<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Abramowicz&#8217;s Predictocracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/michael_abramow.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/michael_abramow.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/michael_abramow.html/comment-page-1#comment-50548</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/01/michael-abramowiczs-predictocracy.html#comment-50548</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a nice article on Slate on the &quot;momentum-ocracy&quot; that has historically declared presidential candidates victors before a small fraction of delegates are officially chosen.  I look forward to reading the book to see how it deals with the possibly untoward effects of early judgments cascading into self-fulfilling prophecies.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a nice article on Slate on the &#8220;momentum-ocracy&#8221; that has historically declared presidential candidates victors before a small fraction of delegates are officially chosen.  I look forward to reading the book to see how it deals with the possibly untoward effects of early judgments cascading into self-fulfilling prophecies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miriam Cherry</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/michael_abramow.html/comment-page-1#comment-50547</link>
		<dc:creator>Miriam Cherry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/01/michael-abramowiczs-predictocracy.html#comment-50547</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read Michael&#039;s book and it is, indeed, definitely a worthy addition to your bookshelf, Dan!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read Michael&#8217;s book and it is, indeed, definitely a worthy addition to your bookshelf, Dan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deven</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/michael_abramow.html/comment-page-1#comment-50546</link>
		<dc:creator>deven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/01/michael-abramowiczs-predictocracy.html#comment-50546</guid>
		<description>The book looks fascinating. For those looking for what I think is an opposing view, check Taleb&#039;s Black Swans. A short version of the argument is here http://www.forbes.com/2007/05/23/nicholas-taleb-innovation-tech-cz_07rev_nt_0524taleb.html

I have not read Predictocracy but given the pitch, Taleb&#039;s article &quot;You Can&#039;t Predict Who Will Change The World&quot; in Forbes (link above). Put differently the two views may be passing each other but they seem related though opposed.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The book looks fascinating. For those looking for what I think is an opposing view, check Taleb&#8217;s Black Swans. A short version of the argument is here <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2007/05/23/nicholas-taleb-innovation-tech-cz_07rev_nt_0524taleb.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.forbes.com/2007/05/23/nicholas-taleb-innovation-tech-cz_07rev_nt_0524taleb.html</a></p>
<p>I have not read Predictocracy but given the pitch, Taleb&#8217;s article &#8220;You Can&#8217;t Predict Who Will Change The World&#8221; in Forbes (link above). Put differently the two views may be passing each other but they seem related though opposed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin George</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/michael_abramow.html/comment-page-1#comment-50545</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/01/michael-abramowiczs-predictocracy.html#comment-50545</guid>
		<description>He is, of course, also guest-blogging about the book over on The VC at the moment - http://volokh.com/posts/1201537799.shtml

Worthy of a link, I&#039;m sure.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is, of course, also guest-blogging about the book over on The VC at the moment &#8211; <a href="http://volokh.com/posts/1201537799.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://volokh.com/posts/1201537799.shtml</a></p>
<p>Worthy of a link, I&#8217;m sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
