<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When the Roberts Court Turns Into the Kennedy Court: End-of-Term Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/06/scotus_end_of_t.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/06/scotus_end_of_t.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:19:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/06/scotus_end_of_t.html/comment-page-1#comment-53402</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 20:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/06/when-the-roberts-court-turns-into-the-kennedy-court-end-of-term-thoughts.html#comment-53402</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s also left in suspense is what happens when two segments of the business community are in conflict...as, say, in the patent cases.

I like your Kuhnian take on Kennedy rhetoric; for a nice commentary on the problem of revolutionary science in patent jurisprudence, see

http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/04/30/thoughts-on-ksr-3/

on &quot;the Supreme Court’s somewhat opaque and occasionally florid instructions&quot; on interpreting the statute.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s also left in suspense is what happens when two segments of the business community are in conflict&#8230;as, say, in the patent cases.</p>
<p>I like your Kuhnian take on Kennedy rhetoric; for a nice commentary on the problem of revolutionary science in patent jurisprudence, see</p>
<p><a href="http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/04/30/thoughts-on-ksr-3/" rel="nofollow">http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/04/30/thoughts-on-ksr-3/</a></p>
<p>on &#8220;the Supreme Court’s somewhat opaque and occasionally florid instructions&#8221; on interpreting the statute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
