Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Groundhog Day. (fp)

Banned in Tucson. (kw)

The Best and Worst of 2011 in Race and Law (kw)

Tortured to death for trespassing. (fp)

Drones of contention. (fp)

DOJ still coddling banks. (fp)

Creative destruction? Thank banks. (fp)

Blog about a new book, on how to talk to little girls--stressing smarts not cutes.   LAC

Macey on the heroic Rakoff. (fp)

Captured NY Fed. (fp)


solicitors

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Shag from Brookline on Omelets and Eggs

    • Shag from Brookline on Omelets and Eggs

    • Joe on What Exactly is Wrong With Polygamy?

    • Phil on What Exactly is Wrong With Polygamy?

    • Lee on Lifecycles and the Firm

    • Car accident claim lawyers on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • Andrew MacKie-Mason on Can't the Supreme Court Just Say No to Cameras?

    • Joe on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Shag from Brookline on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Joe on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Joe on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Shag from Brookline on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • G. Calamita on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • Joe on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Howard Wasserman on Can't the Supreme Court Just Say No to Cameras?
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

Improving Casebooks with Fiction

posted by Nate Oman

flyingsaucer.jpgNot surprisingly, since my secured transactions professor was Elizabeth Warren, I learned Article 9 using Warren & Lopucki’s casebook. In retrospect there are things about the book that bother me. It’s hyper law-in-action approach at times made the doctrine quite a bit muddier than it needed to be, and I tend to think that the realist claim about the uselessness of legal doctrine is a fallacy. On the other hand, it did include Tom Wolfe’s foray into the drama of commercial lending in The Man in Full, a novel that, among other things, takes readers into a workout session between a well-secured bank and an imploding real estate developer. It makes me wonder about the use (or potential use) of passages from novels in casebooks.

As far as I know no one has done so yet but I think that Christopher Buckley’s novel Little Green Men merits a place in any self-respecting administrative law casebook. The book follows the downward spiral of an inside-the-beltway, Sunday morning talkshow host who is abducted by aliens and leaves the inner corridors of the Establishment to lead the unwashed masses of UFO believers in a march on Washington. The alien abductors, of course, turn out to be agents of a secret government bureaucracy called Magestic or MJ-12. The novel provides a brief institutional history of MJ-12, charting its rise from an innocent ploy to fool Stalin in the late 1940s into huge bureeaucracy pursuing a different mission. It is one of the better description of bureaucratic evolution I read:

Then, as with so many other government programs, the original plan gave way to bigger things. . . . They decided that as long as they were at it, MJ-12 could serve another, even higher purpose: keeping the taxpaying U.S. citizenry alarmed about the possibility of invasion from outer space, and therefore happy to fund expansion of the military-aerospace complex. A country convinced that little green men were hovering over the rooftops was inclined to vote yea for big weapons and space programs.

So what began a half century ago with the towing of some pie-shaped reflective disks behind a camouflaged aircraft over Washington State soon evolved into a “black” program with a yearly budget running into the tens of millions of dollars. But Americans are easily bored. The problem quickly became how do we keep them interested? After a while, mere sightings of flying saucers just weren’t enough. MJ-12 had to devise more elaborate entertainments: physical evidence, scorch marks in the grass, traumatized animals (easy enough), cars whose batteries had inexplicably gone dead while their occupants were staring google-eyed at the funny lights. When the thrill of disabled vehicles and freaked-out pets wore off, MJ-12 had no choice but to start providing glimpses of the alien darlings themselves. This was trickier. For one thing, it meant finding dwarfs with security clearances. For this reason, aliens have gotten considerably bigger over the years.

And so on. I wonder what other novels could be used (or are used) to illustrate legal issues and make casebooks even more fun and fascinating than they already are.


 May 15, 2007 at 2:09 pm   Posted in: Law School (Teaching)   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (8)

  1. Dude - May 15, 2007 at 4:31 pm

    Indeed.

    As an aside, same novel is being made into a film, with John Malkovich in the lead role.

  2. Edward Swaine - May 16, 2007 at 10:20 am

    William Gaddis’ A Frolic of His Own is a brilliant book that contains telling and amusing illustrations fit for Torts, Property, Civil Procedure, IP . . . The caution is that it’s not terribly easy to excerpt, nor the most accessible.

  3. anon - May 16, 2007 at 12:46 pm

    I’m probably demonstrating the depths of my dorkiness with this comment, but no environmental law casebook is truly complete without excerpts from Kim Stanley Robinson’s Mars trilogy (to my knowledge, no such casebook exists, leaving a gap in the market, I say).

  4. Deven Desai - May 16, 2007 at 2:04 pm

    I am not sure that Catch-22 directly mentions law, but its presentation of administrative systems and rules might fit your request.

  5. Frank - May 16, 2007 at 3:10 pm

    Let me just second Frolic of His Own. What’s amazing is that he actually imagines decisions on summary judgment that are both legally plausible (citing Anderson v. Liberty Lobbby!) and, simultaneously, make all the safeguards built into the process look like a farce.

    (Perhaps that’s because one case arises out of a dispute over a dog trapped in a hulking sculpture, whose maker decides to use the Visual Artists Rights Act to prevent an alteration of the sculpture needed to save the dog.”)…here’s a longer explanation of the issues:

    “Oscar Crease, middle-aged college instructor, savant, and playwright, is suing a Hollywood producer for pirating his play Once at Antietam, based on his grandfather’s experiences in the Civil War, and turning it into a gory blockbuster called The Blood in the Red White and Blue. Oscar’s suit, and a host of others – which involve a dog trapped in an outdoor sculpture, wrongful death during a river baptism, a church versus a soft drink company, and even Oscar himself after he is run over by his own car – engulf all who surround him, from his freewheeling girlfriend to his well-to-do stepsister and her ill-fated husband (a partner in the white-shoe firm of Swyne & Dour), to his draconian, nonagenarian father, Federal Judge Thomas Crease, who has just wielded the long arm of the law to expel God (and Satan) from his courtroom.”

    from

    http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbninquiry.asp?z=y&isbn=0684800527

  6. Mike O'Shea - May 16, 2007 at 4:20 pm

    Anon –

    You may be onto something. When I hear or read an expression of austere environmental/ecological views, I often do think of — wasn’t her name Anne? Anyway, the hardcore “Red” (i.e., ‘leave it all desert’) Martian environmentalist from Robinson’s Mars trilogy.

    I have to admit I liked her.

  7. anon - May 17, 2007 at 9:10 pm

    Dressler’s Criminal Law casebook has an excerpt from Willa Cather’s O Pioneers. The excerpt includes a homicide, with the question being whether it was murder or manslaughter (because it was arguably in the “heat of passion”).

  8. anon - May 17, 2007 at 9:10 pm

    Dressler’s Criminal Law casebook has an excerpt from Willa Cather’s O Pioneers. The excerpt includes a homicide, with the question being whether it was murder or manslaughter (because it was arguably in the “heat of passion”).

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Derek Bambauer
Gabriella Coleman
andré douglas pond cummings
David Gray
Brishen Rogers
Joseph Turow
Elizabeth A. Wilson













Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress