<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Immigration Law to Prosecute Terrorism Charges: Double Jeopardy or Fair Play?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/02/using_immigrati.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/02/using_immigrati.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Lister</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/02/using_immigrati.html/comment-page-1#comment-50388</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Lister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 19:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/02/using-immigration-law-to-prosecute-terrorism-charges-double-jeopardy-or-fair-play.html#comment-50388</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that one of the real problems in this area is the use of secret evidence.  Obviously this sometimes a problem in contexts other than immigration court when we are dealing with terrorism charges, but my impression is that secret evidence is _used_ more in immigration court, or at least has been.  In the past, in some of the most famous cases, it seems that what was so secret about the evidence was that there was none.  Obviously insofar as secret evidence (or &quot;evidence&quot;) is used to deport people there is a pretty serious worry about injustice being done.  Since Jaya is something of an expert on this topic (and I&#039;m not!) I hope she&#039;ll post something on it soon.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that one of the real problems in this area is the use of secret evidence.  Obviously this sometimes a problem in contexts other than immigration court when we are dealing with terrorism charges, but my impression is that secret evidence is _used_ more in immigration court, or at least has been.  In the past, in some of the most famous cases, it seems that what was so secret about the evidence was that there was none.  Obviously insofar as secret evidence (or &#8220;evidence&#8221;) is used to deport people there is a pretty serious worry about injustice being done.  Since Jaya is something of an expert on this topic (and I&#8217;m not!) I hope she&#8217;ll post something on it soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wm. tyroler</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/02/using_immigrati.html/comment-page-1#comment-50387</link>
		<dc:creator>wm. tyroler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 01:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/02/using-immigration-law-to-prosecute-terrorism-charges-double-jeopardy-or-fair-play.html#comment-50387</guid>
		<description>How is the situation described in the post any different from an acquittal not barring a subsequent revocation of (parole, probation, or comparable supervision) at an administrative hearing? It&#039;s settled that there&#039;s no DJ bar in that latter setting, and I can&#039;t see, at first glance anyway, why there isn&#039;t a decent analogy to be made to deportation proceedings.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is the situation described in the post any different from an acquittal not barring a subsequent revocation of (parole, probation, or comparable supervision) at an administrative hearing? It&#8217;s settled that there&#8217;s no DJ bar in that latter setting, and I can&#8217;t see, at first glance anyway, why there isn&#8217;t a decent analogy to be made to deportation proceedings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

