Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Groundhog Day. (fp)

Banned in Tucson. (kw)

The Best and Worst of 2011 in Race and Law (kw)

Tortured to death for trespassing. (fp)

Drones of contention. (fp)

DOJ still coddling banks. (fp)

Creative destruction? Thank banks. (fp)

Blog about a new book, on how to talk to little girls--stressing smarts not cutes.   LAC

Macey on the heroic Rakoff. (fp)

Captured NY Fed. (fp)


solicitors

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Alice on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Rachel Karash on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • MBL on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • MBL on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • feathered_head on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Concernicus on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Ian on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Peterk on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Robert on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Three Oranges on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Paul Robichaux on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • JR on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Jan on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Mark on Physical Punishment and Parental Rights

    • Shag from Brookline on Omelets and Eggs
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

Law Professor Lateraling 101: Part 10 (“Should I Stay or Should I Go Now?”)

posted by Paul Secunda

Combat_rock_cover.jpgMore than just the song that I sang (poorly) to my wife at our wedding some ten years ago, the title of this post is the ultimate question you must answer in this lateral market process.

For some, the answer will be easy. The new school represents a jump in prestige, more research funding, better geographic location for family, a spouse has found a new job, or a family member is ill. Or it might be that you just can’t stand the people you work with anymore (and, BTW, they can’t stand you either). I know nothing about this last point.

But for some, the answer is not that easy at all. When I received my first lateral offer last year, it was a school that was basically on the same prestige level, in the same part of the country, and only slighter closer to my wife or my families. Another big issue for us, the presence of a religious community (more fellow Members of the Tribe) was also only slightly better.

In these types of situations, I think it behooves you to have a heart-to-heart with your current dean. Honestly explain the situation. This is an important conversation because not only do you want to see if the outstanding offer permits you to gain some perks through your newly-found leverage, but also it is nice to know whether or not you are truly valued by your institution.

Consider the following responses and tell me which one you would rather hear: “Congratulations. They are sure lucky to have a scholar and teacher on your level. Now, will you close the door. I was just in the middle of a record-breaking minesweeper game.” Or: “Wow [crying hysterically]. That really sucks for me and the school. I will do anything, short of dressing in opposite sex clothing or agreeing to student parking, to get you to stay here. Please. PLEASE!!!”


Now, it is unlikely you will get either of these exact responses from your dean, but before you start negotiation with him or her against the other offer, ask yourself how much you really want to stay at your current institution. And how much you really want to stay at your current institution probably depends on how you are treated there. I would not even bother seeking a counter-offer if you know that you are not staying.

Some might argue that even if you really don’t think there is much of a chance of staying at your current school, you should still see what you can get from your dean in order to play that off the offer from the other school. You could do that, but I would not recommend it. First of all, the law professor community exists in a very small world and it may get out that you played off the two sides when your decision was always clear. Also, if you engage in this type of hard bargaining only to leave your old school, you might not leave on good terms. And as I have told Dan Solove once if not a thousand times, “Don’t burn bridges unless you absolutely have to. You should have not shown your feelings by drenching that person in your sputum.”

So for me, because my first lateral offer did not present me with an obvious decision, I did have a talk with my dean and we worked out a package which would both increase my standing in the faculty and clearly established for me that I was valued by my institution. I did not then go back and re-negotiate with the other school, I just turned down that offer.

On the other hand, this year the offer I received was better in a way that my current school could not compete against. Better for religious reasons, better as far as being in an urban area, and better because of the nature of the law I teach and the fact that people in these parts still have trouble telling the different between unionism, communism, and homosexuality. So this time, although I think I came to fair terms with the dean at my new school, I did not come back and seek to get a better offer at my current school. I just told my dean that I was leaving (and be sure you tell the two involved deans first before making it public news because you never exactly know where that Leiter guy lurks) and appreciated all the school had done for me for the last six years.

And because mutual respect still exists on both sides, my last months here at Ole Miss have been pleasant (except for the raspberries I have been getting from colleagues who have had to take over my committee assignments). My thoughts now turn to such trivialities as selling my home, buying a home, figuring out where to place the kids in school, and basically starting my life over (and that of my family’s) from scratch. Also they turn to how in the hell am I going to survive mountains of snow and treacherous, icy roads come next winter?

All of this is no big deal after one survives the lateral market. Really, the whole things is like American Gladiators for law professors, with Volokh and Balkin instead of Fury and Wolf.


 February 15, 2008 at 11:56 am   Posted in: Law School (Hiring & Laterals)   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (7)

  1. Paul Horwitz - February 15, 2008 at 12:18 pm

    Dude — you sang “Should I Stay Or Should I Go” to your wife at your WEDDING? I’m sure it was romantic and stuff, but was that exactly the moment to express doubt and indecision in song?

    Seriously now, good series, Paul.

  2. Paul - February 15, 2008 at 12:25 pm

    I’m happy to report, Paul, that Mindy never had the chance to answer the song’s question because I so fouled up the lyrics that it sounded something like: “Should I stay or la la la la . . .exactly who I’m supposed to be. . . don’t even know which clothes fit me.”

    I think she was more worried about my mental health than anything else.

    See you soon in Chapel Hill where we can continue to impale the Garcetti vampire with wooden stakes!

  3. Bruce Boyden - February 15, 2008 at 5:02 pm

    Also they turn to how in the hell am I going to survive mountains of snow and treacherous, icy roads come next winter?

    They’re predicting another 12 inches for Sunday. On the plus side, I hear this year is atypical.

  4. Joseph Slater - February 15, 2008 at 10:07 pm

    Paul:

    Any video clips of that singing you would like to share? A little editing and it would be YouTube gold. Maybe even without any editing. . . .

  5. Maryland Conservatarian - February 16, 2008 at 1:37 pm

    “…and the fact that people in these parts still have trouble telling the different between unionism, communism, and homosexuality.”

    But come November, I’ll bet they’ll have no trouble telling the difference between “hope…audacity…change” and “substance”.

    (and does gratuitously slamming the local populace still keep the Bridges smoke-free?)

  6. David Case - February 16, 2008 at 1:45 pm

    Dude — you’ve been watching American Gladiators? Increased committee work raspberries are nothing next to knowing the names of spandex wearing American Gladiators raspberries.

  7. Chris - February 18, 2008 at 5:08 pm

    I clicked on the first link, hoping it would be Paul singing. Alas, no.

    Also, I’m with David: I say we call you Fury until you leave.

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Derek Bambauer
Gabriella Coleman
andré douglas pond cummings
David Gray
Brishen Rogers
Joseph Turow
Elizabeth A. Wilson













Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress