Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 


advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Most under-appreciated thing about Warren Buffett: he built Berkshire to last well beyond him.  (LAC, at BRK annual meeting via Motley Fool, here.)

University governance as a new topic of public discussion.

An unusual profile of Mary Anne Franks (kw)

Aggressive copyright litigation run amok. (fp)

USA Today's Matt Krantz quoting me on Warren Buffett joining Twitter.  (LAC)

Private prisons? Why, sure! What could possibly go wrong? (kw)

TNR profiles Susan Crawford (kw)

Berkshire Hathaway is bigger than Warren Buffett.  Manual of Ideas (LAC).

Guns don't shoot people, kitchen appliances shoot people (kw)

Via Glom, Sat Eve Post review of The Essays of Warren Buffett.


Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Shag from Brookline on National Referenda

    • PrometheeFeu on Tumblr, Porn, and Internet Intermediaries

    • Kyle on Contract Evolution

    • Bruce Boyden on Tumblr, Porn, and Internet Intermediaries

    • Orin Kerr on The Varying Use of Legal Scholarship by the U.S. Supreme Court across Issues

    • Guy Spier on Symposium Redux: Essays and Lessons

    • John Mihaljevic on Is Berkshire Hathaway Really a Psychology Experiment?

    • Sy Lorne on The Many Audiences of Buffett's Letters

    • Lawrence Cunningham on The Skeptical Principal

    • Lawrence Cunningham on Berkshire's Dividend Policy: Part II

    • Lawrence Cunningham on The Many Audiences of Buffett's Letters

    • Lawrence Cunningham on Deals without Bankers: Salomon and Benjamin Moore

    • Brett Bellmore on National Referenda

    • Gerard Magliocca on National Referenda

    • mls on National Referenda
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

ECCO Shoes, Transaction Costs, Reputational Norms, the Limits of the Legal System, and Internet Disintermediation

posted by Jeffrey Lipshaw

On October 15, 2007, at the recommendation of my wife, I bought a pair of ECCO shoes at what, for me, was an ungodly amount to pay for a pair of shoes. The reason for the investment is that we live in a city now, and I do a lot more walking. (For comparative purposes, I buy all of my shirts from Lands’ End, and my pants are whatever Dockers – pants for the bigger butted man, as my daughter Arielle and Dave Barry say – are on the table at Costco. So buying shoes at a chi-chi store on Newbury Street was an unnatural act.)

About six weeks later, I happened to notice that the heel had worn through. I wear these shoes a fair amount, but it didn’t seem to me that a pair of shoes at this ungodly price should wear through in six weeks. You can’t just take shoes back to the ECCO store, however. You have to order a prepaid bag from customer service, and send the shoes away to an outsourced “warranty service,” which makes a unilateral judgment whether ECCO will do something about the problem. I duly packed them up and send them away.

The warranty service received them yesterday, and the following is now posted online under my repair ticket: “WEAR IS NOT A DEFECT NORMAL WEAR NO DEFECT.”

From time to time, I teach contracts! I think there’s at least a fact issue whether a sole wearing through in six weeks of relatively normal wear on a pair of $190 shoes constitutes a breach of the implied warranty of merchantability under Section 2-314 of the U.C.C. I channeled Ronald Coase a few minutes ago, and he told me that in the absence of transaction costs, clear default rules, and freedom of contract, the initial allocation of legal rights as between ECCO and me would be irrelevant to an efficient outcome. And when I channeled Frank Easterbrook, he referred me to Hill v. Gateway 2000, and told me I was bound by a warranty disclaimer that was available on the ECCO website if I had read the sales slip and clicked my way through to find it before I wore the shoes.

I am not finding either of those results particularly satisfying at this minute. But wait! I also channeled Lisa Bernstein who has studied diamond brokers in New York City, and they don’t rely on formal law. Do a deal, say “mazel v’broche” (luck and blessing), and reputational norms will do the rest. Hmm. I wonder what that means, if anything, in a world of internet information disintermediation. I’m kind of a “you pays your money and you takes your chances” on this kind of stuff anyway. Personally, that’s the last pair of ECCO shoes for me. But you can make your own decision.


 December 20, 2007 at 9:27 am   Posted in: Contract Law & Beyond   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (21)

  1. Logical Extremes - December 20, 2007 at 10:55 am

    I bought a pair of ECCO boots several years ago, and had them nicely broken in but still in great condition when the soles were worn down. I tried to take them to get re-soled, but apparently most modern shoes are not manufactured in a way that allows them to be re-soled. You’ll have to look long and hard to find shoes that are compatible with environmentally-friendly reuse. So I won’t buy ECCO again either, but for a different reason. Sorry, I couldn’t channel any cases that would have helped this situation.

  2. Nat - December 20, 2007 at 1:02 pm

    Try posting/email The Consumerist (http://consumerist.com) : wide distribution & I think they’ve had a pretty good success rate at helping consumers with such issues.

  3. David Meyers - December 20, 2007 at 8:15 pm

    If there was a short interval between purchase a your warranty claim you may have a good claim here. Take this to small-claims and disclaimer or not you can’t lose. Be sure to name both the retailer AND ECCO. The retailer is not going to be too happy and certainly doesn’t want to go to sc court. There is case law and there is small-claims court. They are not the same.

    Despite the small amount the issue makes ME angry. It would be an interesting exercise for you if you have the time.

  4. Jamison Colburn - December 20, 2007 at 9:34 pm

    One quick counter point on the evolution of brands (and companies): I bought a pair of Ecco shoes (from a shop on Charles Street, as a matter of fact) about 12 years ago. Still have ‘em, still love ‘em, and many pairs of shoes have come and gone during their “useful lives.” Jeff’s experience is much like my own with recent shoe purchases, though. . . .

  5. Bill - December 20, 2007 at 11:19 pm

    I’m surprised that ecco didn’t just replace ‘em. I have 2 pairs of eccos–one is 3 years old, the other is 7 years old, and the soles in both show no signs of quitting.

  6. John Schinina - July 1, 2008 at 5:24 pm

    On September 2007 I both a pair of ECCO sandals at the Nostrom store in the international mall in Tampa, Florida. My experience has not been great. The construction and quality is very poor. I have repaired the straping a number of times and the material the sole is made of, marks my flooring when wet. I expected better, since the price for the sandals were not cheap. I have many different brands of sandals that I still wear and have never repaired. Sorry, John Schinina

  7. Richard Ahern - January 3, 2009 at 11:19 am

    I recently joined the ranks of the ECCO-amazed as I watched the heels on a pair of black dress shoes disintegrate in a single day. On taking them back to my shoe dealer (Richey Shoes in McClain, VA),I stood in line as the customer in front of me told the salesman that the soles on a pair of hers had just done the same thing. The salesman observed that it was an issue with most of the ECCOs he sold and produced from the back room prepaid bags that ECCO apparently provided to send the shoes out for “possible repair.” When we asked why he continued to sell a product when he knew this was a problem, he simply shrugged and smiled. We left the store amazed; and ECCO and Richey’s lost two more customers.

  8. Fredericka - June 16, 2009 at 11:44 am

    I have (or, “had”) a pair of Shakers. They were not worn much, and they were very well cared for. The soles showed zero sign of wear. The tread was fully intact. I had looked at them top and bottom no longer than one month ago. One day I wore them and noticed something flapping suddenly. I picked up my foot and discovered a whole chunk of the sole was missing. I looked at the other sole, and a chunk (a large chunk!) was missing there, too. These soles did not “wear out,” they disintegrated – suddenly. The shoes went to Nu-Shoes and came back: “out of warranty” and “new soles will not bond to the shoe.” They sent me a $25 voucher/discount thing for my next purchase of Eccos!!!! Ha ha ha!!! I have now called Ecco back at 800-886-3226. They suggested I send the shoes to them at 16 Delta Drive, Londonderry, New Hampshire 03053 – after they gave me an RMA number. They would not pay for shipping. The woman I spoke to said that $25 was their standard compensation for a shoe out of warranty. This shoe should have easily lasted 10 years. The horrible thing is, these are the most comfortable & perfect-fitting shoes I’ve ever owned. They had about 2 years’ worth of wearing, tops! Next I’m going to talk to a higher-up. I got her voice mail, and she sounds tense and harried … no wonder. I want to know what’s really going on. Are they still making shoes with this defect or not? If they’re not, and if they’ll refund the full purchase price, I MAY buy another pair eventually, although the fit and materials seem to have cheapened since a bought this pair. A friend who bought his last April is having the same trouble, so it’s NOT because mine were older.

  9. Ecco Homo - September 22, 2009 at 7:39 pm

    I owned several pairs of Eccos, dress and casual (Cross). The soles on a couple pairs disintegrated, even when I hadn’t worn them for several months. I thought it was my bad luck so I bought new pairs of the same line. Seeing the same problem again, with other shoes this time, I took two of the pairs to Nordstrom’s, where I bought them. The sales person there told me that Ecco shoes have a problem wherein the latex (or is it the polyurethane?) in the sole disintegrates even when the shoe is sitting on the shelf; they sent it in to Ecco and after speaking to them a couple times, they are sending me replacements.

    My question is: are the replacements (i.e., new shoes/models) any better than the old ones? Are they as likely as the old to disintegrate even while just sitting on the shelf? Has Ecco fixed the quality problem or am I going to have to confront this issue once again in the next several months? What has been your experience?

    Ecco the company simply has lost all credibility with me.

  10. Brandis McLaughlin - January 26, 2010 at 2:30 pm

    Seeing as how Ecco prides itself on being “environmentally friendly,” there may be method in the madness: After a certain amount of time, the synthetic components in the shoes break down and decompose, returning to the earth rather than clogging up landfills. You’ve unfortunately experienced a premature initiation of the biodegradable failsafe! ;)

    Or not.

    But seriously – for Ecco to get into a contract/warranty argument with you over a pair of shoes that probably didn’t cost that much for Ecco to manufacture in the first place, that’s just not good business. There’s a point where bean-counting and legal maneuvering start to cost more than they save with respect to continued sales and customer goodwill. I think that’s what your friend meant by “reputational norms.”

  11. rc - February 17, 2010 at 2:22 pm

    Several years ago I bought a pair of ECCO shoes on the recommendation of a friend. They were well made and comfortable and fairly expensive, around $125. Since I have many pairs of shoes I do not wear the same pair very often. After about 2 years the soles of my like new ECCO shoes began to come apart in large chunks. I contacted them and sent them in for inspection and a few weeks later they told me to order a new pair of shoes free of charge.
    Well that pair is now about 3 years old and worn very little, and AGAIN the soles started breaking apart. This time when I sent them in for inspection I was told that they were ” out of warranty” and would not be replaced! I will be buying many more shoes for myself and my family in the coming years but rest assured that they will not be ECCOs!!
    P.S. I have many pairs of shoes that are much older and a lot less expensive than the ECCOs in question and not one of them are coming apart! SCREW ECCO.

  12. M. Rosenbaum - March 1, 2010 at 5:44 pm

    many years ago i bought two pairs of ecco shoes on sale. i didnt wear them for months. when i did i found the soles to become “mushy” and pieces to stick to the floor. Imagine walking in shoes that keep sticking to the floor and sidewalk. I reported this to ecco. they told me to go to a shoe store and find something of theirs to replace them. I found a pair of $200+ hiking boots. the soles had a thin yello skin on them that wore out on the second hike. the rest of the soles crombled within a dozen hikes. I wrote to ecco and they said they wouldnt do any more about this. I called the better business bureau and they said that the company is based in denmark and so they are out of the bbb terrain. I have tried to find someone to help me with this but no goverment agency responds. If you look up ecco on the web you find a lot of entries for them. they are cleaning up!!!. this is an outrage. they keep making money and ripping people off. I still have the boots and a few pairs of shoes I bought in thrift shopps-all with the same problem.I hope someone can expose this company.

  13. m. Rosenbaum - March 14, 2010 at 11:55 am

    here I am again. I have the pair of boots mentioned above and about three pairs of shoes which i bought in thrift shops. I fantasized that someone would read my notes above and say” I’m taking them to court let me have the footwear for evidence.” but that didnt happen.
    311 was no help. Cuomo’s office doesn’t do referrels. Ill try DeBlasios office. If noone helps me Ill throw them out.
    I bought the first two pairs of shoes about 15-20 years ago!! They have been ripping people off this long!!!

  14. Mark Horridge - March 29, 2010 at 2:26 am

    Just Google
    ecco soles fall apart

    to learn more about this cynical and unscrupulous company

  15. karim omar - December 10, 2010 at 2:20 pm

    I have a serious problem with ecco shoe 2 in 2 men , i went to ecco branded shop few days i got it , but they did not solve the problem however the shoe wounds some of the toes .

    any idea about escalation putting in consideration that i sent twice emails in their Customer service with no reply ,

    i will send soon the full story .

    any ideas ?

    regards

  16. Tom W - December 26, 2010 at 11:24 am

    I had the same problem with my Ecco shoes. I bought them several years ago but wore them only infrequently and for dress occasions. The tops are excellent, but the soles and heels are absolute junk. I considered complaining to the company to try to get redress but after reading the blogs about how difficult it was I decided to not go this route but just add to the long list of complainers. I do not understand why Ecco and the companies who carry the shoes are apparently not doing much of anything to resolve the problem and give an iota of satisfaction to the buyer. Again, the shoes are stinkers, won’t last, heels and soles will fall apart with only minimal wear, impossible to have traditional repair (shoe Shop), and no help from company or sellers.

  17. Paula - September 7, 2011 at 2:44 pm

    Upon noticeing black rubber flakes on floor,I removed my Black Ecco sandels. What the..The soles near the heel had completly split all the way up to the top. On both shoes.The flakes were the insides of the shoe sole. Yes they were about 4 years old.I wore them about 20 times.Never had a shoe do this even cheap ones. I first thought the kids had been playing with them and had broke them. Now I know its a problem. Have sent them a Email with photos of the shoes. Will see what they say.

  18. Joyce - September 23, 2011 at 9:59 am

    I bought a pair of ECCO shakers a week ago and wore them to work today for the FIRST time. As I was walking back from the coffee area, I noticed something flapping on my shoe. I immediately thought my Newfoundland puppy chewed my shoe even though I had them in my closet. I turned both shoes over and discovered the soles are coming apart in huge chunks. I am so disappointed since they are extremely comfortable. I purchased many ECCO shoes over the years and never had a problem.

  19. Cathy - March 20, 2012 at 2:17 pm

    I bought a pair of Ecco sandals (not Cosmo) about 4 years ago and have worn them infrequently (perhaps 20 wearings total). I put them on this morning for the first time since last summer and both heels disintegrated after about an hour’s wear. There are bits of disintegrating black rubber all other the office rug. I’m wearing the sandals right now with the heels attached with duct tape until I can get home and toss them.

    I’ve been a big fan of Eccos over the years, but after the cancellation of my favorite style (Cosmo) and this wardrobe malfunction, I don’t think I’ll be buying any more.

  20. Ross - December 17, 2012 at 5:38 pm

    My husband and I have had 3 pair of Ecco shoes disintegrate! When the 3rd one disintegrated, I complained and was sent a bag to send my shoes in for review. They held them for 2 months and I finally emailed to see what happened. They said they were too old and no longer under warranty but they would send a 50% off coupon for shoes on their website. I received it yesterday and found I have only 2 weeks to use it. there were no shoes on the website available that I liked in my size. I can’t believe a company is so irresponsible!

  21. Paul Young - January 16, 2013 at 9:08 pm

    Returned dress shoes after 2.5+ years of constant wear due to cosmetic piece between sole and upper becoming loose. Sole and upper in great shape. Received a credit card for full $ amount. Great shoes, very good warranty.

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Kelli A. Alces
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ryan Calo
Claire Hill
Jay Kesten
William McGeveran
Meredith Render
Aaron Saiger
David L. Schwartz
Olivier Sylvain
Charles K. Whitehead
Aaron Zelinsky


















Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Derek Bambauer
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Khiara Bridges
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Gabriella Coleman
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
andré douglas pond cummings
Allison Danner
Laura DeNardis
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Susan Freiwald
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Vivian E. Hamilton
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Angela Harris
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Tayyab Mahmud
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Janai Nelson
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
David Opderback
David Orentlicher
Michael O'Shea
Kristen Osenga
Mary-Rose Papandrea
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
William Reynolds
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Brishen Rogers
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schleicher
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Lea Shaver
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Peter Swire
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Joseph Turow
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Elizabeth A. Wilson
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
Privacy and Security Training
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress