Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


New Supreme Court website (DJS)

A digital-age bird man for Alcatraz?  Tweeting oneself to jail. (DJS)

NYT: How privacy vanishes online (DJS)

Orin Kerr critiques the 11th Circuit on email and the Fourth Amendment (DJS)

Identification by your germs (DJS)

Interview of Professor William Stuntz (DJS)

Professor Eric Goldman on the proposed federal Anti-SLAPP Bill (DJS)

Important advice for new profs: DO NOT make jokes (online or otherwise) about killing your students. (kw)

FTC Report: ID theft is down but overall fraud is up (DJS)

Balkin on reconciliation vs. filibuster (DJS)

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments

    • Anon on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • plentyofrejections on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Anon on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Anon on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • PublishingProf on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Anon on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Howard Wasserman on Where Things Stand

    • Gerard Magliocca on Where Things Stand

    • dave hoffman on Where Things Stand

    • anon on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Keder on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Aspirant on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

    • Gerard Magliocca on Where Things Stand

    • dave hoffman on Where Things Stand

    • ParanoidProf on Spring 2010: Is the Window Open? (re-re-bumped)

  •  

    Site Meter

Welcome to the Surreal: Cisco Execs Arrested in Brazil for Tax Evasion

posted by Deven Desai

“About 650 agents executed 93 search warrants, arresting 40 people allegedly involved in the ring to avoid import, sales and corporate taxes.” And the winner of this statement is allegedly Cisco Systems.

The whole story reminds me more of the drug tales from the eighties than an IT scam. The police seized “$10 million in merchandise, a commercial jet, 18 vehicles and the equivalent of nearly $400,000 in Brazilian and U.S. currency during the raids.” I suppose if anyone wondered how much the information economy matters this story is an odd but telling example. The Brazilian government conducted a two year investigation in which they tracked sales shipments from tax haven countries. In all, about $833 million in tax revenue was lost because of the scheme. Cisco’s U.S. office is cooperating with the investigation. Still, the size of the scam is impressive. Most likely Cisco will remain silent, then conduct some sort of internal investigation, and finally issue new best practices to show its dedication to fighting corruption within the company.


 October 17, 2007 at 2:31 am   Posted in: Criminal Law   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (3)

  1. Bertil - October 17, 2007 at 5:33 am

    What?! You mean that when the American constitution tries to give away authority from the government to the private sectors, it does not immediately resolves all the wrong-doings?

    I mean: last time I checked a construction site, a farm or a dodgy Import/Export shop in the USA, they were all looking so genuinely likely to pay their tax, I almost asked them to help me with mine.

    I mean Brazil, and IT industry there, it is all a dangerous place: remember those WorldCom & Enron scandals that happened there? Oh, wait. . .

  2. John - October 17, 2007 at 9:37 am

    Here is the latest from Cisco on the situation in Brazil: http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2007/corp_101607b.html

  3. Deven - October 17, 2007 at 1:31 pm

    Bertil,

    I think there is some confusion here. I am not surprised that bad actors exist and that the systems in place may foster large scale problems. I’m impressed with the more straight forward aspect of this alleged scheme. That is why I mentioned the drug raid era. Enron and WorldCom had a corruption that was large yet in-house. Here it remains to be seen what Cisco’s direct role is. John’s press link indicates that Cisco is trying to distance the “Tier 1″ sellers in Brazil from Cisco by saying they are not part of its “direct sales operation.” That move tracks my prediction above. The next stage will be to see what monitoring systems Cisco if any had and has in place for Tier 1 sellers. Cisco may want to open up and share its policies regarding its resellers with the public. My guess is that in-house counsel will resist that idea. Still, if it will come out as part of cooperating with the investigation, Cisco may have a moment here to build trust. Although one wonders whether the market really cares about these events (Cisco is trading near its 52-week high and indeed, some may like the idea of a sales structure that allows others to be shall one say aggressive but not connected to the company such that liability reaches it), sharing exactly what the Tier 1 system is and how it functions may help Cisco with other law enforcement issues and those who do care about such behaviors.

    In any event what seemed interesting to me is that IT is apparently as lucrative as other goods for smuggling. Given its high cost of course one might smuggle it. But the facts sound like more like a tale of gold, drugs, or other contraband rather than the image of some tech guys saying “Hey buddy. I can score you a deal for a steady flow of IT.” “Really?” “Yeah, hundreds of millions over the next five years. We can jets, cars, women, you name it.” “Cool.”

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Nate Oman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Robert Ahdieh
Lisa Fairfax
Michelle Harner
Sherrilyn Ifill
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Tuan Samahon
Alfred Yen










Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Ann Bartow
Adam Benforado
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
David Fagundes
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
John Ip
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
David Post
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Susan Scafidi
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress