<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Ethics Puzzle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/an_ethics_puzzl.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/an_ethics_puzzl.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:47:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick S. O'Donnell</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/an_ethics_puzzl.html/comment-page-1#comment-50899</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick S. O'Donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/12/an-ethics-puzzle.html#comment-50899</guid>
		<description>I too think this is an easy one: The homeowner is at least morally obligated to notify the contractor that he/she did not receive a bill for the job that the homeowner (formally or informally) contracted for. But I&#039;m rather curious what reasons a &quot;legal ethicist,&quot; or anyone else for that matter, might proffer for not paying for the job.

Incidentally, I was involved in somewhat similar case with a plumber (someone I worked alongside with on occasion when I was in the trades) who did various small jobs at our place. We did not receive a bill for a little over a month and I called to let him know (motivated in part because I knew him?). He said the work was &quot;gratis&quot; (his word) owing to the fact that one of my brothers, a general contractor in town, had sub-contracted an awful lot of work to him and this was one way to show his appreciation.

And recently I bought a few books and an expensive calendar (reproductions of Tibetan Buddhist art) at a small religiously-oriented  bookstore and realized when I got home and looked at the receipt that we were not billed for the calendar (I usually don&#039;t look at my receipts but this one was rather large and thus easy on my eyes). I called to let them know (fear of divine retribution or bad karma?) and said I would be sending a check to pay for the calendar. Later my wife said something like, &quot;well, if that was some big department store, I don&#039;t think I would have called them, as they don&#039;t need the few extra dollars.&quot;  Our subsequent discussion hinged on the question of whether or not that was a relevant difference.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too think this is an easy one: The homeowner is at least morally obligated to notify the contractor that he/she did not receive a bill for the job that the homeowner (formally or informally) contracted for. But I&#8217;m rather curious what reasons a &#8220;legal ethicist,&#8221; or anyone else for that matter, might proffer for not paying for the job.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I was involved in somewhat similar case with a plumber (someone I worked alongside with on occasion when I was in the trades) who did various small jobs at our place. We did not receive a bill for a little over a month and I called to let him know (motivated in part because I knew him?). He said the work was &#8220;gratis&#8221; (his word) owing to the fact that one of my brothers, a general contractor in town, had sub-contracted an awful lot of work to him and this was one way to show his appreciation.</p>
<p>And recently I bought a few books and an expensive calendar (reproductions of Tibetan Buddhist art) at a small religiously-oriented  bookstore and realized when I got home and looked at the receipt that we were not billed for the calendar (I usually don&#8217;t look at my receipts but this one was rather large and thus easy on my eyes). I called to let them know (fear of divine retribution or bad karma?) and said I would be sending a check to pay for the calendar. Later my wife said something like, &#8220;well, if that was some big department store, I don&#8217;t think I would have called them, as they don&#8217;t need the few extra dollars.&#8221;  Our subsequent discussion hinged on the question of whether or not that was a relevant difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
