<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are there fewer women at your law school?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/10/are_there_fewer.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/10/are_there_fewer.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Steele</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/10/are_there_fewer.html/comment-page-1#comment-52190</link>
		<dc:creator>John Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 05:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/10/are-there-fewer-women-at-your-law-school.html#comment-52190</guid>
		<description>To follow up on an idea I floated at Tax Law Prof Blog&#039;s series on advice for Dean Erwin Chemerinsky of UC-Irvine, if law schools added an LL.B program for undergraduates, then, among many other benefits, lawyers who wanted to start families in their early thirties would be able to get a law degree with little debt, sink a full decade or more into becoming a practicing laywer, and then balance a family with part-time lawyering or leave the profession for a while, knowing that their twelve years of experience would permit them to jump back in later.  Those benefits wouldn&#039;t accrue only to women, but to all lawyers who wanted to balance lawyering and family life.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To follow up on an idea I floated at Tax Law Prof Blog&#8217;s series on advice for Dean Erwin Chemerinsky of UC-Irvine, if law schools added an LL.B program for undergraduates, then, among many other benefits, lawyers who wanted to start families in their early thirties would be able to get a law degree with little debt, sink a full decade or more into becoming a practicing laywer, and then balance a family with part-time lawyering or leave the profession for a while, knowing that their twelve years of experience would permit them to jump back in later.  Those benefits wouldn&#8217;t accrue only to women, but to all lawyers who wanted to balance lawyering and family life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/10/are_there_fewer.html/comment-page-1#comment-52189</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/10/are-there-fewer-women-at-your-law-school.html#comment-52189</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about the profession yet, being a 2L this year, but I sure do know that law school itself is not particularly family-friendly. The school could draw more women if it offered childcare, packed the schedule with classes in the morning, and gave me fewer blank stares when I have to mention that I have a kid at home.

I&#039;m a lucky one, though; I get along OK with my ex and mostly do not have custody conflicts. But I have to imagine that the lack of daycare is a super barrier to women who have kids and also have the abilities to attend a top law school.

A note about career counseling comes to mind. I keep hearing about the great jobs that&#039;ll be lined up for me when I finish school, but I can&#039;t work 70 hours a week as a new associate gunning for partnership. Schools&#039; career counseling offices should focus not just on the high-powered associate positions, but also on decently remunerative work that&#039;s more able to be squared with family responsibilities.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about the profession yet, being a 2L this year, but I sure do know that law school itself is not particularly family-friendly. The school could draw more women if it offered childcare, packed the schedule with classes in the morning, and gave me fewer blank stares when I have to mention that I have a kid at home.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a lucky one, though; I get along OK with my ex and mostly do not have custody conflicts. But I have to imagine that the lack of daycare is a super barrier to women who have kids and also have the abilities to attend a top law school.</p>
<p>A note about career counseling comes to mind. I keep hearing about the great jobs that&#8217;ll be lined up for me when I finish school, but I can&#8217;t work 70 hours a week as a new associate gunning for partnership. Schools&#8217; career counseling offices should focus not just on the high-powered associate positions, but also on decently remunerative work that&#8217;s more able to be squared with family responsibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/10/are_there_fewer.html/comment-page-1#comment-52188</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/10/are-there-fewer-women-at-your-law-school.html#comment-52188</guid>
		<description>I am not sure about the overall student population, but I have noticed that, for instance, we have fewer women each year on the Law Review, a commitment which probably has the same sort of negative connotations as a high-powered firm career--demanding, time-consuming, not conducive to family life (for those female students who have families) and, perhaps, just not worth it (at least at higher-ranked schools where getting a job is less of a concern).

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure about the overall student population, but I have noticed that, for instance, we have fewer women each year on the Law Review, a commitment which probably has the same sort of negative connotations as a high-powered firm career&#8211;demanding, time-consuming, not conducive to family life (for those female students who have families) and, perhaps, just not worth it (at least at higher-ranked schools where getting a job is less of a concern).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

