<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deborah Platt Majoras on Political Friendster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/deborah_platt_m.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/deborah_platt_m.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/deborah_platt_m.html/comment-page-1#comment-51204</link>
		<dc:creator>geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/12/deborah-platt-majoras-on-political-friendster.html#comment-51204</guid>
		<description>Ah, muckraking.  A time-worn tradition.  So, let me see if I get this straight.  Majoras is incapable of acting scrupulously in assessing gouging claims because she has, in the past, advised oil companies (among hundreds of other companies).  Nevermind the airtight arguments against price gouging by oil companies and the broad and vast company saying the same things as Majoras.  And this tenuous, utterly-unsupported (and oh-so-carefully implicit) claim of bias thus supports calls for Majoras to recuse herself from involvement in a wholly-unrelated case, in a different industry entirely, because, something like, &quot;she&#039;s done it before; she&#039;ll do it again!&quot;  I see.  Yes, very compelling.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, muckraking.  A time-worn tradition.  So, let me see if I get this straight.  Majoras is incapable of acting scrupulously in assessing gouging claims because she has, in the past, advised oil companies (among hundreds of other companies).  Nevermind the airtight arguments against price gouging by oil companies and the broad and vast company saying the same things as Majoras.  And this tenuous, utterly-unsupported (and oh-so-carefully implicit) claim of bias thus supports calls for Majoras to recuse herself from involvement in a wholly-unrelated case, in a different industry entirely, because, something like, &#8220;she&#8217;s done it before; she&#8217;ll do it again!&#8221;  I see.  Yes, very compelling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

