Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 


advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Cardozo Law School's Susan Crawford battles telecom giants, per NYT here.  (LAC)

University governance as a new topic of public discussion.

An unusual profile of Mary Anne Franks (kw)

Aggressive copyright litigation run amok. (fp)

USA Today's Matt Krantz quoting me on Warren Buffett joining Twitter.  (LAC)

Private prisons? Why, sure! What could possibly go wrong? (kw)

TNR profiles Susan Crawford (kw)

Berkshire Hathaway is bigger than Warren Buffett.  Manual of Ideas (LAC).

Guns don't shoot people, kitchen appliances shoot people (kw)

Via Glom, Sat Eve Post review of The Essays of Warren Buffett.


Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Matt on Warren Buffett: Practical Philosopher of Capitalism

    • Personal Injury Lawyer on Privacy Self-Management and the Consent Dilemma

    • Lawrence Cunningham on Mr. Buffett Joins a Board

    • Guy Spier on Mr. Buffett Joins a Board

    • John Mihaljevic on Mr. Buffett Joins a Board

    • Kal on Towards Responsible Use of Cognition-Dulling Drugs

    • anon on The Pervasive Role of Priors: Part One

    • Joe on Kentucky: Boy, 5, Kills Sister, 2

    • mls on Copyright’s Constitutional Chameleon

    • Shag from Brookline on Kentucky: Boy, 5, Kills Sister, 2

    • Brett Bellmore on Kentucky: Boy, 5, Kills Sister, 2

    • Daniel Barth-Jones on Re-Identification Risks and Myths, Superusers and Super Stories (Part II: Superusers and Super Stories)

    • Daniel Barth-Jones on Re-Identification Risks and Myths, Superusers and Super Stories (Part I: Risks and Myths)

    • Daniel Barth-Jones on Re-Identification Risks and Myths, Superusers and Super Stories (Part II: Superusers and Super Stories)

    • Daniel Barth-Jones on Re-Identification Risks and Myths, Superusers and Super Stories (Part I: Risks and Myths)
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

Scientists Manques?

posted by Frank Pasquale

Ever wonder why Richard Posner has gotten so interested in pragmatism? Well, James R. Hackney’s book Under Cover of Science: American Legal-Economic Theory and the Quest for Objectivity suggests that he’s right to be looking for a post-scientific discourse for the style of law & economics he advances. Here’s an abstract of Hackney’s work:

The current dominant strand of legal economic theory is what is commonly referred to as law and economics (but more appropriately labeled “law and neoclassical economics”). [This movement] gained its claim to objectivity based on the philosophical premises of logical positivism and the analytic philosophy movement generally. . . . In understanding the claim of objectivity in the law and neoclassical economics movement and why that claim can no longer be sustained (in part due to new conceptions of science and developments in philosophy) it is crucial that legal-academics have a fuller understanding of developments in science and how they shape our general cultural ethos.

Hackney synthesizes a wide variety of CLS and socio-economic critiques to show how “law and economics often cloaks ideological determinations—particularly regarding the distribution of wealth—under the cover of science.” Toward the end of the book he tentatively points a way forward for the discipline, urging greater humility about theoretical claims and greater reliance on empirical work. In other words, the cure for scientism is genuine science.

I have some sympathy with this perspective, and new awareness of “uniformity costs” in both law and legal scholarship backs up Hackney’s position. But the problem of “scientism” may extend beyond law and neoclassical economics…


For example, consider this claim by Julie Cohen in her extraordinarily illuminating article Creativity and Culture in Copyright Theory:

[T]he purported advantage of rights theories and economic theories is neither precisely that they are normative nor precisely that they are scientific, but that they do normative work in a scientific way. Their normative heft derives from a small number of formal principles and purports to concern questions that are a step or two removed from the particular question of policy to be decided. . . . These theories manifest a quasi-scientific neutrality as to copyright law that consists precisely in the high degree of abstraction with which they facilitate thinking about processes of cultural transmission.

Cohen notes “copyright scholars’ aversion to the complexities of cultural theory, which persistently violates those principles.” But she feels they should embrace it, given that it offers “account[s] of the nature and development of knowledge that [are] both far more robust and far more nuanced than anything that liberal political philosophy has to offer. . . . [particularly in understanding] how existing knowledge systems have evolved, and how they are encoded and enforced.”

I think Cohen’s observations here are relevant to many areas of legal scholarship. Good work need not be measured by the degree to which it mirrors experiment in the natural sciences. . . . or the degree to which it “do[es] normative work in a scientific way.” Sometimes the effort to emphasize “questions that are a step or two removed from the particular question of policy to be decided” amounts to little more than a Kabuki dance designed to give the appearance of engaging with one’s critics. Sometimes abstraction obscures the practical consequences of decisions easily justified sub species aeternitatis. I plan to show that idea a little more concretely in some posts on legal scholarship’s engagement with the idea of positional goods later this week.


