<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amateur Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/amateur_securit.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/amateur_securit.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Zick</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/amateur_securit.html/comment-page-1#comment-51735</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Zick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 01:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/11/amateur-security.html#comment-51735</guid>
		<description>Keeping us at &quot;Code Orange&quot; indefinitely hasn&#039;t helped.  If we are always to be mindful and afraid, then everything will naturally look suspicious. That is, unless one lives in NYC.  I find the &quot;see something, say something&quot; ads ridiculous.  There isn&#039;t a single day I don&#039;t see something strange, or out of what many would consider &quot;the ordinary.&quot;  Scaring the public works very well -- for politicians.  I have to agree it doesn&#039;t do much for security.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keeping us at &#8220;Code Orange&#8221; indefinitely hasn&#8217;t helped.  If we are always to be mindful and afraid, then everything will naturally look suspicious. That is, unless one lives in NYC.  I find the &#8220;see something, say something&#8221; ads ridiculous.  There isn&#8217;t a single day I don&#8217;t see something strange, or out of what many would consider &#8220;the ordinary.&#8221;  Scaring the public works very well &#8212; for politicians.  I have to agree it doesn&#8217;t do much for security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/amateur_securit.html/comment-page-1#comment-51734</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 23:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/11/amateur-security.html#comment-51734</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting, the extent to which the panicked public response to the risk of terrorism mirrors that of the risk of man-made global warming.  (Cass Sunstein wrote an interesting paper on the subject back in 2005, I believe.)

Given the excessive responses on subjects -- the terrrorism scares noted above, or Harry Reid&#039;s blaming the California fires on global warming, for example -- perhaps the American public will ultimately become a bit more nuanced in its approach towards risk management.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting, the extent to which the panicked public response to the risk of terrorism mirrors that of the risk of man-made global warming.  (Cass Sunstein wrote an interesting paper on the subject back in 2005, I believe.)</p>
<p>Given the excessive responses on subjects &#8212; the terrrorism scares noted above, or Harry Reid&#8217;s blaming the California fires on global warming, for example &#8212; perhaps the American public will ultimately become a bit more nuanced in its approach towards risk management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

