Comments on: Copyright Expansionism’s Colmes http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/05/copyright_expan.html The Law, the Universe, and Everything Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:33:39 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3 hourly 1 By: Frank http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/05/copyright_expan.html/comment-page-1#comment-53844 Frank Fri, 25 May 2007 02:26:37 +0000 http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/05/copyright-expansionisms-colmes.html#comment-53844 An update: AgainstMonopoly.com and Matt Yglesias both have nice responses to the piece. I should have mentioned this piece as well as Menell: Stewart E. Sterk, INTELLECTUALIZING PROPERTY: THE TENUOUS CONNECTIONS BETWEEN LAND AND COPYRIGHT 83 Wash. U. L.Q. 417 (2005). An update: AgainstMonopoly.com and Matt Yglesias both have nice responses to the piece.

I should have mentioned this piece as well as Menell:

Stewart E. Sterk, INTELLECTUALIZING PROPERTY: THE TENUOUS CONNECTIONS BETWEEN LAND AND COPYRIGHT 83 Wash. U. L.Q. 417 (2005).

]]> By: Kim Roosevelt http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/05/copyright_expan.html/comment-page-1#comment-53843 Kim Roosevelt Wed, 23 May 2007 17:34:12 +0000 http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/05/copyright-expansionisms-colmes.html#comment-53843 But could he have spared us the parenthetical about writing the great American novel again? That seems a rather irrelevant pat on the back. But could he have spared us the parenthetical about writing the great American novel again? That seems a rather irrelevant pat on the back.

]]> By: Bruce Boyden http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/05/copyright_expan.html/comment-page-1#comment-53842 Bruce Boyden Mon, 21 May 2007 21:47:39 +0000 http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/05/copyright-expansionisms-colmes.html#comment-53842 I believe the Times writes the title of an op-ed piece, not the author. Helprin shows that he knows the difference between ideas and expression, and which copyright protects, about midway through the piece. I believe the Times writes the title of an op-ed piece, not the author. Helprin shows that he knows the difference between ideas and expression, and which copyright protects, about midway through the piece.

]]>