<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Administrative Patent Judges Unconstitutional?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/are_administrat.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/are_administrat.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:22:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/are_administrat.html/comment-page-1#comment-49397</link>
		<dc:creator>lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/05/are-administrative-patent-judges-unconstitutional.html#comment-49397</guid>
		<description>Some people are misunderstanding some of the issues.  First, it&#039;s not &quot;the entire field&quot; that&#039;s at issue.  Those judges aren&#039;t the ones who do Article III patent litigation cases. Second, the key section of the Freytag opinion upon which the argument is based can be read not only as dicta but also as dicta that the current court is unlikey to adopt.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people are misunderstanding some of the issues.  First, it&#8217;s not &#8220;the entire field&#8221; that&#8217;s at issue.  Those judges aren&#8217;t the ones who do Article III patent litigation cases. Second, the key section of the Freytag opinion upon which the argument is based can be read not only as dicta but also as dicta that the current court is unlikey to adopt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samir Chopra</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/are_administrat.html/comment-page-1#comment-49396</link>
		<dc:creator>Samir Chopra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/05/are-administrative-patent-judges-unconstitutional.html#comment-49396</guid>
		<description>Daniel, would you or anyone else at Concurring Opinions care to offer some speculation on what the impact of Professor Duffy&#039;s paper might be? What are we looking at: Wholesale invalidation of patent court rulings? The overturning of appointments? Or will there be some less-disruptive outcome to this situation?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, would you or anyone else at Concurring Opinions care to offer some speculation on what the impact of Professor Duffy&#8217;s paper might be? What are we looking at: Wholesale invalidation of patent court rulings? The overturning of appointments? Or will there be some less-disruptive outcome to this situation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
