<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Slow Day at the Office: Lawyers Editing on Wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/a_slow_day_at_t.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/a_slow_day_at_t.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:19:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Interested</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/a_slow_day_at_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-52769</link>
		<dc:creator>Interested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/a-slow-day-at-the-office-lawyers-editing-on-wikipedia.html#comment-52769</guid>
		<description>Not so interesting and there is really no &quot;there&quot; there.  Those firms that have made small and insignificant edits to their own description are really showing the truth -- they have a marketing staff assigned the job of making sure that internet information about their firm is up-to-date and accurate.  Most lawyers (beyond the younger ones) probably don&#039;t even know what a wiki is yet, so I doubt that they are spending time editing firm info on Wikipedia on top of 2,400 billable hours.  (BTW:  You ever try to bill 2,400 hours, on top of the other activities that firms require these days -- recruiting, professional reading and writing, administrative work, etc.?)

Keep up the sluething!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so interesting and there is really no &#8220;there&#8221; there.  Those firms that have made small and insignificant edits to their own description are really showing the truth &#8212; they have a marketing staff assigned the job of making sure that internet information about their firm is up-to-date and accurate.  Most lawyers (beyond the younger ones) probably don&#8217;t even know what a wiki is yet, so I doubt that they are spending time editing firm info on Wikipedia on top of 2,400 billable hours.  (BTW:  You ever try to bill 2,400 hours, on top of the other activities that firms require these days &#8212; recruiting, professional reading and writing, administrative work, etc.?)</p>
<p>Keep up the sluething!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: law student</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/a_slow_day_at_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-52768</link>
		<dc:creator>law student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/a-slow-day-at-the-office-lawyers-editing-on-wikipedia.html#comment-52768</guid>
		<description>My favorite description from one of the firm editors of his change...

&quot;Deleted inexplicable and factually incorrect claim that Prada could possibly be viewed as an economical alternative to Armani.&quot;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite description from one of the firm editors of his change&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Deleted inexplicable and factually incorrect claim that Prada could possibly be viewed as an economical alternative to Armani.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/a_slow_day_at_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-52767</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/a-slow-day-at-the-office-lawyers-editing-on-wikipedia.html#comment-52767</guid>
		<description>How do they find the time to make all these edits and still bill 2400 hours a year?  This is proof that the best and brightest go to these firms.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do they find the time to make all these edits and still bill 2400 hours a year?  This is proof that the best and brightest go to these firms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ion</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/a_slow_day_at_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-52766</link>
		<dc:creator>Ion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 07:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/a-slow-day-at-the-office-lawyers-editing-on-wikipedia.html#comment-52766</guid>
		<description>FWIW: WilmerHale edited under the handle &quot;WilmerHale&quot; until they got smart and made up another pseudonym.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW: WilmerHale edited under the handle &#8220;WilmerHale&#8221; until they got smart and made up another pseudonym.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom T.</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/a_slow_day_at_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-52765</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 06:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/a-slow-day-at-the-office-lawyers-editing-on-wikipedia.html#comment-52765</guid>
		<description>There are a vast number of edits to movie star pages apparently originating from within the DOJ.  The only substantive edit I could find from there was Lynne Stewart&#039;s page.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a vast number of edits to movie star pages apparently originating from within the DOJ.  The only substantive edit I could find from there was Lynne Stewart&#8217;s page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/a_slow_day_at_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-52764</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/a-slow-day-at-the-office-lawyers-editing-on-wikipedia.html#comment-52764</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve first-hand witnessed a plaintiffs&#039; law firm post celebratory stuff about its cases, and I&#039;ve seen an account corresponding to a biglaw firm partner&#039;s name delete information about one of his clients.  As Wikipedia biases go, the first is still up on the pages, and the second was quickly corrected.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve first-hand witnessed a plaintiffs&#8217; law firm post celebratory stuff about its cases, and I&#8217;ve seen an account corresponding to a biglaw firm partner&#8217;s name delete information about one of his clients.  As Wikipedia biases go, the first is still up on the pages, and the second was quickly corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/a_slow_day_at_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-52763</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/a-slow-day-at-the-office-lawyers-editing-on-wikipedia.html#comment-52763</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised no one has suggested turning this activity on law schools.  Unfortunately, most law schools seem to operate via university IP addresses, so it&#039;s hard to segregate out, for example, the law school edits from the university edits.

There are, of course, some free-standing law schools without their own IP addresses.

And, interestingly, the University of Michigan law school seems to have its own IP addresses.  Someone from U of M law felt inspired to edit the entry on Chemerinsky by recharacterizing him as &quot;one of the most famous and respected&quot; con law professors, rather than &quot;the most famous and respected&quot; con law professor. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&amp;oldid=73898386.  I certainly hope that wasn&#039;t a faculty member!  ;)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised no one has suggested turning this activity on law schools.  Unfortunately, most law schools seem to operate via university IP addresses, so it&#8217;s hard to segregate out, for example, the law school edits from the university edits.</p>
<p>There are, of course, some free-standing law schools without their own IP addresses.</p>
<p>And, interestingly, the University of Michigan law school seems to have its own IP addresses.  Someone from U of M law felt inspired to edit the entry on Chemerinsky by recharacterizing him as &#8220;one of the most famous and respected&#8221; con law professors, rather than &#8220;the most famous and respected&#8221; con law professor. See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&#038;oldid=73898386" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&#038;oldid=73898386</a>.  I certainly hope that wasn&#8217;t a faculty member!  <img src='http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave hoffman</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/a_slow_day_at_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-52762</link>
		<dc:creator>dave hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/a-slow-day-at-the-office-lawyers-editing-on-wikipedia.html#comment-52762</guid>
		<description>Ted, you are of course right that the most likely scenario is junior associates or paralegals.  And overall, these edits are generally trivial and not particularly harmful.  That&#039;s why I asked if anyone see&#039;s anything more problematic (client edits) out there....

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted, you are of course right that the most likely scenario is junior associates or paralegals.  And overall, these edits are generally trivial and not particularly harmful.  That&#8217;s why I asked if anyone see&#8217;s anything more problematic (client edits) out there&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/a_slow_day_at_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-52761</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/a-slow-day-at-the-office-lawyers-editing-on-wikipedia.html#comment-52761</guid>
		<description>For example, such an explanation would better explain why a &quot;law firm&quot; is editing information about Coach Lugash in a Simpsons wikipedia page or editing the Jewish population of Tiraspol.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For example, such an explanation would better explain why a &#8220;law firm&#8221; is editing information about Coach Lugash in a Simpsons wikipedia page or editing the Jewish population of Tiraspol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/a_slow_day_at_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-52760</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/a-slow-day-at-the-office-lawyers-editing-on-wikipedia.html#comment-52760</guid>
		<description>Given that most lawfirms have hundreds of employees who might have a slow day, the more likely scenario is that a bored associate (or paralegal or secretary, even) edited a page without the approval of the powers that be, rather than a sinister machination by the firm&#039;s executive committee.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that most lawfirms have hundreds of employees who might have a slow day, the more likely scenario is that a bored associate (or paralegal or secretary, even) edited a page without the approval of the powers that be, rather than a sinister machination by the firm&#8217;s executive committee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Boyden</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/a_slow_day_at_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-52759</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Boyden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/a-slow-day-at-the-office-lawyers-editing-on-wikipedia.html#comment-52759</guid>
		<description>By itself, this is not terribly surprising. For example, I just checked the Wikipedia page for Proskauer Rose, my old firm, and noticed a factual error -- the New York office has not been located at 1585 Broadway &quot;throughout its history.&quot; It moved there in 1989, I believe, from more cramped quarters over on Fifth Ave. So if I was still at Proskauer, and fixed it while at work, this might reflect a slow work day, but is otherwise untroubling, I think.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By itself, this is not terribly surprising. For example, I just checked the Wikipedia page for Proskauer Rose, my old firm, and noticed a factual error &#8212; the New York office has not been located at 1585 Broadway &#8220;throughout its history.&#8221; It moved there in 1989, I believe, from more cramped quarters over on Fifth Ave. So if I was still at Proskauer, and fixed it while at work, this might reflect a slow work day, but is otherwise untroubling, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric @ New York Personal  Injury Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/a_slow_day_at_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-52758</link>
		<dc:creator>eric @ New York Personal  Injury Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/08/a-slow-day-at-the-office-lawyers-editing-on-wikipedia.html#comment-52758</guid>
		<description>This is not a critique or a negative posted by the firm, but might be a cousin:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorkpersonalinjuryattorneyblog.com/2007/08/duplicity-at-wachtell-lipton.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Duplicity at Wachtell Lipton?&lt;/a&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a critique or a negative posted by the firm, but might be a cousin:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newyorkpersonalinjuryattorneyblog.com/2007/08/duplicity-at-wachtell-lipton.html" rel="nofollow">Duplicity at Wachtell Lipton?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
