Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

Search


Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

jr_114_9780195367195_bnr

jr_114_9780195383768_bnr

advertise-here4


FC-CO(SS)

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments

    • Observer on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • RJ on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • RJ on Ricci and Briscoe as Disparate Impact Cases

    • Mike Rich on Negligent Corpse Mishandling

    • anon on Privacy and Tattletales

    • orly lobel on At CELS, Hoping to Blog

    • harry brooks on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • RJ on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • Michael H Schneider on Negligent Corpse Mishandling

    • flood pictures on Public opinion on same-sex marriage

    • gtownstudent on And Justache For All at GW Law

    • AF on Ricci and Briscoe as Disparate Impact Cases

    • RJ on Ricci and Briscoe as Disparate Impact Cases

    • Maryland Conservatarian on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • Daniel S. Goldberg on Negligent Corpse Mishandling

  •  

    Site Meter

Public Service: It’s AALS Time (Yes, Already)

posted by Deven Desai

So it’s July. Summertime. I hear the livin’ is easy, fish are jumpin’, and the cotton is high. The different pace of summer allows me to reflect and write. Not exactly easy livin’ but I like it quite a bit. Still, this time of year slips away all too easily. August looms with syllabi to plan and lectures to prepare. For those interested in applying to become a professor the game, I am afraid to say, is on.

That odd rite the AALS Faculty Recruitment Conference (sorry the page is not built for some reason) is really around the corner. Now some may know that the conference itself is in October. But the key for you all is that the Faculty Appointments Register has deadlines next month. August 8 to be precise. These dates matter. Being in that first group is fairly important.

Today is July 7. That means about one month until the FAR information is due. TAKE A LOOK NOW. For trying to squash all you have done into a few small fields AND having a polished resume requires much more time than one might think.

One more tip: create a check list of each bit of information you want to have on the FAR form and no matter what make sure that whatever publications you have are on that FAR. The education, employment, and interests are more familiar so you may not miss those fields (although they should be on your list). The other fields, especially publications, do not always show up on a resume so pay attention for items that schools want but that you may not have encountered before. Again starting now will allow you to have that moment of “Oh God, I have not thought about that area.” From there you can often find you have experience or ask folks about what is appropriate rather than filling in the form with place holders that say little.

As always good luck to all.


 July 7, 2008 at 12:16 pm   Posted in: Law School (Hiring & Laterals)   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (9)

  1. Ubertrout - July 7, 2008 at 3:21 pm

    Is a certain distribution preferable? Should candidates try to get their resume into the first distribution if they can?

  2. Ben Barros - July 7, 2008 at 4:41 pm

    Yes, it is very important to get into the first distribution.

  3. Deven - July 7, 2008 at 5:56 pm

    Hmm, so I seem to have underplayed the significance of the first distribution when I said “Being in that first group is fairly important.”

    As noted by Ben, it is important. I do not think it is fatal to miss it, but for some schools it may be close to fatal. The wave of resumes in the first distribution and limited time may mean that committees will mainly look at only those in the first one. In addition, there may be a sense that those who know the game are in in that first wave. And that is part of why I wanted to alert people to the deadlines.

  4. anon - July 7, 2008 at 8:14 pm

    With respect to the first distribution, does it matter when one submits the FAR form. Is the sooner the better, or does it make no difference, provided one makes the deadline? Thanks.

  5. Deven - July 7, 2008 at 8:33 pm

    Good question. As far as I know (no pun intended), one must have the information in by the dealine on the site. Given that the distribution is available to committees at specific times controlled by AALS, I don’t think an early submission gains anything. That being said, AALS is an independent group that does as it pleases. I suggest going to their site and seeing what formalities they have in play this year. If the site is not so helpful, try contacting them. Not necessarily easy to do but again early planning can help account for lag times.

  6. Anon - July 8, 2008 at 3:23 pm

    I will be submitting my article to law reviews late July/early Aug. Unfortunately the FAR form states that only those publications an candidate indicates as accepted for publication are viewable to recruiters. Would it be OK if I check the “accepted for publication” box and then indicate in a parenthetical the date my article was submitted to law reviews? I would think it’s important to indicate to law schools that I have completed a manuscript.

  7. Deven - July 8, 2008 at 5:12 pm

    More hmm. As I do not have access to the latest FAR process I am not sure what to tell you. It seems odd that the form would not allow one to indicate that you have a submitted draft. In addition, I have no idea what to make of “only those publications an candidate indicates as accepted for publication are viewable to recruiters.” What is viewable? And how can they even enforce this idea?

    I would follow the rules of AALS and the FAR process. Contact AALS to get a solid answer about this oddity. If they really do not allow you to list that work under publications, there might be a comments section where you can alert folks to the works in progress you have and that you have submitted it.

    In general, your idea that being able to communicate you have publications and especially in that part of the form is on target. Whether FAR allows one to do that with a work in progress is harder to sort it seems.

    Sorry I don’t have more but honestly going to the source is your best bet for this sort of question.

  8. I Regret Nothing - July 8, 2008 at 11:51 pm

    I foolishly put on the form that I’d only take a job in DC, Boston, or NYC. Apparently that’s a real faux pas. Even if you only want a job in a big city, you’re supposed to string along schools in other places, and then parley their offers into an offer from one of the places you really want. No cheers for law prof hiring norms that discourage honesty and devotion to a place.

  9. anon - July 10, 2008 at 9:30 pm

    “Now some may know that the conference itself is in October.”

    Actually, it appears to be November 6-8, according to the brochure: http://www.aals.org/documents/frcbrochure.pdf

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove

Website
Understanding Privacy

Kaimipono Wenger

Website
SSRN Page

Dave Hoffman

Website
SSRN Page

Nate Oman

Website
SSRN Page

Frank Pasquale

Website
SSRN Page

Deven Desai

Website
SSRN Page

Danielle Citron

Website
SSRN Page

Lawrence Cunningham

Website
SSRN Page

Sarah Waldeck

Website
SSRN Page

Jaya Ramji-Nogales

Website
SSRN Page

Solangel Maldonado

Website
SSRN Page

Gerard Magliocca

Website
SSRN Page


Guests

Rachel Godsil
Alex Kreit
Anita Krishnakumar
Matthew Sag
Michael Zimmer






Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Ann Bartow
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
David Fagundes
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
John Ip
Kevin Johnson
Dan Kahan
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
David Post
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Susan Scafidi
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Sarah Waldeck
Melissa Waters
Alfred Yen
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Frank Wu
Corey Yung
Jonathan Zittrain

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress