<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Statistics on Law Professor Hiring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/more_statistics.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/more_statistics.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:19:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Solove</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/more_statistics.html/comment-page-1#comment-49057</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Solove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 03:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/05/more-statistics-on-law-professor-hiring.html#comment-49057</guid>
		<description>Tom -- my mistake.  I&#039;ve now deleted BC from the table in this post.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom &#8212; my mistake.  I&#8217;ve now deleted BC from the table in this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/more_statistics.html/comment-page-1#comment-49056</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 03:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/05/more-statistics-on-law-professor-hiring.html#comment-49056</guid>
		<description>Hmm...actually, you repeated a school that you had in your previous post...namely, Boston College, which is still within the top 30 US News Report (26? or something like that).

Why was that?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;actually, you repeated a school that you had in your previous post&#8230;namely, Boston College, which is still within the top 30 US News Report (26? or something like that).</p>
<p>Why was that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/more_statistics.html/comment-page-1#comment-49055</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/05/more-statistics-on-law-professor-hiring.html#comment-49055</guid>
		<description>A brief point--could you be double-counting candidates?  That is, if someone was on the market in 06-07, and then again in 07-08, would you have counted them twice, making it look like there were more candidates from a school than there actually were?  This could skew your results slightly. (This may be what Alfred was alluding to.)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A brief point&#8211;could you be double-counting candidates?  That is, if someone was on the market in 06-07, and then again in 07-08, would you have counted them twice, making it look like there were more candidates from a school than there actually were?  This could skew your results slightly. (This may be what Alfred was alluding to.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/more_statistics.html/comment-page-1#comment-49054</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 06:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/05/more-statistics-on-law-professor-hiring.html#comment-49054</guid>
		<description>&quot;Some of the schools below have placed more successful applicants than a number of schools in the top 20.&quot;

Given that GW and Wash-St. Louis placed exactly zero, that is not hard.  I think the more intuitive take from these numbers is that, unless you went to a top twenty school (really a top top 20 school), your chance of breaking into the legal academy is no more than 10% at most.  The fact that that abysmal chance is true of several top twenty schools also, is cold comfort.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Some of the schools below have placed more successful applicants than a number of schools in the top 20.&#8221;</p>
<p>Given that GW and Wash-St. Louis placed exactly zero, that is not hard.  I think the more intuitive take from these numbers is that, unless you went to a top twenty school (really a top top 20 school), your chance of breaking into the legal academy is no more than 10% at most.  The fact that that abysmal chance is true of several top twenty schools also, is cold comfort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfred</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/more_statistics.html/comment-page-1#comment-49053</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 05:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/05/more-statistics-on-law-professor-hiring.html#comment-49053</guid>
		<description>Dan--thanks for this.  You&#039;re doing a great service, as always.

These data are sobering.  And I hope we&#039;ll talk some about what this means to our profession.

One question, though, did you think about using the AALS directory instead of Solum&#039;s report?  My thought is that you might go through all the people in the 2006-07 registry and see who appears in the 2007-08 AALS directory.

That obviously won&#039;t pick up people who&#039;re hired in 2007-08, but for the earlier years, I&#039;d imagine it&#039;s a complete record of who&#039;s been hired.  Also, it would pick up some people who obtained visiting positions and I&#039;d think that would be desirable to include them in your tables, to give a fuller sense of who&#039;s able to &quot;break into&quot; the academy.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan&#8211;thanks for this.  You&#8217;re doing a great service, as always.</p>
<p>These data are sobering.  And I hope we&#8217;ll talk some about what this means to our profession.</p>
<p>One question, though, did you think about using the AALS directory instead of Solum&#8217;s report?  My thought is that you might go through all the people in the 2006-07 registry and see who appears in the 2007-08 AALS directory.</p>
<p>That obviously won&#8217;t pick up people who&#8217;re hired in 2007-08, but for the earlier years, I&#8217;d imagine it&#8217;s a complete record of who&#8217;s been hired.  Also, it would pick up some people who obtained visiting positions and I&#8217;d think that would be desirable to include them in your tables, to give a fuller sense of who&#8217;s able to &#8220;break into&#8221; the academy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
