the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

Search

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Yale University Press

ad-logo5.jpg

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

Law-Rev-Forum-2.jpg

law-rev-contents2.jpg

Law-Prof-Blog-Census.jpg

Categories

Administrative Announcements
Administrative Law
Admiralty
Advertising
Agricultural Law
Anonymity
Antitrust
Architecture
Articles and Books
Bankruptcy
Behavioral Law and Economics
Bioethics
Blogging
Book Reviews
Capital Punishment
Civil Procedure
Civil Rights
Conferences
Constitutional Law
Consumer Protection Law
Contract Law & Beyond
Corporate Law
Criminal Law
Criminal Procedure
Culture
Current Events
Cyberlaw
DRM
Economic Analysis of Law
Education
Empirical Analysis of Law
Employment Law
Environmental Law
Family Law
Feminism and Gender
First Amendment
Food
Google & Search Engines
Health Law
History of Law
Humor
Immigration
Insurance Law
Intellectual Property
International & Comparative Law
Interviews
Jurisprudence
Law and Humanities
Law and Inequality
Law and Psychology
Law Practice
Law Professor Blogger Census
Law Rev (Boston College)
Law Rev (Boston University)
Law Rev (California)
Law Rev (Chicago)
Law Rev (Columbia)
Law Rev (Cornell)
Law Rev (Duke)
Law Rev (Emory)
Law Rev (Fordham)
Law Rev (Georgetown)
Law Rev (GW)
Law Rev (Harvard)
Law Rev (Illinois)
Law Rev (Indiana)
Law Rev (Michigan)
Law Rev (Minnesota)
Law Rev (Northwestern)
Law Rev (Notre Dame)
Law Rev (NYU)
Law Rev (Penn)
Law Rev (S Cal)
Law Rev (Stanford)
Law Rev (Texas)
Law Rev (UCLA)
Law Rev (Vanderbilt)
Law Rev (Virginia)
Law Rev (Wash U)
Law Rev (Yale)
Law Rev Contents
Law Rev Forum
Law School
Law School (Hiring & Laterals)
Law School (Law Reviews)
Law School (Rankings)
Law School (Scholarship)
Law School (Teaching)
Law Student Discussions
Law Talk
Legal Ethics
Legal Theory
Media Law
Movies & Television
Philosophy of Social Science
Politics
Privacy
Privacy (Consumer Privacy)
Privacy (Electronic Surveillance)
Privacy (Gossip & Shaming)
Privacy (ID Theft)
Privacy (Law Enforcement)
Privacy (Medical)
Privacy (National Security)
Property Law
Race
Religion
Reparations
Science Fiction
Securities
Social Network Websites
Sociology of Law
Supreme Court
Tax
Teaching
Technology
Tort Law
Web 2.0
Weird
Wiki
Wills, Trusts, and Estates

Recent Comments

Hanah Volokh on Law Review Article Submission Resources (Spring 2008)

Michael Risch on Law Review Article Submission Resources (Spring 2008)

Archives

May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005

 

« Larry Solum's Entry Level Hiring Report 2007-08 | Main | The Wikileaks Injunction Case »

February 21, 2008

Law Review Article Submission Resources (Spring 2008)

posted by Daniel J. Solove
book21a.jpgI'm reprising my post of law review submission resources that I last posted in fall 2007. I assume that most of the information hasn't changed since then, but I haven't had a chance to recheck it.

So I thought I'd tap the powers of the blogosphere -- please let me know if any of the information below has changed. Also, a request to law review editors: Please put in the comments when you plan to begin reviewing articles for the spring submission season.

Article Submission Length Restrictions

Emory Law School's Library has a very useful chart of article length restrictions at the top 35 law reviews.

The general consensus is that many top law reviews have an article length limit of 35,000 words and a preference for no more than 25,000 words. Virginia Law Review has the strictest policy, with a limit (not just a preference) of under 25,000 words. All the rest have either no upper limit or a 35,000 to 40,000 word limit. As for preferences, the range is between 25,000 to 35,000 words, with most at 25,000.

