<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Split-the-Difference-ism:&#8221; Journalistic Heuristic for Credibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/05/splitthediffere.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/05/splitthediffere.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:22:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/05/splitthediffere.html/comment-page-1#comment-54037</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 01:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/05/split-the-difference-ism-journalistic-heuristic-for-credibility.html#comment-54037</guid>
		<description>By the way, when I spoke about diverse methodologies in the post above, here are at least two alternatives to originalism mentioned in Garvey, Aleinikoff &amp; Farber&#039;s Modern Con. Theory (2004):

a) Textualism

b) Evolutionary Theories

with lots of sources on them on p. 190.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, when I spoke about diverse methodologies in the post above, here are at least two alternatives to originalism mentioned in Garvey, Aleinikoff &#038; Farber&#8217;s Modern Con. Theory (2004):</p>
<p>a) Textualism</p>
<p>b) Evolutionary Theories</p>
<p>with lots of sources on them on p. 190.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/05/splitthediffere.html/comment-page-1#comment-54036</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 15:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/05/split-the-difference-ism-journalistic-heuristic-for-credibility.html#comment-54036</guid>
		<description>a: Would you say the same of conservative law professors?  If so, do you think there is any space for people to research to find truth, rather than merely to refine advocacy for pre-selected ideas?

If you really feel that it&#039;s all politics, all the way down, this post may be of interest:

http://balkin.blogspot.com/2007/05/bush-administration-vindicates-critical.html

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a: Would you say the same of conservative law professors?  If so, do you think there is any space for people to research to find truth, rather than merely to refine advocacy for pre-selected ideas?</p>
<p>If you really feel that it&#8217;s all politics, all the way down, this post may be of interest:</p>
<p><a href="http://balkin.blogspot.com/2007/05/bush-administration-vindicates-critical.html" rel="nofollow">http://balkin.blogspot.com/2007/05/bush-administration-vindicates-critical.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GXM</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/05/splitthediffere.html/comment-page-1#comment-54035</link>
		<dc:creator>GXM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 06:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/05/split-the-difference-ism-journalistic-heuristic-for-credibility.html#comment-54035</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Are the &quot;liberal&quot; results from the &quot;liberal&quot; law professor just a product of his/her ideology? &lt;/i&gt;

Of course.  Speaking seriously, does anyone think to the contrary?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Are the &#8220;liberal&#8221; results from the &#8220;liberal&#8221; law professor just a product of his/her ideology? </i></p>
<p>Of course.  Speaking seriously, does anyone think to the contrary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
