<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legal Times Panel on ’07-’08 Term</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/legal_times_pan.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/legal_times_pan.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:53:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: şişme bebekler</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/legal_times_pan.html/comment-page-1#comment-67876</link>
		<dc:creator>şişme bebekler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/07/legal-times-panel-on-%e2%80%9907-%e2%80%9908-term.html#comment-67876</guid>
		<description>I agree with the “Two Courts” model. In the CNN-level cases, the Roberts Court turns into the Kennedy Court:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the “Two Courts” model. In the CNN-level cases, the Roberts Court turns into the Kennedy Court:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: şişme bebek</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/legal_times_pan.html/comment-page-1#comment-67875</link>
		<dc:creator>şişme bebek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/07/legal-times-panel-on-%e2%80%9907-%e2%80%9908-term.html#comment-67875</guid>
		<description>That sounds like a good panel; wish it was on the Web</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds like a good panel; wish it was on the Web</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sex shop</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/legal_times_pan.html/comment-page-1#comment-48438</link>
		<dc:creator>sex shop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/07/legal-times-panel-on-%e2%80%9907-%e2%80%9908-term.html#comment-48438</guid>
		<description>thanks

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike O'Shea</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/legal_times_pan.html/comment-page-1#comment-48437</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike O'Shea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/07/legal-times-panel-on-%e2%80%9907-%e2%80%9908-term.html#comment-48437</guid>
		<description>That sounds like a good panel; wish it was on the Web.

I agree with the &quot;Two Courts&quot; model.  In the CNN-level cases, the Roberts Court turns into the Kennedy Court:

http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/06/scotus_end_of_t.html

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds like a good panel; wish it was on the Web.</p>
<p>I agree with the &#8220;Two Courts&#8221; model.  In the CNN-level cases, the Roberts Court turns into the Kennedy Court:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/06/scotus_end_of_t.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/06/scotus_end_of_t.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Hendricks</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/legal_times_pan.html/comment-page-1#comment-48436</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Hendricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/07/legal-times-panel-on-%e2%80%9907-%e2%80%9908-term.html#comment-48436</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure you can generalize federal ignorance about what they are enacting to the states. My experience--admittedly in a low-population state (Montana)--has been that state legislators know what they are voting on and are pretty in touch with the views of their constituents. Also, don&#039;t many states have single-subject rules for legislation?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure you can generalize federal ignorance about what they are enacting to the states. My experience&#8211;admittedly in a low-population state (Montana)&#8211;has been that state legislators know what they are voting on and are pretty in touch with the views of their constituents. Also, don&#8217;t many states have single-subject rules for legislation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Wasserman</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/legal_times_pan.html/comment-page-1#comment-48435</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Wasserman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/07/legal-times-panel-on-%e2%80%9907-%e2%80%9908-term.html#comment-48435</guid>
		<description>The second Supreme Court not only is unknown to the public, it also is unknown to Congress. That is why confirmation hearings, which focus on constitutional  ideas in a narrow range of areas, have become so meaningless.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second Supreme Court not only is unknown to the public, it also is unknown to Congress. That is why confirmation hearings, which focus on constitutional  ideas in a narrow range of areas, have become so meaningless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thaddeus Hoffmeister</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/legal_times_pan.html/comment-page-1#comment-48434</link>
		<dc:creator>Thaddeus Hoffmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/07/legal-times-panel-on-%e2%80%9907-%e2%80%9908-term.html#comment-48434</guid>
		<description>The oversight by all the parties involved in the Kennedy v. Louisiana case points to a bigger issue. Since the ending of the draft, there is a major disconnect between the military and mainstream society.  The average citizen is unfamiliar with the military or the laws by which it operates.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The oversight by all the parties involved in the Kennedy v. Louisiana case points to a bigger issue. Since the ending of the draft, there is a major disconnect between the military and mainstream society.  The average citizen is unfamiliar with the military or the laws by which it operates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