Law Review Contact Information

1. Emory Law School's Library maintains contact information, including email addresses, for the top 25 law reviews.

2. JURIST has links to countless law review websites.

3. LexisNexis Directory of Law Reviews

Law Review Rankings

Washington & Lee's Law Library has a comprehensive ranking of law reviews based on citation counts.

Electronic Submissions

1. ExpressO provides for electronic submission to over 550 law reviews. However, a number of the top 25 law reviews still require either paper submissions or electronic submissions via their own website. For those law reviews not allowing an ExpressO electronic submission, ExpressO will print out the article and send it to these journals in hard copy. It costs extra for these submissions.

Chart of Law Review Submission Policies and Webpages

After the break is a chart of the submission policies and submission pages for several top law reviews.


LAW REVIEW EXPRESSO ONLINE SUBMISSION PAGE WORD LENGTH
California Electronic (Expresso Preferred) No 35,000 or less
Chicago Electronic (Expresso Preferred) No None
Columbia Hard Copy Yes 32,000 or less preferred; not more than 37,000
Cornell Electronic (Expresso Preferred) No 30,000 or less preferred
Duke Electronic (Expresso Preferred) No 35,000 or less
Fordham Electronic (Expresso Preferred) No None
Georgetown Electronic (No Preference) Yes 35,000 or less
George Washington Electronic No None
Harvard Hard Copy Yes 25,000 or less preferred; not more than 35,000
Illinois Electronic (Expresso Preferred) No None
Indiana Electronic No None
Iowa Electronic (Expresso Preferred) No None
Michigan Hard Copy Yes 25,000 or less strongly preferred
Minnesota Electronic (Expresso Preferred) No None
NYU Electronic (Expresso Preferred) No 35,000 or less preferred
North Carolina Electronic (Expresso Preferred) No 25,000 or less preferred; not more than 40,000
Northwestern Electronic (Expresso Preferred) No 35,000 or less
Notre Dame Electronic No None
University of Pennsylvania Hard Copy (prefers its own site) Yes 35,000 or less
Southern California Electronic (Expresso Preferred) No None
Stanford Electronic (prefers its own site) Yes 30,000 or less
Texas Electronic (Expresso Preferred) No None
UCLA Electronic (Expresso Preferred) No 35,000 or less
Vanderbilt Hard Copy No None
Virginia Electronic No 25,000 or less strongly preferred; not more than 30,000
William & Mary Hard Copy No None
Wisconsin Electronic (Expresso Preferred) No 37,000 or less
Yale Electronic (prefers its own site) Yes 30,000 or less preferred; 35,000+ strongly discouraged

Posted by Daniel J. Solove at February 21, 2008 03:47 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.concurringopinions.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/3259.

Comments

Georgetown's online submission form (at least a couple days ago) said to use Expresso instead when I logged in. I don't know if that's still true, but it's something to look for.

Posted by: Michael Risch at February 22, 2008 07:39 AM


I'm the outgoing Senior Articles Editor at The Georgetown Law Journal. Georgetown no longer uses its online submission page due to technical difficulties. We now accept submissions only through ExpressO or in hard copy.

Posted by: Hanah Volokh at February 22, 2008 02:30 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Authors

Daniel J. Solove

Website
Understanding Privacy

Kaimipono Wenger

Website
SSRN Page

Dave Hoffman

Website
SSRN Page

Nate Oman

Website
SSRN Page

Frank Pasquale

Website
SSRN Page

Deven Desai

Website
SSRN Page


Guests

William Birdthistle
Elaine Chiu
David Fontana
James Grimmelmann
Dan Kahan
Sam Kamin
Anita S. Krishnakumar
William McGeveran
Michael O'Shea






ad-logo3.jpg

blawg100_winner2.jpg

Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Craig Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Laura Heymann
Christine Hurt
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Greg Lastowka
Joseph Liu
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo PeƱalver
Neil RIchards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Paul Secunda
Peter Smith
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Robert Tsai
Steve Vladeck
Sarah Waldeck
Melissa Waters
Alfred Yen
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Jonathan Zittrain

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
Beltway Blogroll
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
Convictions
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
JD2B.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Letters
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian
Mirror of Justice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
Political Theory Daily Review
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog

Pajamas Media BlogRoll Member