<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Form of, &#8220;Did I Say That?&#8221;: Cheney on Occupying Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/form_of_did_i_s.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/form_of_did_i_s.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:27:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AYY</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/form_of_did_i_s.html/comment-page-1#comment-52818</link>
		<dc:creator>AYY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/form-of-did-i-say-that-cheney-on-occupying-iraq.html#comment-52818</guid>
		<description>There are so many equivocations and hedgings in this post that I&#039;m not quite sure what you&#039;re saying.

Just because all problems haven&#039;t been solved doesn&#039;t mean they weren&#039;t planned for reasonably well. (You seem to have left out the fact that the Dems haven&#039;t been all that keen on funding our troops properly.) And besides, we didn&#039;t go into Iraq alone, so I don&#039;t follow why you think that was a problem.

At the time of the first Gulf War Saddam&#039;s nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons programs were at a different stage than they were in 2003.  Also at that time we thought France and Russia might cooperate to the point that sanctions would work. Also Saddam&#039;s relationship with Al Qaeda was apparently quite different.

So if Cheney changed positions, there might have been a good reason for it. Risks that might not have been worth taking in the early 90&#039;s could have been worth taking in 2003.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many equivocations and hedgings in this post that I&#8217;m not quite sure what you&#8217;re saying.</p>
<p>Just because all problems haven&#8217;t been solved doesn&#8217;t mean they weren&#8217;t planned for reasonably well. (You seem to have left out the fact that the Dems haven&#8217;t been all that keen on funding our troops properly.) And besides, we didn&#8217;t go into Iraq alone, so I don&#8217;t follow why you think that was a problem.</p>
<p>At the time of the first Gulf War Saddam&#8217;s nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons programs were at a different stage than they were in 2003.  Also at that time we thought France and Russia might cooperate to the point that sanctions would work. Also Saddam&#8217;s relationship with Al Qaeda was apparently quite different.</p>
<p>So if Cheney changed positions, there might have been a good reason for it. Risks that might not have been worth taking in the early 90&#8217;s could have been worth taking in 2003.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Levine</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/form_of_did_i_s.html/comment-page-1#comment-52817</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/form-of-did-i-say-that-cheney-on-occupying-iraq.html#comment-52817</guid>
		<description>Was Cheney ignored or did he change position?  The plot thickens . . . thanks for the post.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was Cheney ignored or did he change position?  The plot thickens . . . thanks for the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
