<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What the Opinions May Look Like in D.C. v. Heller</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/snap_prediction.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/snap_prediction.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:17:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/snap_prediction.html/comment-page-1#comment-49878</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/03/what-the-opinions-may-look-like-in-dc-v-heller.html#comment-49878</guid>
		<description>Be sensible!  A well regulated militia (Amend II) means just that: INDIVIDUAL CITIZENS BEARING ARMS IS WHAT FORMS A MILITIA!!!  It is a constitutional right of free men to keep and bear arms.  Amendment II: acurate, presise, and beautifully simplistic!!  Of course, ruling masses called governments don&#039;t like being subordinate.  So what?  People are in control of governments in America.  BY PROCLAMATION!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be sensible!  A well regulated militia (Amend II) means just that: INDIVIDUAL CITIZENS BEARING ARMS IS WHAT FORMS A MILITIA!!!  It is a constitutional right of free men to keep and bear arms.  Amendment II: acurate, presise, and beautifully simplistic!!  Of course, ruling masses called governments don&#8217;t like being subordinate.  So what?  People are in control of governments in America.  BY PROCLAMATION!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fûz</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/snap_prediction.html/comment-page-1#comment-49877</link>
		<dc:creator>Fûz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/03/what-the-opinions-may-look-like-in-dc-v-heller.html#comment-49877</guid>
		<description>I agree with commenters Jack, Jack, and Jack, that &quot;any of the liberals might find an individual right outside of the context of active participation in the militia.&quot;

A commenter elsewhere, Countertop Chronicles I think, noted that Justice Ginsburg will see an analogue between an individual Second Amendment right and a right to abortion.  Loss of one will make the other hard to defend.  She has made comments amenable to an individual RKBA prior to appointment to the Sup Ct.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with commenters Jack, Jack, and Jack, that &#8220;any of the liberals might find an individual right outside of the context of active participation in the militia.&#8221;</p>
<p>A commenter elsewhere, Countertop Chronicles I think, noted that Justice Ginsburg will see an analogue between an individual Second Amendment right and a right to abortion.  Loss of one will make the other hard to defend.  She has made comments amenable to an individual RKBA prior to appointment to the Sup Ct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Muggle</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/snap_prediction.html/comment-page-1#comment-49876</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Muggle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/03/what-the-opinions-may-look-like-in-dc-v-heller.html#comment-49876</guid>
		<description>This seems right, but I wonder if any of the liberals might find an individual right outside of the context of active participation in the militia, strike down D.C.&#039;s law, and differ on  what reasonableness means in future cases. It seems this could be the content of a Breyer-Ginsburg concurrence.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems right, but I wonder if any of the liberals might find an individual right outside of the context of active participation in the militia, strike down D.C.&#8217;s law, and differ on  what reasonableness means in future cases. It seems this could be the content of a Breyer-Ginsburg concurrence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Muggle</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/snap_prediction.html/comment-page-1#comment-49875</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Muggle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/03/what-the-opinions-may-look-like-in-dc-v-heller.html#comment-49875</guid>
		<description>This seems right, but I wonder if any of the liberals might find an individual right outside of the context of active participation in the militia, strike down D.C.&#039;s law, and differ on  what reasonableness means in future cases. It seems this could be the content of a Breyer-Ginsburg concurrence.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems right, but I wonder if any of the liberals might find an individual right outside of the context of active participation in the militia, strike down D.C.&#8217;s law, and differ on  what reasonableness means in future cases. It seems this could be the content of a Breyer-Ginsburg concurrence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Muggle</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/snap_prediction.html/comment-page-1#comment-49874</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Muggle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/03/what-the-opinions-may-look-like-in-dc-v-heller.html#comment-49874</guid>
		<description>This seems right, but I wonder if any of the liberals might find an individual right outside of the context of active participation in the militia, strike down D.C.&#039;s law, and differ on  what reasonableness means in future cases. It seems this could be the content of a Breyer-Ginsburg concurrence.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems right, but I wonder if any of the liberals might find an individual right outside of the context of active participation in the militia, strike down D.C.&#8217;s law, and differ on  what reasonableness means in future cases. It seems this could be the content of a Breyer-Ginsburg concurrence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Muggle</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/snap_prediction.html/comment-page-1#comment-49873</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Muggle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/03/what-the-opinions-may-look-like-in-dc-v-heller.html#comment-49873</guid>
		<description>This seems right, but I wonder if any of the liberals might find an individual right outside of the context of active participation in the militia, strike down D.C.&#039;s law, and differ on  what reasonableness means in future cases. It seems this could be the content of a Breyer-Ginsburg concurrence.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems right, but I wonder if any of the liberals might find an individual right outside of the context of active participation in the militia, strike down D.C.&#8217;s law, and differ on  what reasonableness means in future cases. It seems this could be the content of a Breyer-Ginsburg concurrence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
