<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Privacy Rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/new_privacy_ran.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/new_privacy_ran.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:20:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Orin Kerr</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/new_privacy_ran.html/comment-page-1#comment-50890</link>
		<dc:creator>Orin Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 07:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/01/new-privacy-rankings.html#comment-50890</guid>
		<description>The reasons for why the U.S. did poorly seem rather bizarre to me.  If I&#039;m not mistaken, one of the big ones is that according to Privacy International, &quot;There is no right to privacy in the U.S. Constitution.&quot;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reasons for why the U.S. did poorly seem rather bizarre to me.  If I&#8217;m not mistaken, one of the big ones is that according to Privacy International, &#8220;There is no right to privacy in the U.S. Constitution.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deven</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/new_privacy_ran.html/comment-page-1#comment-50889</link>
		<dc:creator>Deven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/01/new-privacy-rankings.html#comment-50889</guid>
		<description>Thanks guys. Good points. Still the detailed listing of privacy-related laws and practices for the countries is a good idea. The resulting map may indicate that the listings could be suspect of course. Nonetheless having a starting point for so many areas that touch on privacy can help. If anyone digs into the method more please speak up as such an effort could lead to other ways to analyze a country&#039;s approach to privacy.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys. Good points. Still the detailed listing of privacy-related laws and practices for the countries is a good idea. The resulting map may indicate that the listings could be suspect of course. Nonetheless having a starting point for so many areas that touch on privacy can help. If anyone digs into the method more please speak up as such an effort could lead to other ways to analyze a country&#8217;s approach to privacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryland Conservatarian</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/new_privacy_ran.html/comment-page-1#comment-50888</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryland Conservatarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 01:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/01/new-privacy-rankings.html#comment-50888</guid>
		<description>&quot;... but this sort of map makes me pretty suspiscious that the approach is more than a bit ideologically charged.&quot;

..an apt understatement. Gotta wonder about a group of so-called privacy gurus that can&#039;t even hazard a guess as to privacy rights in Cuba.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; but this sort of map makes me pretty suspiscious that the approach is more than a bit ideologically charged.&#8221;</p>
<p>..an apt understatement. Gotta wonder about a group of so-called privacy gurus that can&#8217;t even hazard a guess as to privacy rights in Cuba.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/new_privacy_ran.html/comment-page-1#comment-50887</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/01/new-privacy-rankings.html#comment-50887</guid>
		<description>Might we not wonder if the standards used are really the right ones (that is, the ones we should care about) when apparently _no_ country is at the top level and only Greece (!?) comes close?  I&#039;m certainly in favor of strong privacy standards in some areas of life and think there has been a lot of back-sliding, but this sort of map makes me pretty suspiscious that the approach is more than a bit ideologically charged.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might we not wonder if the standards used are really the right ones (that is, the ones we should care about) when apparently _no_ country is at the top level and only Greece (!?) comes close?  I&#8217;m certainly in favor of strong privacy standards in some areas of life and think there has been a lot of back-sliding, but this sort of map makes me pretty suspiscious that the approach is more than a bit ideologically charged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
