<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Regulating Private Military Companies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/10/regulating_priv.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/10/regulating_priv.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:31:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: scared</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/10/regulating_priv.html/comment-page-1#comment-52038</link>
		<dc:creator>scared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 06:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/10/regulating-private-military-companies.html#comment-52038</guid>
		<description>I look forward to reading your piece.  I have been skimming the special issue of the ICRC Review on this issue; one article is available here:

http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/review-863-p573

Also, this may be of interest:

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/11/halliburton200711?printable=true&amp;currentPage=all

&quot;Qui tam cases from Iraq are investigated by an F.B.I. unit in Rock Island, Illinois. According to Grayson, the unit has a &quot;standing order&quot; to get approval from the attorneys at Vinson &amp; Elkins before questioning anyone at Halliburton or KBR. &quot;F.B.I. agents are not supposed to politely ask permission,&quot; he says. &quot;The most common interview technique by the F.B.I. is a knock on your door at nine o&#039;clock at night. They&#039;re not allowed to do that when it comes to Halliburton and KBR employees.&quot; (In its e-mailed statement, the D.O.J. said it cannot comment on how any Iraq case has been investigated; Vinson &amp; Elkins did not respond to a request for comment.)&quot;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look forward to reading your piece.  I have been skimming the special issue of the ICRC Review on this issue; one article is available here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/review-863-p573" rel="nofollow">http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/review-863-p573</a></p>
<p>Also, this may be of interest:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/11/halliburton200711?printable=true&#038;currentPage=all" rel="nofollow">http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/11/halliburton200711?printable=true&#038;currentPage=all</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Qui tam cases from Iraq are investigated by an F.B.I. unit in Rock Island, Illinois. According to Grayson, the unit has a &#8220;standing order&#8221; to get approval from the attorneys at Vinson &#038; Elkins before questioning anyone at Halliburton or KBR. &#8220;F.B.I. agents are not supposed to politely ask permission,&#8221; he says. &#8220;The most common interview technique by the F.B.I. is a knock on your door at nine o&#8217;clock at night. They&#8217;re not allowed to do that when it comes to Halliburton and KBR employees.&#8221; (In its e-mailed statement, the D.O.J. said it cannot comment on how any Iraq case has been investigated; Vinson &#038; Elkins did not respond to a request for comment.)&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
