<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Turkish Style</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/the_countermajo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/the_countermajo.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:22:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/the_countermajo.html/comment-page-1#comment-52633</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/the-countermajoritarian-difficulty-turkish-style.html#comment-52633</guid>
		<description>&quot;Neither are actually trained as philosopher kings, although arguably law provides better training for high-politics than does, say, the study of logistics.&quot;

I think you aren&#039;t giving military education and training its proper due.  While all military under training in their specialty, a large percentage of military training focuses on leadership and what it takes to lead his/her troops in whatever endeavor they are undertaking.  One could argue that this leadership training (and practice in times of war or peace) equips one to perform the &quot;philosopher king&quot; role at least as well as someone who has spent their time academically studying constitutional law.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Neither are actually trained as philosopher kings, although arguably law provides better training for high-politics than does, say, the study of logistics.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you aren&#8217;t giving military education and training its proper due.  While all military under training in their specialty, a large percentage of military training focuses on leadership and what it takes to lead his/her troops in whatever endeavor they are undertaking.  One could argue that this leadership training (and practice in times of war or peace) equips one to perform the &#8220;philosopher king&#8221; role at least as well as someone who has spent their time academically studying constitutional law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/the_countermajo.html/comment-page-1#comment-52632</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 07:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/the-countermajoritarian-difficulty-turkish-style.html#comment-52632</guid>
		<description>You know, I think the Turks got the better deal.

The Turkish Army occasionally steps in.  The US Supreme Court meddles on a regular basis.

The Turkish Army is bound by principles.

The US Supreme Court is bound only by what the members think they can get away with.

For example,  I don&#039;t think you&#039;d ever see the Turkish Military striking down Term Limits on politicians.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I think the Turks got the better deal.</p>
<p>The Turkish Army occasionally steps in.  The US Supreme Court meddles on a regular basis.</p>
<p>The Turkish Army is bound by principles.</p>
<p>The US Supreme Court is bound only by what the members think they can get away with.</p>
<p>For example,  I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;d ever see the Turkish Military striking down Term Limits on politicians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/the_countermajo.html/comment-page-1#comment-52631</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/the-countermajoritarian-difficulty-turkish-style.html#comment-52631</guid>
		<description>Good post!  In the US, the Supreme&#039;s countermajoritarian power is checked by voters ability to amend the constitution.  Amendments correctly require a super majority over a long period of time.  I don&#039;t know if a supermajority of Turks can amend their secular consitution to allow a people&#039;s Islamic Republic, but if they do, they deserve what they will get ;)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post!  In the US, the Supreme&#8217;s countermajoritarian power is checked by voters ability to amend the constitution.  Amendments correctly require a super majority over a long period of time.  I don&#8217;t know if a supermajority of Turks can amend their secular consitution to allow a people&#8217;s Islamic Republic, but if they do, they deserve what they will get <img src='http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Schraub</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/the_countermajo.html/comment-page-1#comment-52630</link>
		<dc:creator>David Schraub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/the-countermajoritarian-difficulty-turkish-style.html#comment-52630</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s also the point that--because they don&#039;t have military power--successful countermajoritarian action by the courts &lt;a href=&quot;http://dsadevil.blogspot.com/2007/08/turkish-supreme-court.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;indicates that the population has internalized constitutional norms&lt;/a&gt; about the rule of law.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s also the point that&#8211;because they don&#8217;t have military power&#8211;successful countermajoritarian action by the courts <a href="http://dsadevil.blogspot.com/2007/08/turkish-supreme-court.html" rel="nofollow">indicates that the population has internalized constitutional norms</a> about the rule of law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick S. O'Donnell</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/the_countermajo.html/comment-page-1#comment-52629</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick S. O'Donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/the-countermajoritarian-difficulty-turkish-style.html#comment-52629</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not at all troubled by the Supreme Court as a countermajoritarian institution myself, as the &quot;will of the people&quot; is sometimes dangerous and wrongheaded because irrational, too passionate, etc. But this is not an argument I want to pursue here as it is far too complex and time-consuming.

Rather, I simply want to thank you for a level-headed and fair assessment of the situtation in Turkey today. If any CO readers are new to the religion and politics of Turkey and want to begin a systematic exploration of the subject, they could do worse than consult the following:

Ahmad, Feroz. Turkey: The Quest for Identity. Oxford, UK: Oneworld, 2003.

Barkey, Henri J. and Graham E. Fuller. Turkey’s Kurdish Question. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998.

Berkes, Niyazi. Development of Secularism in Turkey. Montreal: McGill University Press, 1964.

Bozdogan, Sibel and Resat Kasaba, eds. Rethinking Modernity and National Identity in Turkey. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1997.

Gunter, Michael M. The Kurds and the Future of Turkey. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1997.

Hillebrand, Carole, ed. The Sultan’s Turret: Studies in Persian and Turkish Culture. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1999.

Houston, Christopher. Islam, Kurds and the Turkish Nation State. Oxford, UK: Berg, 2001.

Howe, Marvine. Turkey Today: A Nation Divided Over Islam’s Revival. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2000.

Kayali, Hasan. A History of Modern Turkey. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Kinzer, Stephen. Crescent and Star: Turkey Between Two Worlds. New York: Farrar, Straus &amp; Giroux, 2002.

Kirişci, Kemal and Gareth M. Winrow. The Kurdish Question and Turkey: An Example of a Trans-state Ethnic Conflict. London: Frank Cass, 1997.

Kucuk, Hulya. The Role of the Bektashis in Turkey’s National Struggle. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 2002.

Lewis, Bernard. The Emergence of Modern Turkey. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 3rd ed., 2001.

Liel, Alon (Emanuel Lottem, trans.). Turkey in the Middle East: Oil, Islam, and Politics. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publ., 2001.

Malik, Hafeez, ed. Russian-American Relations: Islamic and Turkish Dimensions in the Volga-Ural Basin. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000.

Mardin, Şerif. The Genesis of Young Ottoman Thought: A Study in the Modernization of Turkish Political Ideas. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2000.

Mardin, Serif. Religion, Society and Modernity in Turkey. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2002.

Olson, Robert W. The Kurdish Question and Turkish-Iranian Relations: From World War I to 1998. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publ., 1998.

Olson, Robert W. Turkey’s Relations with Iran, Syria, Israel, and Russia, 1991-2000: The Kurdish And Islamist Questions.  Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publ., 2001.

Özbudun, Ergun. Contemporary Turkish Politics: Challenges to Democratic Consolidation. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2000.

Özdemir, Adil and Kenneth Frank. Visible Islam in Modern Turkey. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000.

Pope, Hugh and Nicole Pope. Turkey Unveiled: A History of Modern Turkey. Woodstock, NY: Overlook Press, 2000.

Rubin, Barry and Kemal Kirişci, eds. Turkey in World Politics: An Emerging Multiregional Power. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2001.

Shankland, David. The Alevis in Turkey: The Emergence of a Secular Islamic Tradition. London: Curzon, 2003.

Tapper, Richard, ed. Islam in Modern Turkey: Religion, Politics, and Literature in a Secular State. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1994.

Toprak, Binnaz. Islam and Political Development in Turkey. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1981.

White, Jenny B. Islamist Mobilization in Turkey: A Study in Vernacular Politics. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 2003.

Yavuz, M. Hakan. Islamic Political Identity in Turkey. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2003.

Zürcher, Erik. Turkey: A Modern History. London: I.B. Tauris, 1997.

If anyone is interested in more historically oriented titles I can send along a short list upon request.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not at all troubled by the Supreme Court as a countermajoritarian institution myself, as the &#8220;will of the people&#8221; is sometimes dangerous and wrongheaded because irrational, too passionate, etc. But this is not an argument I want to pursue here as it is far too complex and time-consuming.</p>
<p>Rather, I simply want to thank you for a level-headed and fair assessment of the situtation in Turkey today. If any CO readers are new to the religion and politics of Turkey and want to begin a systematic exploration of the subject, they could do worse than consult the following:</p>
<p>Ahmad, Feroz. Turkey: The Quest for Identity. Oxford, UK: Oneworld, 2003.</p>
<p>Barkey, Henri J. and Graham E. Fuller. Turkey’s Kurdish Question. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998.</p>
<p>Berkes, Niyazi. Development of Secularism in Turkey. Montreal: McGill University Press, 1964.</p>
<p>Bozdogan, Sibel and Resat Kasaba, eds. Rethinking Modernity and National Identity in Turkey. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1997.</p>
<p>Gunter, Michael M. The Kurds and the Future of Turkey. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1997.</p>
<p>Hillebrand, Carole, ed. The Sultan’s Turret: Studies in Persian and Turkish Culture. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1999.</p>
<p>Houston, Christopher. Islam, Kurds and the Turkish Nation State. Oxford, UK: Berg, 2001.</p>
<p>Howe, Marvine. Turkey Today: A Nation Divided Over Islam’s Revival. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2000.</p>
<p>Kayali, Hasan. A History of Modern Turkey. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.</p>
<p>Kinzer, Stephen. Crescent and Star: Turkey Between Two Worlds. New York: Farrar, Straus &#038; Giroux, 2002.</p>
<p>Kirişci, Kemal and Gareth M. Winrow. The Kurdish Question and Turkey: An Example of a Trans-state Ethnic Conflict. London: Frank Cass, 1997.</p>
<p>Kucuk, Hulya. The Role of the Bektashis in Turkey’s National Struggle. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 2002.</p>
<p>Lewis, Bernard. The Emergence of Modern Turkey. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 3rd ed., 2001.</p>
<p>Liel, Alon (Emanuel Lottem, trans.). Turkey in the Middle East: Oil, Islam, and Politics. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publ., 2001.</p>
<p>Malik, Hafeez, ed. Russian-American Relations: Islamic and Turkish Dimensions in the Volga-Ural Basin. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000.</p>
<p>Mardin, Şerif. The Genesis of Young Ottoman Thought: A Study in the Modernization of Turkish Political Ideas. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2000.</p>
<p>Mardin, Serif. Religion, Society and Modernity in Turkey. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2002.</p>
<p>Olson, Robert W. The Kurdish Question and Turkish-Iranian Relations: From World War I to 1998. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publ., 1998.</p>
<p>Olson, Robert W. Turkey’s Relations with Iran, Syria, Israel, and Russia, 1991-2000: The Kurdish And Islamist Questions.  Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publ., 2001.</p>
<p>Özbudun, Ergun. Contemporary Turkish Politics: Challenges to Democratic Consolidation. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2000.</p>
<p>Özdemir, Adil and Kenneth Frank. Visible Islam in Modern Turkey. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000.</p>
<p>Pope, Hugh and Nicole Pope. Turkey Unveiled: A History of Modern Turkey. Woodstock, NY: Overlook Press, 2000.</p>
<p>Rubin, Barry and Kemal Kirişci, eds. Turkey in World Politics: An Emerging Multiregional Power. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2001.</p>
<p>Shankland, David. The Alevis in Turkey: The Emergence of a Secular Islamic Tradition. London: Curzon, 2003.</p>
<p>Tapper, Richard, ed. Islam in Modern Turkey: Religion, Politics, and Literature in a Secular State. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1994.</p>
<p>Toprak, Binnaz. Islam and Political Development in Turkey. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1981.</p>
<p>White, Jenny B. Islamist Mobilization in Turkey: A Study in Vernacular Politics. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 2003.</p>
<p>Yavuz, M. Hakan. Islamic Political Identity in Turkey. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2003.</p>
<p>Zürcher, Erik. Turkey: A Modern History. London: I.B. Tauris, 1997.</p>
<p>If anyone is interested in more historically oriented titles I can send along a short list upon request.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