 May 3, 2007 at 10:24 am   Posted in: Behavioral Law and Economics, Economic Analysis of Law, Empirical Analysis of Law, Philosophy of Social Science, Sociology of Law   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (4)

  1. greglas - May 3, 2007 at 1:13 pm

    Great post, Frank — and I’m looking forward to your ideas on positional goods.

  2. Daniel Goldberg - May 4, 2007 at 4:06 pm

    Hey Frank,

    I sent a trackback but just wanted to let you know my thoughts on this post are here:

    http://www.medhumanities.org/2007/05/on_scientism.html

  3. Patrick S. O'Donnell - May 4, 2007 at 6:03 pm

    The following list is from a larger compilation on the philosophy of science. I share several of Daniel’s concerns and for some time now have been interested in questions surrounding the nature and methods of the natural and social sciences and the seductions of scientism. I’ve left out classical works by Nagel, Hempel, Lakatos, Kuhn, and the like and of course there’s no one viewpoint represented by these titles, but they should help one to gain some measure of clarity on the subject broached by Frank and further discussed by Daniel (without implying either one would endorse all the titles here or that we are all in agreement on identifiying the locus (or loci) of the problem(s), let alone on possible answers or solutions).

    Barbour, Ian G. Myths, Models, and Paradigms. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.

    Brown, Theodore L. Making Truth: Metaphor in Science. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2003.

    Cartwright, Nancy. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

    Cartwright, Nancy. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1983.

    Cohen, I. Bernard. Interactions: Some Contacts Between the Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.

    Dupré, John. Human Nature and the Limits of Science. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 2001.

    Elster, Jon. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

    Fuller, Steve. The Governance of Science. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press, 2000.

    Fuller, Steve. Philosophy of Science and Its Discontents. New York: The Guilford Press, Second ed., 1993.

    Fuller, Steve. Science. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.

    Fuller, Steve. Social Epistemology. Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press, 1988.

    Giere, Ronald N. Science without Laws. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1999.

    Goldman, Alvin. Knowledge in a Social World. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.

    Hallyn, Fernand, ed. Metaphor and Analogy in the Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publ., 2000.

    Hesse, Mary. Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1980.

    Keller, Evelyn Fox. Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors, and Machines. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.

    Kincaid, Harold. Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

    Kitcher, Philip. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1993.

    Kitcher, Philip. In Mendel’s Mirror: Philosophical Reflections on Biology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.

    Kitcher, Philip. Science, Truth, and Democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2001.

    Kitcher, Philip. Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.

    Lewontin, Richard. Biology as Ideology. New York: HarperPerennial, 1991.

    Lewontin, Richard. It Ain’t Necessarily So: The Dream of the Human Genome and Other Illusions. New York: New York Review Books, 2000.

    Longino, Helen E. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.

    Longino, Helen E. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.

    McCloskey, Donald N. Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

    Miller, Richard W. Fact and Method: Explanation, Confirmation and Reality in the Natural and Social Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987.

    Mirowski, Philip. Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

    Newell, R.W. Objectivity, Empiricism and Truth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986.

    Rescher, Nicholas. The Limits of Science. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984.

    Rescher, Nicholas. Nature and Understanding: The Metaphysics and Method of Science. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 2000.

    Shapiro, Ian. The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.

    Toulmin, Stephen. Foresight & Understanding: An Inquiry into the Aims of Science. New York: Harpercollins, 1980.

    van Fraassen, Bas C. The Empirical Stance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002.

    Ziman, John. Real Science: What It Is, and What It Means. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

    And two important articles by John D. Norton, both of which should be available at his webpage in the Dept. of History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh: ‘A Material Theory of Induction’ (2003), and ‘A Little Survey of Induction, (2003).

  4. The Oracle of Syracuse - October 2, 2008 at 1:36 pm

    I find the use of critical legal studies to show how an ostensibly objective school of legal thought is in reality a “cloak” for hidden “ideological determinations” to be deeply ironic to the point of self-parody.

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Kelli A. Alces
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ryan Calo
Claire Hill
Jay Kesten
William McGeveran
Meredith Render
Aaron Saiger
David L. Schwartz
Olivier Sylvain
Charles K. Whitehead
Aaron Zelinsky


















Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Derek Bambauer
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Khiara Bridges
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Gabriella Coleman
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
andré douglas pond cummings
Allison Danner
Laura DeNardis
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Susan Freiwald
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Vivian E. Hamilton
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Angela Harris
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Tayyab Mahmud
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Janai Nelson
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
David Opderback
David Orentlicher
Michael O'Shea
Kristen Osenga
Mary-Rose Papandrea
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
William Reynolds
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Brishen Rogers
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schleicher
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Lea Shaver
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Peter Swire
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Joseph Turow
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Elizabeth A. Wilson
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
Privacy and Security Training
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress