Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Groundhog Day. (fp)

Banned in Tucson. (kw)

The Best and Worst of 2011 in Race and Law (kw)

Tortured to death for trespassing. (fp)

Drones of contention. (fp)

DOJ still coddling banks. (fp)

Creative destruction? Thank banks. (fp)

Blog about a new book, on how to talk to little girls--stressing smarts not cutes.   LAC

Macey on the heroic Rakoff. (fp)

Captured NY Fed. (fp)


solicitors

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Shag from Brookline on Omelets and Eggs

    • Joe on What Exactly is Wrong With Polygamy?

    • Phil on What Exactly is Wrong With Polygamy?

    • Lee on Lifecycles and the Firm

    • Car accident claim lawyers on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • Andrew MacKie-Mason on Can't the Supreme Court Just Say No to Cameras?

    • Joe on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Shag from Brookline on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Joe on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Joe on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Shag from Brookline on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • G. Calamita on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • Joe on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Howard Wasserman on Can't the Supreme Court Just Say No to Cameras?

    • Gerard Magliocca on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

Some Tips for Summer Associates: Navigating Work and Play

posted by Deven Desai

The Legal Times reports that summer associate hiring may take a hit this fall and that some fortunate enough to have a summer position this summer may not have an offer at the end of the work experience. Still the article describes some rather wild play events:

Cadwalader’s New York summer class had a private Q&A session with Laurence Fishburne two weeks ago, after attending his Broadway show “Thurgood,” a one-man play about the late Justice Thurgood Marshall. Weil, Gotshal & Manges is renting out an entire Nintendo store for its New York class to hold a Wii competition. In D.C., Crowell & Moring’s summer associates took a tour of the city while riding on Segways, and the firm will host its annual black-tie-optional summer associate casino night at a Washington hotel. Patton Boggs’ D.C. office will host a wine and cheese event where an artist will teach summer associates how to paint.

It is no wonder that some are starting to question law firms for billing practices and arguably wasteful approaches to the business. The Legal Times article notes that firms have been quite willing to layoff attorneys and cut summer hiring if they think that a recession is on the horizon (or it could be that when the incredible profit margins of 30 to 60 percent at the top will diminish a little, firms think the end of the world is nigh). So whatever the reason, summer associates at all levels and jobs (not just the big firm jobs) should be careful.

As a refresher, here are some posts about interviewing, ways to think about law school, and how to survive it.

And here are some tips for the summer:

Work hard and offer your best work at all times. This idea is obvious yet is easily forgotten. Yes in some places it seems that one is supposed to smile, shake hands, laugh about poker, talk about stocks, play golf (or Wii), and so on. Indeed, one should go to those events and engage with all the partners and associates involved. Remember they are taking time from their work and families to be social with you. So in a sense the interview persists all summer long. What trumps a night a ballgame? True work on a case. If you dive in and show that of course you love getting to know everyone but you have a case and work product is required, that will impress and should trump the social event.

NOW be sure to ask about the politics of such an odd quandary. For some partners will say go to the game, don’t worry about the memo. Some may say go to game, don’t worry about, BUT expect that like a real associate you will still have that work on her desk at 8 or 9 a.m. Others may think the game is a silly thing that infests the firm. Still others may realize that the work is billable, the game can and should be passed on, but still take it as an insult that you did not go to the game. And in some cases both partners will think whatever he or she is connected to is the most important thing.

Hopefully, there will be a neutral person (neither the attorney with the work nor the attorney leading the social event) to whom you can present the issue. Express the problem as I would love to go to the event but this memo, motion, etc. is pressing. I want to do well for the person for whom I am working and the firm, but I want to be polite to the person making time to get to know me. Someone should be able to navigate the details or give you good advice on the way to handle the personalities involved.

Again, don’t be fooled by what appears to be a roll in at 10 a.m., surf the Web, have lunch at a place no one eats at on their own dime, and then kill time before the gym or dinner environment. Whatever work you have do it with an aim towards excellence.

So what if one is not at a big firm? Well the wine/dine aspect is less likely or frequent. Nonetheless insofar as social moments arise (e.g., someone asks if you want to grab a burger and each pays his or her way or the ubiquitous coffee chat) take them and apply the basic rules of interviewing and being polite. People want to know you do good work, but they also want to know that it is good to work with you.

Regardless of where one works, one issue can arise in almost any context: how do you get the good assignments? More on that in the next day or so.


 June 5, 2008 at 9:55 am   Posted in: Law Practice   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (3)

  1. anon - June 5, 2008 at 3:04 pm

    The summer firm “wine and dine” is a major part of what is wrong with law firms today: bait and switch, unreasonable billable hour demands to support extravagant lifestyles, and a perception of prestige/competition between firms. Anyone think overbilling….er…..”high expectations of billable hour performance for junior associates” is not a direct result of extavagance in office, dining, summer play choices for firms? Didnt think so….

    I for one wont be participating. And just because I had to pay for my own ticket to the game doesnt mean I wont enjoy it….

  2. Aaron W. - June 6, 2008 at 10:47 am

    When I was at a big firm, i remember saying to the partners themsleves that the summer program seemed almost like “fraud in the inducement” and to their credit, they laughed pretty hard at that.

    I say anon is crazy to refuse the gifts.

    But I will also say this to summer associates. Do not make the mistake of thinking this is a job. This is a 3 month job interview. As is the case in most areas of life, keep your eye on the bottom line. The bottom line is they will want you to show them that you will be a valuable addition to this firm. Show that you are willing to stay late and come in early. show that you are willing to do grunt work, such as document review. I’m not sayign you should work yourself to death during the summer, but do those things often enough to let them think you are willing to do the heavy lifting involved in firm life. And there is nothing wrong with saying to them, “hey, look, i am smart enough to know that this is not a sample of real firm life and things will get harder if i come to work for your permanently. i hope you can see by my actions that i am willing to roll up my sleeves and get to work.”

    Like here is a very simple example. if there is a deadline looming, don’t go out for fun while the partner is back in the office. maybe s/he won’t resent those who do that, but you make a better impression if you stay and help him go home earlier.

    For recruiters, i would tell you that personally a $100 lunch was less impressive to me than a lunch at McDonald’s followed by, say, a night at the local comedy club. For instance, we managed to see Larry the Cable guy before he became famous. And my wife loved that we were able to go sailing–she likes boats in general and sail boats in particular. Doing things, in my book, is better than just eating expensive food. ineed, in my case, the fancier the food, the less likely i am to actually like it.

  3. MJG - June 6, 2008 at 6:57 pm

    Manage your work-flow if you have an open assignment system; you’re significantly better off taking a manageable number of assignments and perfecting them than trying to show what a good worker you are by taking assignments from all over. Doing that also can lead to the worst of all scenarios, where you have work due for two partners at the same time and you wind up insulting one to finish up the work for the other.

    And remember: there is no such thing as a rough draft. No document with your name on it (be it a memo, underwriting agreement, mark-up, or brief or motion) must ever leave your hands before it is ready. Even if you plan on doing more drafts, don’t send it out unless it is perfect.

    If you need a partner or senior associate’s feedback on a document before you are done with it, you are best off speaking with them than you are with showing it to them.

    Finally, I agree with Aaron W: the “stuff” is the best part of the summer. Lunches are great as are dinners, but you want to go to events that you wouldn’t otherwise be able to do and plan your schedule and workload around that rather than simply jumping on every free meal and drink the firm offers.

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Derek Bambauer
Gabriella Coleman
andré douglas pond cummings
David Gray
Brishen Rogers
Joseph Turow
Elizabeth A. Wilson













Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress