the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

Search

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

lr_jkr9_15_08privacy.jpg

ad-logo5.jpg

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

Law-Rev-Forum-2.jpg

law-rev-contents2.jpg

Law-Prof-Blog-Census.jpg

Categories

Accounting
Administrative Announcements
Administrative Law
Admiralty
Advertising
Agricultural Law
Anonymity
Antitrust
Architecture
Articles and Books
Bankruptcy
Behavioral Law and Economics
Bioethics
Blogging
Book Reviews
Bright Ideas
Capital Punishment
Civil Procedure
Civil Rights
Conferences
Constitutional Law
Consumer Protection Law
Contract Law & Beyond
Corporate Finance
Corporate Law
Criminal Law
Criminal Procedure
Culture
Current Events
Cyberlaw
DRM
Economic Analysis of Law
Education
Empirical Analysis of Law
Employment Law
Environmental Law
Estates and Trusts
Evidence Law
Family Law
Feminism and Gender
First Amendment
Food
Google & Search Engines
Health Law
History of Law
Humor
Immigration
Insurance Law
Intellectual Property
International & Comparative Law
Interviews
Jurisprudence
Law and Humanities
Law and Inequality
Law and Psychology
Law Practice
Law Professor Blogger Census
Law Rev (Boston College)
Law Rev (Boston University)
Law Rev (California)
Law Rev (Chicago)
Law Rev (Columbia)
Law Rev (Cornell)
Law Rev (Duke)
Law Rev (Emory)
Law Rev (Fordham)
Law Rev (Georgetown)
Law Rev (GW)
Law Rev (Harvard)
Law Rev (Illinois)
Law Rev (Indiana)
Law Rev (Iowa)
Law Rev (Michigan)
Law Rev (Minnesota)
Law Rev (Northwestern)
Law Rev (Notre Dame)
Law Rev (NYU)
Law Rev (Penn)
Law Rev (S Cal)
Law Rev (Stanford)
Law Rev (Texas)
Law Rev (UCLA)
Law Rev (Vanderbilt)
Law Rev (Virginia)
Law Rev (Wash U)
Law Rev (Wm & Mary)
Law Rev (Yale)
Law Rev Contents
Law Rev Forum
Law School
Law School (Hiring & Laterals)
Law School (Law Reviews)
Law School (Rankings)
Law School (Scholarship)
Law School (Teaching)
Law Student Discussions
Law Talk
Legal Ethics
Legal Theory
Media Law
Movies & Television
Philosophy of Social Science
Politics
Privacy
Privacy (Consumer Privacy)
Privacy (Electronic Surveillance)
Privacy (Gossip & Shaming)
Privacy (ID Theft)
Privacy (Law Enforcement)
Privacy (Medical)
Privacy (National Security)
Property Law
Race
Religion
Reparations
Science Fiction
Second Amendment
Securities
Securities Regulation
Social Network Websites
Sociology of Law
Supreme Court
Tax
Teaching
Technology
Tort Law
Web 2.0
Weird
Wiki
Wills, Trusts, and Estates

Archives

December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

 

« Horse Racing the Democratic Endgame -- Spoiler Alert? | Main | "Don't Resist Until It's Too Late" »

March 09, 2008

Dumbo Journalism

posted by Frank Pasquale

dumbo.JPGWhat happens when political journalists entirely give up on covering policy? CNN today featured a segment on "Queen Kong" vs. "Barack-zilla," perhaps inspired by Samantha Power's faux pas (or Nicholas Mosley's great novel?). "Experts agree" that Obama is a Mac and Clinton a PC. Maureen Dowd notes that one of the Democratic frontrunners has been compared to "Ma Barker . . . [tapping] into the angst of blue-collar women who know they have to ignore their 'moping men and . . . hold the house together.'”

But the nadir may be this piece by Jeff Greenfield offering a new metaphor for the2008 presidential election: Barack as Bugs Bunny, and Hillary as Daffy Duck. Voters in general prefer the "Bugs" candidate, but this recondite analysis can give rise to some complications:

The Bugs-Daffy dichotomy gets intriguing when you try to apply it to the general election. If Clinton pulls out the nomination, it will be Daffy vs. Daffy. There is no doubt that John McCain takes on politics with a Daffy-like suspicion of the corrupt, feckless folks about him. If Obama prevails in the primaries, we will have a dramatic Bugs-Daffy face-off. And it may be that McCain will be the candidate to break the losing Daffy pattern, because he'll be able to argue successfully that in a dangerous world, you need a president more in touch with the dark side of human nature. . .

Eugene Volokh questions the validity (or scalability?) of the Bugs/Daffy theory; I'm just wondering, is this the best political journalists can offer? Caricatures of caricatures?

I wouldn't be so tough on Slate if it weren't for a Jack Shafer column effectively celebrating the worst trends in political coverage. Horserace coverage merely focuses on who's up, and who's down, and the (often superficial) ways in which candidates win or lose a news cycle. Shafer doesn't worry if reporters don't cover issues; he complacently sees the campaign as merely a matter of positional competition:

Critics of horseracism complain that it isolates on poll results and reports from campaign rallies to the exclusion of discussions of political "substance." . . . .But even if the press corps had abandoned substance, no voter is more than a mouse click away from detailed policy papers and unfiltered campaign speeches by the candidates.
***
Of course, reporters should never forget that their subjective impressions of the voters' subjective impressions are … subjective, and that reporters are as fallible as anybody. But these subjective impressions also convey essential information that helps voters decide which candidate will govern best.

Such as? The "essential information" that if the press doesn't like a candidate, the candidate is unlikely to succeed? That's a self-fulfilling prophecy, not objective reporting.

Ironically, establishment journalists rejected a real alternative to horse-race mania--the civic journalism movement--back in the 1990s because they claimed that extensive coverage of issues would amount to media bias. Since the media have to decide which issues to cover, that selection itself could unduly influence elections. But in the name of an illusory objectivity, journalists like Shafer and Greenfield now wield far more power than they ever could as responsible reporters of candidates' policy positions. Their unjustified (and often unjustifiable) perceptions--of who's "presidential," who has "experience," who exudes "gravitas," who's too young or too old to be president, who "you'd like to have a beer with"--end up crowding out useful observations of what a given president or party would actually do for the country.

I really enjoy Slate, and I listen to most of its podcasts. So it pains me to comment on the decline of political reporting there. The vast compendium of policy reporting (such as a great series on the health care plans of the candidates) that truly distinguishes the site rarely seem to get integrated into its Politico-style meta-commentary on perceptions of perceptions in the presidential race.

To his credit, one Slate journalist (Timothy Noah) has questioned the legitimacy of a punditocracy all too easily sliding between roles as reporters, commentators, and de facto kingmakers in the primary process. Unless the talking heads start focusing more on policy and less on strategy, they should expect increasingly strident critiques like Glenn Greenwald's--who's gibed that "real work, active investigation [and] critical thought [are] the mortal enemies of most establishment reporters."

Posted by Frank Pasquale at March 9, 2008 10:52 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.concurringopinions.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/3341.

Comments

Frank,

Where media criticism is concerned, I'd say that Shafer is Bugs to Greenwald's Daffy. :-)

Greenwald stokes the anti-MSM embers of the blogosphere. It's just tiresome after a while. He's certainly brilliant; his defense of Ezra Levant, a Canadian journalist hauled before a hate speech tribunal, was sublime.

But I haven't seen Greenwald with a sense of humor. Maybe I've missed those pieces. Slate, in the overall picture, is pretty entertaining and informative.

Question to armchair media critics out there: would you say that the blogosphere stems "horseracism" -- or encourages it?

For anyone looking, a google search tells me that Nomi Prins recently compared Obama v. Clinton on economic issues in Mother Jones. 8 people have blogged about it.

Posted by: Jon Garfunkel at March 10, 2008 01:02 AM


I do not find Glenn Greenwald tiresome. If you get bored by tales of government malfeasance, duplicity, and media narcolepsy, so be it, but I have a deep interest in understanding more about why the mainstream media appear to be failing so abysmally to inform and illuminate events.
I read Greenwald all the time and I do not find him to be humorless. Like many progressives who have a deep dislike of recent developments in the USA, he currently focusses on using irony, snark and sarcasm extensively as devices for pointing out the sheer vapidity and superficiality of the media's coverage of most modern political and societal issues.
I happen to believe that one of the reasons why the mainstream media is pissing me off is that most of its practitioners decided (consciously or sub-consciously) that they would rather entertain than inform.
As far as horseracism is concerned...I would say that the sites I frequent in the blogosphere tend to shy away from horseracism, but there are plenty of sites, bloggers and commenters out there that are as wedded to the horse-race concept as the mainstream media. I would rate the blogosphere overall as only slightly better than the mainstream.
Jay Rosen has interesting postings and discussions on this issue at pressthink.org, during which he points out that the horse-race metaphor has been with us for decades.

Posted by: Graham Shevlin at March 12, 2008 02:15 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Authors

Daniel J. Solove

Website
Understanding Privacy

Kaimipono Wenger

Website
SSRN Page

Dave Hoffman

Website
SSRN Page

Nate Oman

Website
SSRN Page

Frank Pasquale

Website
SSRN Page

Deven Desai

Website
SSRN Page

Michael O'Shea

Website
SSRN Page

Sarah Waldeck

Website
SSRN Page

Lawrence Cunningham

Website
SSRN Page

Danielle Citron

Website
SSRN Page

Jaya Ramji-Nogales

Website
SSRN Page


Guests

Paul Butler
Miriam Cherry
Mark Edwards
Brian Kalt
Jonathan Lipson
Scott Moss
Susan Scafidi






ad-logo3.jpg

blawg100_winner2.jpg

Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Craig Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Dan Kahan
Sam Kamin
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Joseph Liu
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil RIchards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Paul Secunda
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Robert Tsai
Steve Vladeck
Sarah Waldeck
Melissa Waters
Alfred Yen
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Howard Wasserman
Jonathan Zittrain

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
Beltway Blogroll
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
Convictions
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
JD2B.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Letters
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian
Mirror of Justice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
Political Theory Daily Review
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog

Pajamas Media BlogRoll Member