Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Groundhog Day. (fp)

Banned in Tucson. (kw)

The Best and Worst of 2011 in Race and Law (kw)

Tortured to death for trespassing. (fp)

Drones of contention. (fp)

DOJ still coddling banks. (fp)

Creative destruction? Thank banks. (fp)

Blog about a new book, on how to talk to little girls--stressing smarts not cutes.   LAC

Macey on the heroic Rakoff. (fp)

Captured NY Fed. (fp)


solicitors

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Shag from Brookline on Omelets and Eggs

    • Shag from Brookline on Omelets and Eggs

    • Joe on What Exactly is Wrong With Polygamy?

    • Phil on What Exactly is Wrong With Polygamy?

    • Lee on Lifecycles and the Firm

    • Car accident claim lawyers on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • Andrew MacKie-Mason on Can't the Supreme Court Just Say No to Cameras?

    • Joe on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Shag from Brookline on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Joe on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Joe on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Shag from Brookline on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • G. Calamita on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • Joe on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Howard Wasserman on Can't the Supreme Court Just Say No to Cameras?
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

The Secret Life of (Law Professor Proceedings) Editors

posted by Paul Secunda

secretlife.jpgWoe unto you who is asked by a senior, big-whig colleague, who has the ability to make or break your career, to “assist” them and edit the proceedings of a conference or symposium. Are you doomed to reading practitioner pieces that have never seen the light of the blue book? Must you stare for years upon years on undisturbed piles of copy that have not yet seen the editor’s pen?

No, Bodie and Hirsch, you need not my whiny friends. The answer to such a quandry is organization and yes, many, many doe-eyed research assistants. Here’s my story of how I won the Battle of Who Could Care Less.

Imagine my surprise when I was asked to become a research fellow at a prestigious institution’s labor and employment law institute. Wow, little ‘ol Mississippian me had finally arrived in the hallowed halls of academia. The only catch was that I needed to present a paper at a forthcoming conference at said school. Why, I’d love to.

And one more thing: when the conference is over, you are in charge of editing the twenty-some papers of the participants and producing a 700-page or so book for the institute. Deal? Sure, and can I also be your Yoko Ono after this and follow you around wherever you go?


So how do you make the best of this potentially tedious process? First, you need to get your esteemed authors to sign a copyright release. Sounds easy, no? Almost nine months later, I am still trying to collect the last one. The big issue is whether they will be able to publish their piece elsewhere. Suggestion: tell them to take the copyright form and change it so it fits their purposes. Then hold your breath and hope the publisher doesn’t notice or doesn’t care.

Second, you’ll need to put in some effort (and many annoying reminder emails) to get them to turn their finished pieces in on a timely basis (meaning within two to three months of the deadline). For the academic authors from whom you have solicited already published law review pieces this is not much of a problem. Yes, there is a bizarre format that has to be followed for this book, with contradictory formatting in notes 2 and 3 of the Style Manual, but such is life.

On the other hand, trying to get a paper in any decent sort of shape from a real-live, practicing attorney, well you can just forget about it. They’re solving the problems of the world and don’t have time for us academic, ivory-tower types. Yes, these practitioners are very intelligent people who you would think that you could ask simple things of such as: Can you please follow this Style Manual and write the piece in prose form? Prose form, says Author A, does that mean you want my very best CLE outline? No, I say, please give this to one of your three hundred, needy summer associates at your firm who are already earning more money that I ever will and make them earn at least some of that ridiculous sum of money. Summer Associate A says: Would an outline be OK? No, I say. And I get an outline of this superstar attorney’s latest CLE magnus opus anyhow and ding-dong Summer Associate A gets an offer after considering such imponderable questions on Lat’s Above the Law as Should Lawyers Date Other Lawyers?

Once you get all the copyright forms signed and what we will call the “finished” pieces, this is where you must embrace the art of delegation and develop a good working relationship with a large number of eager (read “not jaded yet”) research assistants. After approaching said students, and getting by the awkward, “You are again?,” explain to them the marvels of [fill-in-blank] law that they will learn as a grasshopper sitting at your feet. And then treat them like Mr. Miyagi (though don’t make them wash your car). And keep reminding them that out of this process they will earn the coveted ability to call you “Master” and list you as a “mentor” on their resume.

And that is what I did (minus the crying, pleading, screaming, and threats). And miraculously, this killer group of three law students got these 21 articles into shape over the months, and now a 675-page volume on the ins and outs of workplace retaliation and whistle blowing law is ready to go to the publisher. And to think, they might have even learned something educational out of all this.

Follow these tips, Proceeding Editors of the future, and you may also avoid General Boredom and Major Apathy in the battle of who could care less.


 February 18, 2008 at 11:43 am   Posted in: Law School (Scholarship)   Print This Post Print This Post

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Derek Bambauer
Gabriella Coleman
andré douglas pond cummings
David Gray
Brishen Rogers
Joseph Turow
Elizabeth A. Wilson













Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress