#comment-48068</guid>
		<description>Apropos &quot;underlaw,&quot; Jon Siegel has a webpage devoted to detailing and debunking all of the bizarre legal theories that tax protestors use to justify not paying taxes.  It&#039;s available here:

http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/jsiegel/Personal/taxes/IncomeTax.htm

Some of it makes for pretty entertaining reading.

On the same topic, as a law clerk, I encountered a pro se prisoner litigant who claimed that his conviction should be vacated because the criminal statutes under which he was convicted had no implementing regulations.  Implementing regulations were not, of course, required, and the theory seemed pretty bizarre to me.  My research, however, revealed this wasn&#039;t the first time someone had advanced the theory.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apropos &#8220;underlaw,&#8221; Jon Siegel has a webpage devoted to detailing and debunking all of the bizarre legal theories that tax protestors use to justify not paying taxes.  It&#8217;s available here:</p>
<p><a href="http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/jsiegel/Personal/taxes/IncomeTax.htm" rel="nofollow">http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/jsiegel/Personal/taxes/IncomeTax.htm</a></p>
<p>Some of it makes for pretty entertaining reading.</p>
<p>On the same topic, as a law clerk, I encountered a pro se prisoner litigant who claimed that his conviction should be vacated because the criminal statutes under which he was convicted had no implementing regulations.  Implementing regulations were not, of course, required, and the theory seemed pretty bizarre to me.  My research, however, revealed this wasn&#8217;t the first time someone had advanced the theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
