Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

Search


Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

jr_114_9780195367195_bnr

jr_114_9780195383768_bnr

advertise-here4


FC-CO(SS)

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments

    • Observer on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • RJ on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • RJ on Ricci and Briscoe as Disparate Impact Cases

    • Mike Rich on Negligent Corpse Mishandling

    • anon on Privacy and Tattletales

    • orly lobel on At CELS, Hoping to Blog

    • harry brooks on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • RJ on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • Michael H Schneider on Negligent Corpse Mishandling

    • flood pictures on Public opinion on same-sex marriage

    • gtownstudent on And Justache For All at GW Law

    • AF on Ricci and Briscoe as Disparate Impact Cases

    • RJ on Ricci and Briscoe as Disparate Impact Cases

    • Maryland Conservatarian on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • Daniel S. Goldberg on Negligent Corpse Mishandling

  •  

    Site Meter

Why So Few Black Ballerinas?

posted by Solangel Maldonado

There was an interesting article in yesterday’s NY Times discussing the absence of Black ballerinas in prominent ballet companies in the U.S. The reasons are many and complex, including economic (ballet is expensive), the pool of qualified dancers is very small, and access to ballet training is quite limited in the U.S. But I was struck by the suggestion that ballet companies are reluctant to hire even exceptionally gifted Black ballerinas because they are afraid to challenge their subscriber base and their expectation of “a ballet company, the way you thought ballet was.” Other Black ballerinas suggested that stereotyping of Black women was a major obstacle to their success because “Black women are perceived as being forceful, which doesn’t square with the ethereal image of a ballerina.”

I must confess that my exposure to ballet is quite limited. Thus, I found it hard to believe that dance companies would pass up the opportunity to recruit talented dancers because they feared their audience reaction. Then I remembered a column which appeared in the NY Times Magazine last December. A reader asked “The Ethicist” columnist whether she was racist because her enjoyment of “The Nutcracker” ballet had been “severely marred by the appearance of a black snowflake and then, even worse, a black Snow King.” According to this anonymous reader, “the aesthetic incongruity was inconceivable. The entire ballet was spoiled.” I am not sure what to make of this reader’s question, but it does suggest that ballet companies’ concerns about their audience’s ability to welcome Black dancers are not completely unfounded. Any thoughts?


 May 7, 2007 at 10:48 am   Posted in: Feminism and Gender, Race   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (7)

  1. Frank - May 7, 2007 at 12:55 pm

    Even if they are only reacting to expected negative audience response, that’s still a Palmore problem, I would imagine. e.g.,

    “In Palmore, a dispute over custody of a child, the divorced mother and father were both white; the mother, who had initially been granted custody, remarried with an African American man. A local judge in Florida, citing the prejudice that a child would suffer from growing up in an interracial household, then awarded custody of the child to the father,

    saying that that action was in the best interests of the child. The Supreme Court did not question

    the trial court’s factual findings about the difficulties the child would face; indeed the Court explicitly acknowledged the “risk” that the child would be harmed.”

    But “The Court declared that “the law cannot, directly or indirectly, give … effect” to the

    “private biases” directed at the interracial couple, notwithstanding their “reality … and the injury they might inflict.”

    from

    http://www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1041&context=ils

    Moreover, I would think aesthetic responses would be far more malleable than the types of prejudice at issue in Palmore. IF a few tastemakers start valuing diverse performers, I would think the audience would follow. Indeed, there’s often only one ballet company in a city–to whom will they defect?

  2. AYY - May 9, 2007 at 1:00 am

    What was the answer to the reader’s question? If it was the NY Times ethicist, I suspect, although I don’t know, that he might have told her it was okay as long as she votes the right way.

    Actually I have to wonder why someone would ask someone else (much less someone who works for the NY Times of all places) if her aesthetic preference makes her a racist. It seems to me she’s looking for external validation that she’s not a bad person.

  3. Solangel Maldonado - May 9, 2007 at 8:23 am

    The Ethicist replied that this does make her “a racist – not in the sense of exercising a virulent antipathy toward African-Americans but of being, like most of us, affected by feelings about race.”

    I agree that this reader probably wanted someone to tell her that is was okay to have these feelings. It is also quite telling that she does not wish to intentionally discriminate against Black dancers and is questioning her aesthetic preferences. Maybe she should read some of the literature on unconcious racism.

  4. AYY - May 10, 2007 at 3:16 am

    Can’t agree with your last sentence. The literature on unconscious racism is just going to get her all worked up about a problem she doesn’t show any sign of having.

    If you’re right in conveying what the Ethicist said, then he’s playing semantic games rather than answering her question. I would think that racism involves making unjustified negative generalizations. If the Ethicist defines racism the way he did, then he can call anyone he wants a racist. But then maybe his point was to try to make her feel guilty.

    Also, he has no basis to draw the conclusions he did about her. She gave no indication of being affected by feelings toward race in any way other than the most obvious ones. There was no disparagement of Black people in her aesthetic preference. She merely referred to an obvious external characteristic. So as I see it, she hasn’t shown any signs of racism, conscious or unconscious.

  5. steph - June 5, 2007 at 5:35 am

    Racism 1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.

    2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.

    The lady is racist. I can’t fathom why one would ever say such a comment wasn’t. Its classic racism. Now if it was a matter of a ballet being ruined because the only black dancers in the show added a different style of hip rolling, soulful movement (for example)to their steps, therefore standing out in that manner, I would understand where the lady, excuse me woman (she is in no way a lady for that defines a “well-mannered and considerate woman with high standards of proper behavior.” ) was coming from. In that case the event would have been an act of disrespect to long lived traditions of ballet. Sadly this was not the case for her at all. It was not the style of dance but the color of skin and/or “cultural backround” of the dancers. I say with quotations because the idea of backround in her view was most likely a stereotype. Nevertheless none of this could have been portrayed in the actual dancing. As a former dancer with training ranging from smaller to some of the most celebrated companies, my opinion is that in order for those dancers to have been chosen for such a prestigious ballet, they had to be good if not some of the best dancers in the show all together. I mean its not like the company doesn’t know of the so called “risks” of black dancers. They could never be mediocre, they would stick out like sore thumbs and encourage the very segregation that this woman would prefer. Too bad she can’t just travel back in time.

  6. Rebecca - March 10, 2009 at 10:28 pm

    Your above comment is pretty ignorant. According to the very definition you posted I see nothing to suggest the woman is racist. She did not comment that the white dancers in the show were superior to the black dancers, merely that she was bothered by the incongruity of the difference between the dancers. Ballet, as an art form, aesthetically focuses on a conformity and unity. Generally, dancers (particularly female dancers) must be within a certain height range (5′4-5′7), most posses a specific body type, and must dance in unison. I can imagine that when trying to portray snowflakes this unity and similarity is even more important. If your offended by this style don’t watch or dance ballet, patronize another dance form. This isnt to say that racism does not exist in droves in ballet. It does. But the above example is very poor.

  7. Rebecca - March 10, 2009 at 10:30 pm

    Your above comment is pretty ignorant. According to the very definition you posted I see nothing to suggest the woman is racist. She did not comment that the white dancers in the show were superior to the black dancers, merely that she was bothered by the incongruity of the difference between the dancers. Ballet, as an art form, aesthetically focuses on a conformity and unity. Generally, dancers (particularly female dancers) must be within a certain height range (5′4-5′7), most posses a specific body type, and must dance in unison. I can imagine that when trying to portray snowflakes this unity and similarity is even more important. If your offended by this style don’t watch or dance ballet, patronize another dance form. This isnt to say that racism does not exist in droves in ballet. It does. But the above example is very poor.

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove

Website
Understanding Privacy

Kaimipono Wenger

Website
SSRN Page

Dave Hoffman

Website
SSRN Page

Nate Oman

Website
SSRN Page

Frank Pasquale

Website
SSRN Page

Deven Desai

Website
SSRN Page

Danielle Citron

Website
SSRN Page

Lawrence Cunningham

Website
SSRN Page

Sarah Waldeck

Website
SSRN Page

Jaya Ramji-Nogales

Website
SSRN Page

Solangel Maldonado

Website
SSRN Page

Gerard Magliocca

Website
SSRN Page


Guests

Rachel Godsil
Alex Kreit
Anita Krishnakumar
Matthew Sag
Michael Zimmer






Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Ann Bartow
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
David Fagundes
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
John Ip
Kevin Johnson
Dan Kahan
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
David Post
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Susan Scafidi
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Sarah Waldeck
Melissa Waters
Alfred Yen
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Frank Wu
Corey Yung
Jonathan Zittrain

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress