Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

Search


Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

jr_114_9780195367195_bnr

jr_114_9780195383768_bnr

advertise-here4


FC-CO(SS)

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments

    • Legal Fact Finder on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • Observer on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • RJ on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • RJ on Ricci and Briscoe as Disparate Impact Cases

    • Mike Rich on Negligent Corpse Mishandling

    • anon on Privacy and Tattletales

    • orly lobel on At CELS, Hoping to Blog

    • harry brooks on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • RJ on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • Michael H Schneider on Negligent Corpse Mishandling

    • flood pictures on Public opinion on same-sex marriage

    • gtownstudent on And Justache For All at GW Law

    • AF on Ricci and Briscoe as Disparate Impact Cases

    • RJ on Ricci and Briscoe as Disparate Impact Cases

    • Maryland Conservatarian on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

  •  

    Site Meter

Advising Female Graduates

posted by Sarah Waldeck

Hello to everyone and thanks to Dan for inviting me to post this month.

I wanted to begin by noting an article that appeared in today’s New York Times. In it, Lisa Belkin surveys the flood of research on how women in the workplace are viewed differently than men. Belkin’s article cites many studies, all of which will sound familiar—probably because if you haven’t heard of the study she is discussing, you’ve heard of one that had similar results. These studies all boil down to the same conclusion: women are perceived to lack whatever qualities are most valued in the workplace, at least when compared to men who are behaving the same way as their female counterparts.

As Belkin explains, women are advised:

Don’t get angry. But do take charge. Be nice. But not too nice. Speak up. But don’t seem like you talk too much.

She continues:

These are academic and professional studies, not whimsical online polls, and each time I read one I feel deflated. What are women supposed to do with this information? Transform overnight? And if so, into what? How are we supposed to be assertive, but not, at the same time?

Belkin’s article has made me consider what I say to graduating female law students. My gender-specific advice always involves the thorny issue of balancing a legal career and children. I don’t say anything about the situation that all female graduates will find themselves in: that is, being a woman in a legal workplace.

I’m wondering what advice others give on this topic, or what valuable counsel others have received. If you have anything useful, please pass it along.


 November 1, 2007 at 8:43 pm   Posted in: Feminism and Gender, Law Practice   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (2)

  1. Victoria Pynchon - November 2, 2007 at 1:53 am

    My experience with the law has been pretty darn great. I began practice in 1980 in a world populated primarily by men. It took me a little while to get my sea legs — you know — not too hard and not too soft. Then it took everyone else — secretaries, Judges, opposing counsel, clients — to adjust, but I genuinely cannot give you a post-1985 example of feeling hindered in my career because I was a woman.

    Here’s what I learned when sexism was not only rampant, but above-board between ‘80 and ‘85 — the clients who objected to being “assigned” to a “female associate” were TOTALLY BLOWN AWAY by any performance that would have earned a “B” grade. You learn to use the weight of people’s prejudices against them by just stepping out of the way and letting them fall. They learn, you don’t get a bloody nose and your career moves forward with some pretty happily astonished clients who have discovered this brilliant WOMAN.

    Listen, we women have advantages and they have advantages. If I were allowed to choose a gender in 21st century America, you can bet your bottom dollar I’d choose female.

    As Williams Carlos Williams wrote, “you can’t get the news from a poem, yet men die miserably every day for lack of what is found there.” Substitute friendship and intimacy and feeling one’s own life in all its dimensionality and you’ll get the point. There are far more men than women who “die miserably every day for lack of what is found there.”

    So, please don’t emulate men, ladies, when you enter the profession. Follow your heart, build your own book of business, network your $%#@ off, save time for family, friends and community, and your lives will be full and rewarding. It’s a great career and one that has several second, third and fourth acts.

    NOBODY can have it all but when you measure your own life experience against your male colleagues 10, 20, 30 and 40 years out, I think you’ll agree that being a woman professional, particularly a woman attorney, has been a great gig.

    Hang in there. Share with your “sisters” and be supportive of one another. You will accomplish great things.

  2. Kaimi - November 6, 2007 at 2:05 pm

    I recently had an hour-long conversation on this topic with a female friend who’s in law school (not the school I’m at), and it boiled down to, “pick your battles.”

    I told her the horror stories — things I saw and heard when I was in practice. Yes, there are wonderful, non-sexist lawyers out there, and they’re increasingly the norm. There are also lots of sexist attorneys. There are some attorneys who are general-purpose people-haters, and who employ sexist approaches to women (though they really hate everyone.) There is still a lot of low-level sexual harassment; women attorneys get hit on by partners, and have to pick whether or not to make a stink about it; there is bias against women based on the idea that women all want to become full-time baby-makers.

    I told her, it sucks. You don’t know whether the attorneys you end up working with will treat you well. You may end up on the receiving end of harassment, and then you have to decide what to do. Is it bad enough that you file a complaint? Do you just try to informally move away from the situation?

    Plus, there’s the increasing use of gender as a positive (of sorts), from the practical reality that everyone uses different means to ingratiate themselves with the powers that be. Some associates (mainly men) are plugged into the networks of golfing and yachting and so on; and some associates (mainly women) consciously choose to be a little flirty, because they think it will advance their career. Is that a choice my married friend wants to make? Being pretty can get attention for a low-level associate; can draw clients or partners; on the other hand, it tends to channel that attention in potentially harmful ways. What are the pros and cons of being the pretty attorney in the mini-skirt? Does she really want to make herself into a lipstick feminist to advance her career?

    I didn’t offer any answers to these questions; I think they’re ones to which everyone has to figure out their own answers.

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove

Website
Understanding Privacy

Kaimipono Wenger

Website
SSRN Page

Dave Hoffman

Website
SSRN Page

Nate Oman

Website
SSRN Page

Frank Pasquale

Website
SSRN Page

Deven Desai

Website
SSRN Page

Danielle Citron

Website
SSRN Page

Lawrence Cunningham

Website
SSRN Page

Sarah Waldeck

Website
SSRN Page

Jaya Ramji-Nogales

Website
SSRN Page

Solangel Maldonado

Website
SSRN Page

Gerard Magliocca

Website
SSRN Page


Guests

Rachel Godsil
Alex Kreit
Anita Krishnakumar
Matthew Sag
Michael Zimmer






Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Ann Bartow
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
David Fagundes
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
John Ip
Kevin Johnson
Dan Kahan
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
David Post
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Susan Scafidi
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Sarah Waldeck
Melissa Waters
Alfred Yen
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Frank Wu
Corey Yung
Jonathan Zittrain

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress