Comments on: Question of the Day

By: ngo drone

ngo drone — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 04:33:19 +0000

26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3). Of *course*.

By: c smith

c smith — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:48:40 +0000

Can I have a tramp stamp pointing to what the 16th Amendment may kiss?

By: Isn't it obvious?

Isn't it obvious? — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:48:13 +0000

162

By: BDG

BDG — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:25:53 +0000

I’d say any real tax lawyer would have to pick section 61. It is the ur, the alpha and omega.

But, on the other hand, section 61 is long and I’m a wuss about needles. I’ll have to go with section 107 — because it’s short and rarely amended, and because I appreciate it as a fable about political economy.

By: Joey

Joey — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:34:10 +0000

KipEsquire:

Don’t let the door hit your humorless self and your blogroll on the way out.

By: Jeff Lipshaw

Jeff Lipshaw — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:12:17 +0000

No question about it. Section 4999. Because it's something to which one can aspire, particularly with a gross-up agreement.

By: db

db — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:52:04 +0000

Probably 5841. It's a great conversation starter.

By: db

db — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:36:36 +0000

Can we pick from historical codes? From, say, twenty years ago, before we returned to the imperial tradition of aristocratic inheritance?

By: James Grimmelmann

James Grimmelmann — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:27:38 +0000

One of the repealed sections — least pain from the tattooing process.

By: KipEsquire

KipEsquire — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:13:57 +0000

Pasquale’s posts I can deal with. This I can’t.

On behalf of me and my blogroll, goodbye.