<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outsourcing Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/07/outsourcing_law_1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/07/outsourcing_law_1.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:02:27 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pradeep Satyaprakash</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/07/outsourcing_law_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-53296</link>
		<dc:creator>Pradeep Satyaprakash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/07/outsourcing-law.html#comment-53296</guid>
		<description>I have been following the outsourcing sector for many years and I see your similar arguments used by other industries when first examining outsourcing.  However, one later finds that knowledge is indeed portable.

It started first with outsourcing back-office tasks, now it involves reading and interpreting medical tests (MRI, X-Rays, CAT scans), research and development in high technology fields, tax preparation, software development, and other creative endeavors.

Unless your work requires physical presence to be effective, it can be outsourced.

Expect to see more of these types of firms coming up in the years ahead.  And with time will come the expertise and know-how to understand the historical and culutural contexts of the law.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been following the outsourcing sector for many years and I see your similar arguments used by other industries when first examining outsourcing.  However, one later finds that knowledge is indeed portable.</p>
<p>It started first with outsourcing back-office tasks, now it involves reading and interpreting medical tests (MRI, X-Rays, CAT scans), research and development in high technology fields, tax preparation, software development, and other creative endeavors.</p>
<p>Unless your work requires physical presence to be effective, it can be outsourced.</p>
<p>Expect to see more of these types of firms coming up in the years ahead.  And with time will come the expertise and know-how to understand the historical and culutural contexts of the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Graves</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/07/outsourcing_law_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-53295</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Graves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 07:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/07/outsourcing-law.html#comment-53295</guid>
		<description>Was the disclaimer and forum selection language on the web site, in their e-mail, or in sample contract language?  It seems odd to claim a forum selection agreement based on an e-mail.  Is it common to have an enforceable forum selection clause in web site terms of use?

As for your third question, I think the answer, unfortunately, is that law is very portable.  Knowledge service jobs only require knowledge and bandwidth.  Distance doesn&#039;t matter.  Experience matters, but how much does experience matter in entry-level work?  Do you doubt that overseas workers could be educated to the same level as many new U.S. law grads?  How about paralegals?  What happens when these people have been researching and writing for five to ten years?  Would they really have less experience than U.S. ABA-approved attorneys who also never saw a courtroom during that time?

If you want an outsource-proof job, learn to be a plumber or barber.  Litigators are also pretty safe, because proximity to court and witnesses and evidence and such matters.  But if your job  can be done anywhere, it probably will be.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was the disclaimer and forum selection language on the web site, in their e-mail, or in sample contract language?  It seems odd to claim a forum selection agreement based on an e-mail.  Is it common to have an enforceable forum selection clause in web site terms of use?</p>
<p>As for your third question, I think the answer, unfortunately, is that law is very portable.  Knowledge service jobs only require knowledge and bandwidth.  Distance doesn&#8217;t matter.  Experience matters, but how much does experience matter in entry-level work?  Do you doubt that overseas workers could be educated to the same level as many new U.S. law grads?  How about paralegals?  What happens when these people have been researching and writing for five to ten years?  Would they really have less experience than U.S. ABA-approved attorneys who also never saw a courtroom during that time?</p>
<p>If you want an outsource-proof job, learn to be a plumber or barber.  Litigators are also pretty safe, because proximity to court and witnesses and evidence and such matters.  But if your job  can be done anywhere, it probably will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn Elefant</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/07/outsourcing_law_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-53294</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn Elefant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 06:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/07/outsourcing-law.html#comment-53294</guid>
		<description>Lawyers use summer associates for research, but they are not licensed to practice law.  How is that different from outsourcing a project for research?  Ultimately, the supervising lawyer is responsible.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawyers use summer associates for research, but they are not licensed to practice law.  How is that different from outsourcing a project for research?  Ultimately, the supervising lawyer is responsible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
