Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

Search


Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

jr_12809_9780195367195_bnr.JPG

ad-logo5.jpg

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments

    • Bruce Boyden on Lori Drew Tentatively Acquitted

    • alex on Lori Drew Tentatively Acquitted

    • Dan Culley on Perils of a “Lightly Regulated” Insurance Market

    • Frank Pasquale on Financial Innovation?

    • Robyn A on Lori Drew Tentatively Acquitted

    • Bruce Boyden on Lori Drew Tentatively Acquitted

    • Larry Rosenthal on Truthseeking and Criminal Procedure in the Supreme Court’s Last Term

    • Howard Wasserman on Truthseeking and Criminal Procedure in the Supreme Court’s Last Term

    • Adam on Financial Innovation?

    • Amy on Truthseeking and Criminal Procedure in the Supreme Court’s Last Term

    • cjmajor on Lori Drew Tentatively Acquitted

    • cj on Lori Drew Tentatively Acquitted

    • Howard Wasserman on Truthseeking and Criminal Procedure in the Supreme Court’s Last Term

    • Colin Miller on Truthseeking and Criminal Procedure in the Supreme Court’s Last Term

    • concerned mom on The Lori Drew Trial: Verdict

  •  

    Site Meter

The Tragic End of Wigs

posted by Nate Oman

judge-wig.jpgI am deeply saddened to learn that the British judiciary and legal professional will be abandoning wigs and gowns for civil litigation (although the fancy dress will remain — for the time being — in criminal trials). There are lots of ways of thinking about this tragedy. For example, one might see it as the creeping triumph of Thomas Jefferson — the fiend who nixed wigs for the American legal profession. My own sense is that it is a further demystification of the law and a move to conceptualize courts as simply another bureaucracy and the legal profession as just another job. I am opposed.

Of course, since at least Holmes it has be de rigeour for American legal intellectuals to treat the mystification of the law as nothing more than obfuscating nonsense. We are all for hard-headed realism about laws, judges, and lawyers. There is much to be said for this, but it think that it dramatically under estimates the importance of tradition, ritual, and mystique in contributing to judicial legitimacy. I also think that rituals are not simply for the hoi polloi. They also have a salutory effect on those who participate. I’ve heard more than one judge talk of the emotional and intellectual burden they feel when donning the judicial robe. This is good. I think that our judges are better for frequent, tactile reminders of their special role. I think that the American legal profession is weaker for lack of similar rituals and sacred clothing. Being required to dress up for a certain role is likely to concentrate the mind more fully on the role. Plus, barrister’s garb just looks cool.

Shame on the English.


 July 13, 2007 at 12:24 pm   Posted in: Uncategorized   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (12)

  1. Patrick S. O'Donnell - July 13, 2007 at 1:00 pm

    I wholeheartedly concur. I especially like the phrase, “tactile reminders of their special role.”

    Placed alongside some of the needless proposed changes in the House of Lords, I’m beginning to think the English have lost all sense of direction, sophrosyne, and cultural self-confidence.

  2. Patrick S. O'Donnell - July 13, 2007 at 1:00 pm

    I wholeheartedly concur. I especially like the phrase, “tactile reminders of their special role.”

    Placed alongside some of the needless proposed changes in the House of Lords, I’m beginning to think the English have lost all sense of direction, sophrosyne, and cultural self-confidence.

  3. Mike O'Shea - July 13, 2007 at 1:13 pm

    Nate’s point is straight Burke (”the decent drapery of life”), and in this instance I agree.

    It’s like U.S. lawyers going from navy suits to polo shirts in the office. Once you abandon a tradition, it’s hard to get it back.

    As for contemporary Britain in general, don’t get me started.

  4. Mike O'Shea - July 13, 2007 at 1:13 pm

    Nate’s point is straight Burke (”the decent drapery of life”), and in this instance I agree.

    It’s like U.S. lawyers going from navy suits to polo shirts in the office. Once you abandon a tradition, it’s hard to get it back.

    As for contemporary Britain in general, don’t get me started.

  5. guest - July 13, 2007 at 1:50 pm

    C’mon Nate: We all know the profession already jumped the shark with the abandonment of Law French.

  6. Dave - July 13, 2007 at 1:57 pm

    I have a special role! I have a special role!

  7. Nate Oman - July 13, 2007 at 2:06 pm

    “We all know the profession already jumped the shark with the abandonment of Law French.”

    Indeed…

  8. Patrick S. O'Donnell - July 13, 2007 at 2:59 pm

    Instead of Edmund Burke who, after all, often mystifies tradition (tradition for tradition’s sake; i.e., I don’t think Burke really helps us appreciate why tradition(s) are of value, or what persuasive reasons might be enlisted on behalf of, say, ritual), I suggest we look at the Confucian (and neo-Confucian) conception of li (holy ritual, social norms, rituals of propriety, social ‘grammar,’ conventions, etiquette, etc.) by way of understanding what may be at stake here, in other words, for a provocative theory of “ritual” in a rather expansive sense. See, for instance:

    Ames, Roger T. and Henry Rosemont, Jr., trans. (with intro.). (1998) The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Chong, Kim-chong. (2007) Early Confucian Ethics. Chicago, IL: Open Court.

    Fingarette, Herbert. (1972) Confucius: The Secular as Sacred. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Goldin, Paul Rakita. (1999) Rituals of the Way: The Philosophy of Xunzi. Chicago, IL: Open Court.

    Hall, David L. and Roger T. Ames. (1987) Thinking Through Confucius. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Liu, JeeLoo. (2006) An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy: From Ancient Philosophy to Chinese Buddhism. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Nylan, Michael. (2001) The Five “Confucian” Classics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Shun, Kwong-loi and David B. Wong, eds. (2004) Confucian Ethics: A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy, and Community. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Slingerland, Edward, trans. (2003) Confucius: Analects (with selections from traditional commentaries). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publ.

    Van Norden, Bryan W., ed. (2002) Confucius and the Analects: New Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.

  9. Patrick S. O'Donnell - July 13, 2007 at 2:59 pm

    Instead of Edmund Burke who, after all, often mystifies tradition (tradition for tradition’s sake; i.e., I don’t think Burke really helps us appreciate why tradition(s) are of value, or what persuasive reasons might be enlisted on behalf of, say, ritual), I suggest we look at the Confucian (and neo-Confucian) conception of li (holy ritual, social norms, rituals of propriety, social ‘grammar,’ conventions, etiquette, etc.) by way of understanding what may be at stake here, in other words, for a provocative theory of “ritual” in a rather expansive sense. See, for instance:

    Ames, Roger T. and Henry Rosemont, Jr., trans. (with intro.). (1998) The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Chong, Kim-chong. (2007) Early Confucian Ethics. Chicago, IL: Open Court.

    Fingarette, Herbert. (1972) Confucius: The Secular as Sacred. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Goldin, Paul Rakita. (1999) Rituals of the Way: The Philosophy of Xunzi. Chicago, IL: Open Court.

    Hall, David L. and Roger T. Ames. (1987) Thinking Through Confucius. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Liu, JeeLoo. (2006) An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy: From Ancient Philosophy to Chinese Buddhism. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Nylan, Michael. (2001) The Five “Confucian” Classics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Shun, Kwong-loi and David B. Wong, eds. (2004) Confucian Ethics: A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy, and Community. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Slingerland, Edward, trans. (2003) Confucius: Analects (with selections from traditional commentaries). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publ.

    Van Norden, Bryan W., ed. (2002) Confucius and the Analects: New Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.

  10. Frank - July 13, 2007 at 5:23 pm

    I approve the wigs for Benthamite reasons–much cheaper to throw those on than invest in nice haircuts/”product”.

    Moreover, gowns are great for hiding a cheap suit.

    Anything to stop positional competition for appearance is all to the good! see

    http://www.chas.uchicago.edu/documents/MD0607/Are%

    20Positional%20Externalities%20Different.pdf

  11. Frank - July 13, 2007 at 5:30 pm

    PS: for those piqued by references to “law french,” check out this intro to Ian Shapiro’s “Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences”:

    http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/i8083.pdf

  12. LM - July 14, 2007 at 11:50 pm

    Oh dear. Really? I was hoping that this post was written in jest, but…

    Regarding the demystification of the law: Is this really such an awful phenomenon? Drawing a parallel between law and religion (humor me), was the Protestant Reformation such a terrible thing for religion? (Wars and religious sectarianism aside.) Perhaps this is taking an unsophisticated view, but I would argue that the law should be more, not less, accessible.

    Moving on…

    Regarding the relationship between ceremonial garb and judicial performance: If American judges were made to don a wig and a (more) formal robe, would that make them any less likely to fall asleep in court? Relatedly, did Rehnquist’s chevron stripes cause him to bear his role with greater solemnity? (His stripes were inspired by a costume worn in a comic opera about fairies; key word: “comic”. Hardly a deferential gesture to the solemnity of one’s role as the CJ of the Supreme Court, wouldn’t you agree?)

    Those seeking to identify remnants of tradition in the U.S. legal system might take solace in the fact that the Solicitor General is still expected to play dress-up before the Supreme Court. Well, then, at least one person can be expected to take his job seriously.

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove

Website
Understanding Privacy

Kaimipono Wenger

Website
SSRN Page

Dave Hoffman

Website
SSRN Page

Nate Oman

Website
SSRN Page

Frank Pasquale

Website
SSRN Page

Deven Desai

Website
SSRN Page

Michael O'Shea

Website
SSRN Page

Sarah Waldeck

Website
SSRN Page

Lawrence Cunningham

Website
SSRN Page

Danielle Citron

Website
SSRN Page

Jaya Ramji-Nogales

Website
SSRN Page

Solangel Maldonado

Website
SSRN Page

Gerard Magliocca

Website
SSRN Page


Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Robert Hillman
Kevin Johnson
Sarah Lawsky
Robert Percival
Jenia Turner






Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Ann Bartow
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
David Fagundes
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Dan Kahan
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Chimène Keitner
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
David Post
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Susan Scafidi
Paul Secunda
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Steve Vladeck
Sarah Waldeck
Melissa Waters
Alfred Yen
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Howard Wasserman
Frank Wu
Corey Yung
Jonathan Zittrain

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress