<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking for Lawyers in all the Wrong Places?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/07/looking_for_law.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/07/looking_for_law.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:10:41 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abulifia</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/07/looking_for_law.html/comment-page-1#comment-53086</link>
		<dc:creator>Abulifia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/07/looking-for-lawyers-in-all-the-wrong-places.html#comment-53086</guid>
		<description>Avvo.com isn&#039;t worth the time.  I submitted a review for an atty warning others *not* to use him because he is crooked and incompetent.  I even had to file a complaint against him with the State Bar, but Avvo never published that review.  In fact, if you bother to search *any* atty review on their site, you will only find *glowing* reviews.  What good is the site if it censors reality?  Avvo is substandard, IMO.  Don&#039;t bother using it unless you want to read nothing but sugary goodness.  Their atty profiles are not accurate representations of reality.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avvo.com isn&#8217;t worth the time.  I submitted a review for an atty warning others *not* to use him because he is crooked and incompetent.  I even had to file a complaint against him with the State Bar, but Avvo never published that review.  In fact, if you bother to search *any* atty review on their site, you will only find *glowing* reviews.  What good is the site if it censors reality?  Avvo is substandard, IMO.  Don&#8217;t bother using it unless you want to read nothing but sugary goodness.  Their atty profiles are not accurate representations of reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conrad Saam</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/07/looking_for_law.html/comment-page-1#comment-53085</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad Saam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/07/looking-for-lawyers-in-all-the-wrong-places.html#comment-53085</guid>
		<description>Frank - many thanks for the post on Avvo.  Since launch, we&#039;ve added a variety of features to make the site increasingly useful and relevant to consumers (and lawyers, like yourself who may serve as a reference for consumers).  You now have my email address, I&#039;d be interested in hearing your stories of how you&#039;ve used Avvo, or suggestions for features.

-Conrad from Avvo

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank &#8211; many thanks for the post on Avvo.  Since launch, we&#8217;ve added a variety of features to make the site increasingly useful and relevant to consumers (and lawyers, like yourself who may serve as a reference for consumers).  You now have my email address, I&#8217;d be interested in hearing your stories of how you&#8217;ve used Avvo, or suggestions for features.</p>
<p>-Conrad from Avvo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Cartier Liebel</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/07/looking_for_law.html/comment-page-1#comment-53084</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Cartier Liebel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/07/looking-for-lawyers-in-all-the-wrong-places.html#comment-53084</guid>
		<description>You should be going right to your alumni office and finding out which graduates are serving these very practice areas (preferably those in their own firms) so you can be a valued resource for both your students and those friends, colleagues and others who see you as a such.  Don&#039;t have them rely on rating systems which are fraught with misinformation and gamesmanship.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should be going right to your alumni office and finding out which graduates are serving these very practice areas (preferably those in their own firms) so you can be a valued resource for both your students and those friends, colleagues and others who see you as a such.  Don&#8217;t have them rely on rating systems which are fraught with misinformation and gamesmanship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
