the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

Search

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

lr_jkr9_12_08supremecourt.jpg

ad-logo5.jpg

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

Law-Rev-Forum-2.jpg

law-rev-contents2.jpg

Law-Prof-Blog-Census.jpg

Categories

Accounting
Administrative Announcements
Administrative Law
Admiralty
Advertising
Agricultural Law
Anonymity
Antitrust
Architecture
Articles and Books
Bankruptcy
Behavioral Law and Economics
Bioethics
Blogging
Book Reviews
Capital Punishment
Civil Procedure
Civil Rights
Conferences
Constitutional Law
Consumer Protection Law
Contract Law & Beyond
Corporate Finance
Corporate Law
Criminal Law
Criminal Procedure
Culture
Current Events
Cyberlaw
DRM
Economic Analysis of Law
Education
Empirical Analysis of Law
Employment Law
Environmental Law
Estates and Trusts
Evidence Law
Family Law
Feminism and Gender
First Amendment
Food
Google & Search Engines
Health Law
History of Law
Humor
Immigration
Insurance Law
Intellectual Property
International & Comparative Law
Interviews
Jurisprudence
Law and Humanities
Law and Inequality
Law and Psychology
Law Practice
Law Professor Blogger Census
Law Rev (Boston College)
Law Rev (Boston University)
Law Rev (California)
Law Rev (Chicago)
Law Rev (Columbia)
Law Rev (Cornell)
Law Rev (Duke)
Law Rev (Emory)
Law Rev (Fordham)
Law Rev (Georgetown)
Law Rev (GW)
Law Rev (Harvard)
Law Rev (Illinois)
Law Rev (Indiana)
Law Rev (Iowa)
Law Rev (Michigan)
Law Rev (Minnesota)
Law Rev (Northwestern)
Law Rev (Notre Dame)
Law Rev (NYU)
Law Rev (Penn)
Law Rev (S Cal)
Law Rev (Stanford)
Law Rev (Texas)
Law Rev (UCLA)
Law Rev (Vanderbilt)
Law Rev (Virginia)
Law Rev (Wash U)
Law Rev (Wm & Mary)
Law Rev (Yale)
Law Rev Contents
Law Rev Forum
Law School
Law School (Hiring & Laterals)
Law School (Law Reviews)
Law School (Rankings)
Law School (Scholarship)
Law School (Teaching)
Law Student Discussions
Law Talk
Legal Ethics
Legal Theory
Media Law
Movies & Television
Philosophy of Social Science
Politics
Privacy
Privacy (Consumer Privacy)
Privacy (Electronic Surveillance)
Privacy (Gossip & Shaming)
Privacy (ID Theft)
Privacy (Law Enforcement)
Privacy (Medical)
Privacy (National Security)
Property Law
Race
Religion
Reparations
Science Fiction
Second Amendment
Securities
Social Network Websites
Sociology of Law
Supreme Court
Tax
Teaching
Technology
Tort Law
Web 2.0
Weird
Wiki
Wills, Trusts, and Estates

Archives

October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

 

« Introducing Guest Blogger Russell Korobkin | Main | Fabulists and Cognitive Illiberalism »

December 02, 2007

Metcalfe's Law vs. WealthSpace

posted by Frank Pasquale

If you're getting sick of FaceBook's privacy practices, and have a high net worth, you might opt into new social networking sites for the wealthy...call them WealthSpaces. Founders of such sites have found the balance between openness and access tricky:

"It's very difficult to build a network based solely on wealth," says Stephen Martiros, a managing director of CCC Alliance, a coalition of rich families based in Boston. "You might start with a few wealthy people, but as you grow it eventually reverts to the mean. And once that happens, the wealthy leave."
A Geneva member [of aSmallWorld, another social network for the wealthy] wrote: "One of my friends, a funny old-timer here, told me that the site has lowered so much its level, that she has invited her maids."

Funny indeed. While the social networking of the rich and famous may seem a silly topic, the dilemmas of these sites actually reflect a larger tension within social networking.

Metcalfe's Law suggests that "the value of a network exponentially grows with each additional node."* Therefore, you'd think the name of the game for social networking would be to take advantage of such network effects. However, Cory Doctorow notes that mega-openness creates embarrassing conflicts between the "different selves" presented at work, home, and other social situations:

Having watched the rise and fall of SixDegrees, Friendster, and the many other proto-hominids that make up the evolutionary chain leading to Facebook, MySpace, et al, I'm inclined to think that these systems are subject to a [a new law]: "Adding more users to a social network increases the probability that it will put you in an awkward social circumstance." Perhaps we can call this "boyd's Law" for danah boyd, the social scientist who has studied many of these networks from the inside as a keen-eyed net-anthropologist and who has described the many ways in which social software does violence to sociability in a series of sharp papers.
***
Every "social networking service" has had this problem and every user I've spoken to has been frustrated by it. I think that's why these services are so volatile: why we're so willing to flee from Friendster and into MySpace's loving arms; from MySpace to Facebook. It's socially awkward to refuse to add someone to your friends list -- but removing someone from your friend-list is practically a declaration of war.

