Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 


advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Denial of tenure case at Georgetown raises thorny issues .  LAC

NYT editorial quotes Dan Solove likening NSA snooping to Seurat art: one small dot seems trivial, but together a portrait emerges. Here. (LAC)

Warren Buffett never negotiates on price, always makes his highest offer first.  LAC

An elite decline? (kw)

Unanswered Questions (kw)

Most under-appreciated thing about Warren Buffett: he built Berkshire to last well beyond him.  (LAC, at BRK annual meeting via Motley Fool, here.)

University governance as a new topic of public discussion.

An unusual profile of Mary Anne Franks (kw)

Aggressive copyright litigation run amok. (fp)

USA Today's Matt Krantz quoting me on Warren Buffett joining Twitter.  (LAC)


Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Aaron Zelinsky on Grading Lessons from Cognitive Psychology

    • Brett Bellmore on Google Challenges Gag Orders Relating to Surveillance Programs, Citing First Amendment

    • Steph Tai on Grading Lessons from Cognitive Psychology

    • Aaron Zelinsky on Grading Lessons from Cognitive Psychology

    • Steph Tai on Grading Lessons from Cognitive Psychology

    • Aaron Zelinsky on Grading Lessons from Cognitive Psychology

    • Steph Tai on Grading Lessons from Cognitive Psychology

    • Charlie Naegle on Google Challenges Gag Orders Relating to Surveillance Programs, Citing First Amendment

    • Michael Dorff on Questioning Performance Pay

    • Sandra Sperino on Sole Motives and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar

    • Michal Zapendowski on What Should a Judge's Reversal Rate Be?

    • Orin Kerr on Grading Lessons from Cognitive Psychology

    • AP on Unintended Consequences of Scholarship

    • Howard Wasserman on Grading Lessons from Cognitive Psychology

    • Lawrence Cunningham on Unintended Consequences of Scholarship
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

A Candidate’s Perspective on the Meat Market

posted by Dave Hoffman

Meat_section_of_the_market_in_Oaxaca.jpgA candidate for a job at the AALS hiring conference (a.k.a. “the meat market”) has written me the following reflection on the process this year. For the time being s/he wants to remain anonymous. I thought it worth sharing with you. I haven’t edited it at all, except for inserting the appropriate hyperlinks, and adding the relevant picture.

Many people give advice about what you need to do to prepare for the AALS Faculty Recruitment Conference. But most of those folks are already established professors. I just returned from the conference and I want to provide some general thoughts about what made my time at the conference happier and more productive for me. I know it is too late for this crop of young candidates, but maybe it will help on your callbacks or future generations of aspiring professors.

  • Think of it as the “meet” market, not the “meat” market. The interviews are an opportunity to meet a bunch of folks who might one day be your colleagues, collaborators, and friends, whether you end up at their school or not. Likewise, this is an opportunity to meet your cohort of young profs. Take advantage of that time and remember that life is long and you may run into these folks again at future conferences once you are on the other side of the hiring process.
  • Fight your baser fears and push yourself to be social. I – like many who are hoping to enter (or are already in) the academy – am not particularly comfortable at cocktail parties. Fight through your discomfort. Especially if you don’t know anyone at the conference, go to the Friday night party. Sidle up to some candidate you’ve never met and introduce yourself. As mentioned above, these folks might be your peers next year, but more immediately you will run into some of these people throughout the weekend. You will be more comfortable, happier, and perform better in interviews if you see a friendly face and can commiserate about the process with someone else. Go to the cocktail party on Saturday night (unless you have plans with a school for dinner or drinks). Force yourself to talk to both candidates and recruiters. Of course it is natural to scan the room for folks that might directly help you. If you see them, force yourself to go talk to them. Even if it doesn’t help this year, it might help in the future.
  • Practice random acts of kindness. The pressure during the conference can be staggering. The furtive glances at nametags, the awkward waits in long hallways outside doors, the shameful self evaluating and unseemly comparisons, and the desperate message checking all contribute to a diminished sense of well being during the weekend. You’ll be surprised how much better you will feel if you say a kind word to a stranger or hold open an elevator door even if you are in a hurry. I tried to say at least one nice thing to a stranger in every elevator ride up to an interview. I immediately felt better about the process and myself.
  • Think positive thoughts before each interview. Before each interview I tried to find a small quiet place to myself to reflect on the upcoming interview, usually a stairwell near the interview room. While there, I tried to imagine my best-possible-self participating in the interview. My mantra: you deserve to be there; you are as smart, charming, and witty; you have something to say that they want to hear; you can sell sand in the Sahara; you are confident, but not arrogant. It may seem hokey but it brings up your level of confidence and performance.
  • Bring energy and humor into the interview process. The other side of the table may be less stressful, but it is no less tiring. Be empathetic toward your inquisitors and help them out. Try to keep them entertained. Show some energy and passion for your projects and for teaching. They want to know what you will be like in the classroom (even if they only want you to publish). If you can’t be passionate about your own work, can you bring passion to teaching the cannon? Don’t be afraid to be funny. You can lighten the mood.
  • Follow the other advice given already. Show up prepared and with a gameplan. Have a macro and micro strategy. Your macro strategy is about you. Know your research backward and forward. Anticipate the questions about your research and think through answers. Be able to speak in 1 – 3 minute sound bites about your paper and your research agenda. On that note, make sure you have a research agenda to offer. Your micro strategy involves each particular school. Be able to answer basic questions like: Why “x” location? Why “y” school? What do you want to teach? Why academia? These answers might change depending on the school with which you are interviewing. Think about the school’s hiring needs, its philosophy toward teaching, and any connection you might have to the area. Don’t be afraid to be a little shameless in modifying your answers for each school. If it helps, think of it as alternative pleading. “I would really like to end up in Southern California because we have family there, alternatively we would really like to end up in Chicago because we love urban living and there are lots of opportunities for my partner’s career there.”
  • Don’t be intimidated by other folks that are there. There may be someone prettier than you at the ball, but don’t let that phase you. You only need to find that one special someone to take you home at the end of the night.

(Image Source: Wikicommons)


 October 28, 2007 at 4:45 pm   Posted in: Law School (Hiring & Laterals)   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (4)

  1. Deven - October 28, 2007 at 5:17 pm

    Whoever this person is, I hope all goes well for you. Some may think all of the offered tips are easier said than done, but the ideas seem pretty accurate to me. In simpler terms, try to keep your perspective about the oddity of the process and most importantly who you are.

  2. Jason - October 28, 2007 at 8:15 pm

    I couldn’t agree more with these reflections on the experience. I just returned from DC as a candidate and had a much better time this year than last year b/c I did many of the things this candidate suggested. Regardless of a callback, I met colleagues and other candidates that I look forward to working with in the near future.

  3. Nicolas Jondet - October 29, 2007 at 12:17 am

    As a Frenchman coming to the FRC with no scheduled interview, my chances to get a job in the US were rather slim. With the conference now over, I can safely say that I will not get at job at a US institution this year.

    However, as I was not expecting much coming in, I rather enjoyed the experience there. I met a lot of people, especially during the receptions. Actually, mingling at the Thursday reception allowed me to get my only interview of the conference.

    I also met other people like me, whose job prospects were hindered by a lack of American JD and/or publication in an American law review. Among this “Lost in translation fellowship” were three Frenchmen, two Germans and two Americans with UK postgraduate experience. (I am quite curious to see whether the good people at marketforlawprofessors.com will come up with interesting data about the extent and fate of this fellowship).

    However, although I sometimes felt out of place, I, unlike Bill Murray’s character in “Lost in translation”, never felt alienated. This was thanks to everybody’s genuine willingness to engage in light banter, give encouragements and advice (which can be summed up to: ‘Publication, Publication, Publication’)

    I hope to stay in touch with the people I met, and will use this experience if I decide to have another go next year. In the meantime, I still have a few more days to enjoy the capital city before going back to Edinburgh.

  4. anon - October 29, 2007 at 2:24 pm

    As a candidate who just went through the process, I agree with most of the comments, but a couple points of dissent:

    1. Don’t go to the cocktail party. If you did well at the interview, the cocktail party is an occasion to mess things up (e.g. forgeting the name of your interviewer or getting their school wrong). If you did badly at the interview, the cocktail party will not save you.

    2. Don’t commiserate, and, if you must, do the commiserating far outside the hotel.

    Commiseration feeds negative energy through an already stressful process. And the hotel is a very small place. I started telling another friend about the terrible interview I had with a top-20 school. I noticed, too late, that one of my interviewers walked right by. Suffice to say that I do not think it helped my chances.

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Kelli A. Alces
Andrew Blair-Stanek
Ryan Calo
Katie Eyer
Stephen Galoob
Woodrow Hartzog
Claire Hill
William McGeveran
David L. Schwartz
Babak Siavoshy
Charles K. Whitehead
Aaron Zelinsky


















Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Derek Bambauer
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Khiara Bridges
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Gabriella Coleman
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
andré douglas pond cummings
Allison Danner
Laura DeNardis
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Susan Freiwald
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Vivian E. Hamilton
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Angela Harris
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Jay Kesten
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Tayyab Mahmud
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Janai Nelson
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
David Opderback
David Orentlicher
Michael O'Shea
Kristen Osenga
Mary-Rose Papandrea
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Meredith Render
William Reynolds
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Brishen Rogers
Sasha Romanosky
Aaron Saiger
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schleicher
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Lea Shaver
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Peter Swire
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Joseph Turow
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Elizabeth A. Wilson
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
Privacy and Security Training
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress