Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 5 (July 2008)
posted by Cornell Law Review
Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 5 (July 2008)
Symposium: U.S. Food and Drug Regulation in its First Century and Beyond
Articles
The Little Agency that Could (Act with Indifference to Constitutional and Statutory Strictures)
Lars Noah
Dirty Dancing—The FDA Stumbles with the Chevron Two-Step: A Response to Professor Noah
Gary Lawson
Losing Deference in the FDA’s Second Century: Judicial Review, Politics, and a Diminished Legacy of Expertise
James T. O’Reilly
The FDA and Deference Lost: A Self-Inflicted Would or the Product of a Wounded Agency? A Response to Professor O’Reilly
David C. Vladeck
FDA Regulatory Compliance Reconsidered
Carl Tobias
Great and Lesser Powers of Tort Reform: The Primary Jurisdiction Doctrine and State-Law Claims Concerning FDA-Approved Products
Catherine T. Struve
Drug Review “Behind the Curtain”: A Response to Professor Struve
James T. O’Reilly
Food, Drugs, and Droods: A Historical Consideration of Definitions and Categories in American Food and Drug Law
Lewis A. Grossman
July 13, 2008 at 3:54 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Cornell), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
Leave a Reply