Perhaps just as "sticky wages" gum up the economy, "sticky online friendships" will forever derail the panoptic dream of an online social world precisely mirroring the real one. I'm not saddened by that possibility.

Hat Tip: Sam Ladner.

*To be precise: "[T]he value of a telecommunications network is proportional to the square of the number of users of the system." Given the importance of network effects to the success of social networking sites, many have thought that some variant of Metcalfe's law also applies to them.

Posted by Frank Pasquale at December 2, 2007 05:33 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.concurringopinions.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/2838.

Comments

Interesting post! This looks like a version of the "snob effect" that economists talk about for particular goods--where the good loses value to certain consumers as it gains popularity with others.

Posted by: Dudley at December 2, 2007 07:43 PM


Metcalfe's Law does not state that the value of a network grows exponentially with the number of users. Reed's Law does. Metcalfe's Law says that the growth in value is quadratic, not exponential.

In any event, both are probably wrong. Tilly and Odlyzko provide a convincing argument that value increases as n log n. Their argument is compatible with Zipf's Law, and thus with lots of Long Tail arguments.

Posted by: James Grimmelmann at December 2, 2007 08:42 PM


You've got a couple different things here, I think. One is about software architectures of exclusivity and their failure, which maps pretty well to how fashion trends are found and then crash under their own weight. I'm not sure who to cite for that, Bordieu I suppose... The other is about software architectures and their failure to recreate the social conditions that allow individuals to perform multiple roles in discrete social milieus. That's kind of a Goffman problem.

Posted by: greglas at December 2, 2007 08:49 PM


Dudley: nice connection! I wonder if the network is the snob good, or perhaps the profile within the network. Or the "quality" of friends.

James: Many thanks for the clarification.

Greg: I like the point about software architectures that allow users to perform many different roles--are they really liberating? The rise of "gated communities" in cyberspace leads me to cast a slightly skeptical eye on an insistence on autonomy in presenting the self.

Perhaps just as no person is a hero to his or her valet, the leveling pressure to present one coherent self in cyberspace helps consolidate the multiple selves we develop to deal with increasing levels of inequality and social fragmentation. I don't like the idea of a "cyberspace class transvestite" jetsetting with pals from "aSmallWorld" while "keeping it real" on MySpace. As Thomas Frank suggests in Commodify Your Dissent, that type of "chameleoning" works to disguise and reinforce class divisions, not to bridge them.

On the other hand, perhaps the pressure to consolidate a self on some dominant social networking platform will intensify the artificiality of presented personalities. As Alessandra Stanley noted today in a sharp column on the "Classless Utopia of Reality TV," many "principals [of reality TV], whose romances and kitchen quarrels furnish plotlines, are not really actors, but neither are they ordinary people exactly; they are a new hybrid of semiprofessional personalities who play themselves on camera." But that may not be a bad thing--just a reminder of the limits of the online self.

Posted by: Frank at December 2, 2007 09:16 PM


Hi Dudley,
Greglas is right -- Bourdieu can explain all of this. The rich will always have the "right" membership in the "right" clubs not because they are psychic, but because they themselves determine what the "right" club is. This is the changing face of economic domination, as exhibited through material goods.

"Elite" networks will always change, just as "elite" luxury goods always change. Carry a Louis Vuitton bag with all those logos? How declasse. How gauche. Everyone knows the "right" bag doesn't show off its logo. It is the same with social networks.

Posted by: Sam at December 3, 2007 05:50 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Authors

Daniel J. Solove

Website
Understanding Privacy

Kaimipono Wenger

Website
SSRN Page

Dave Hoffman

Website
SSRN Page

Nate Oman

Website
SSRN Page

Frank Pasquale

Website
SSRN Page

Deven Desai

Website
SSRN Page

Michael O'Shea

Website
SSRN Page

Sarah Waldeck

Website
SSRN Page

Lawrence Cunningham

Website
SSRN Page

Danielle Citron

Website
SSRN Page

Jaya Ramji-Nogales

Website
SSRN Page


Guests

Robert Ahdieh
Neil H. Buchanan
Miriam Cherry
Susan Kuo
Jonathan Lipson
Paul Ohm
Geoffrey Rapp
Susan Scafidi
Howard Wasserman
Timothy Zick






ad-logo3.jpg

blawg100_winner2.jpg

Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Craig Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Dan Kahan
Sam Kamin
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Joseph Liu
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo PeƱalver
Neil RIchards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Paul Secunda
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Robert Tsai
Steve Vladeck
Sarah Waldeck
Melissa Waters
Alfred Yen
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Jonathan Zittrain

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
Beltway Blogroll
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
Convictions
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
JD2B.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Letters
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian
Mirror of Justice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
Political Theory Daily Review
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog

Pajamas Media BlogRoll Member