<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Yale Law Journal Pocket Part: How “Swingers” Might Save Hollywood from a Federal Pornography Statute</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/the_yale_law_jo_13.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/the_yale_law_jo_13.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:19:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ann Bartow</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/the_yale_law_jo_13.html/comment-page-1#comment-49427</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Bartow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 07:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/04/the-yale-law-journal-pocket-part-how-%e2%80%9cswingers%e2%80%9d-might-save-hollywood-from-a-federal-pornography-statute.html#comment-49427</guid>
		<description>This article is very inaccurate and badly written, as I discuss here: http://feministlawprofs.law.sc.edu/?p=3436

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is very inaccurate and badly written, as I discuss here: <a href="http://feministlawprofs.law.sc.edu/?p=3436" rel="nofollow">http://feministlawprofs.law.sc.edu/?p=3436</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
