Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


New Supreme Court website (DJS)

A digital-age bird man for Alcatraz?  Tweeting oneself to jail. (DJS)

NYT: How privacy vanishes online (DJS)

Orin Kerr critiques the 11th Circuit on email and the Fourth Amendment (DJS)

Identification by your germs (DJS)

Interview of Professor William Stuntz (DJS)

Professor Eric Goldman on the proposed federal Anti-SLAPP Bill (DJS)

Important advice for new profs: DO NOT make jokes (online or otherwise) about killing your students. (kw)

FTC Report: ID theft is down but overall fraud is up (DJS)

Balkin on reconciliation vs. filibuster (DJS)

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments

    • Stillwaiting on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Anon on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • plentyofrejections on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Anon on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Anon on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • PublishingProf on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Anon on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Howard Wasserman on Where Things Stand

    • Gerard Magliocca on Where Things Stand

    • dave hoffman on Where Things Stand

    • anon on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Keder on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Aspirant on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Gerard Magliocca on Where Things Stand

    • dave hoffman on Where Things Stand

  •  

    Site Meter

Has the Legal Blogosphere Stabilized?

posted by Daniel Solove

chart-growth1.gifOver at the VC, Orin Kerr wonders whether the legal blogosphere has stabilized:

The major new blog was David Lat’s Above the Law, which has quickly become highly trafficked. But there were surprisingly few new blogs that took off, and many more blogs that looked bright in 2006 but became mostly or entirely dormant in 2007. Most of the major blogs have kept going, and readership on the whole has been roughly stable. But my sense is that there hasn’t been a lot of growth in overall law blog postings and readership.

Orin concludes: “Perhaps law blogging has hit a saturation point. Only so many people are interested in reading these sorts of things, and maybe that crowd is pretty stable and hard to grow.”

I think Orin is right — partially. Here’s where I think he’s right. Many blogs have very small audiences. Only a few law blogs have more than 1000 readers per day. My guess is that the number of law blogs with more than 1000 readers has not increased dramatically over the past few years. There are so many blogs that a person can read, and many folks have found their favorites now and are content. Of course, there’s always the possibility of an exciting new blog on the block that will quickly attract an audience. But in our experience at Concurring Opinions, it takes time and lots of work to build an audience.

But, I do think that in the future, we’ll see steady growth in blog readership — not the exponential growth of the past, but a decent growth. At Concurring Opinions, our readership has grown a lot over the past two years. In 2006, we were averaging about 50,000 to 60,000 visits per month; in 2007, we’re averaging 80,000 to 100,000 visits per month. That’s about an 80% increase in visits. I don’t think we’ll continue with such a steep growth, but I do hope and expect our readership to continue to grow.

Some predictions for the future:

1. The rich will get richer (or at least stay rich). The popular blogs will continue to grow their audience. There will be 10-20 blogs that have a sizable readership, and that number will remain relatively stable. Only a few new blogs might break into this club.

2. More law professors and lawyers will blog. Many will do so temporarily as guests, as several group blogs are hosting many guest bloggers (at Concurring Opinions, we’ve had over 50 guest bloggers in the past two years). There will be a number of people each year who drop out of the blogosphere, but I think that number is stabilizing — those that tried out blogging early on because it was the new cool fad but couldn’t sustain their interest have by and large dropped out. As more people try out blogging as guests, a few will be bitten by the blog bug and will stick around the blogosphere on a permanent basis.


3. In the law professor blogosphere, as new professors enter the academy each year, I expect a number of them will eventually take up blogging in order to increase their exposure or because they had blogs in law school and want to continue on blogging. So I expect growth in the number of law professor bloggers, but it will be a slower and more steady growth than the more dramatic increases of years past.

4. Blog readership will grow steadily. Many new law professors and law professor wannabes are avid blog readers, looking for the latest ideas, scholarly buzz, or career advice that is abundant in the blogosphere. This also applies to all legal blogs. Many law students in law school or just graduating from law school are blog readers. My sense is that those entering into the study of law or the legal profession are more likely to be blog readers than those retiring or departing. This means more readers each year, which as I predict above, will largely gravitate toward the existing established blogs.


 December 19, 2007 at 10:41 pm   Posted in: Blogging   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (1)

  1. Julia M. Wei, Real Estate Attorney - January 4, 2008 at 4:53 pm

    I have to agree. I have blogged on California real estate and mortgage law (an admittedly dry topic) since 2006, and it is a fairly low-traffic endeavor. However, the majority of my traffic is not from regular readers utilizing a service like Bloglines, but instead keyword searchers specifically looking for things on “foreclosures in California” which has to be the highest search term for the DirtLaw blog. Given the subprime climate, I expect that trend to continue.

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Nate Oman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Robert Ahdieh
Lisa Fairfax
Michelle Harner
Sherrilyn Ifill
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Tuan Samahon
Alfred Yen










Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Ann Bartow
Adam Benforado
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
David Fagundes
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
John Ip
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
David Post
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Susan Scafidi
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress