Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Groundhog Day. (fp)

Banned in Tucson. (kw)

The Best and Worst of 2011 in Race and Law (kw)

Tortured to death for trespassing. (fp)

Drones of contention. (fp)

DOJ still coddling banks. (fp)

Creative destruction? Thank banks. (fp)

Blog about a new book, on how to talk to little girls--stressing smarts not cutes.   LAC

Macey on the heroic Rakoff. (fp)

Captured NY Fed. (fp)


solicitors

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Shag from Brookline on Omelets and Eggs

    • Joe on What Exactly is Wrong With Polygamy?

    • Phil on What Exactly is Wrong With Polygamy?

    • Lee on Lifecycles and the Firm

    • Car accident claim lawyers on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • Andrew MacKie-Mason on Can't the Supreme Court Just Say No to Cameras?

    • Joe on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Shag from Brookline on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Joe on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Joe on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Shag from Brookline on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • G. Calamita on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • Joe on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Howard Wasserman on Can't the Supreme Court Just Say No to Cameras?

    • Gerard Magliocca on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

What I Do For a Living

posted by Nate Oman

Kim’s ruminations on the nature of our profession have got me thinking somewhat less articulate thoughts on being a law professor. I was recently talking with my wife over dinner and she asked me what I had been working on that day. I eagerly replied that I had been researching the legislative history of the Thirteenth Amendment and had found some interesting cases construing apprenticeship agreements under the Northwest Ordinance of 1787. She looked at me somewhat incredulously. I knew what she was thinking.

“You are willing to grant me that teaching students is real work,” I said, “but when I talk about doing my research you think of it as a hobby that I have somehow scammed the Commonwealth of Virginia into paying me for, don’t you?”

“That’s about right,” she said. As near as I can tell, her attitude is shared by virtually all of my family and friends (at least the ones who aren’t professors). It is a wonderful life. I also hasten to add that the legislative history of the Thirteenth Amendment matters a great deal. I am still amazed, however, that I actually get paid for doing what I do.


 April 19, 2007 at 10:46 pm   Posted in: Law School (Scholarship)   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (9)

  1. Brent D - April 20, 2007 at 1:16 am

    Have no fear, there are far greater wastes of tax money than your profession.

  2. NE2d - April 20, 2007 at 12:52 pm

    As a 3L who will be in debt for decades for paying the salaries of people who make a comfortable living working an hour a day, I have to say that the reputation that professors have is richly deserved.

  3. Jeff Lipshaw - April 20, 2007 at 2:56 pm

    Nate, I think your wife has been talking to my wife. Except when I am beaming with pride for having placed an article, she pops the balloon with “so when do you get paid for the articles?”

  4. Miriam Cherry - April 20, 2007 at 5:47 pm

    NE2d, I wonder where you go to school, where the professors work only an hour a day. The faculty at Pacific-McGeorge are a hard working crew. Perhaps you can clue us into where this luxurious lifestyle exists.

  5. NE2d - April 21, 2007 at 10:46 am

    The “hour a day” was an exaggeration, of course, but I stand by my charge that professors are overpaid and underworked, and live fairly leisurely and privileged lives on the backs of America’s young people. Mr. Lipshaw gets paid for writing that article when his students fork over their tuition checks.

    This is a very sore subject for me and I would like to hear the view from the other side, so I’m trying to keep the tone civil.

  6. Jack - April 21, 2007 at 9:31 pm

    NE2d,

    I’m neither a lawyer nor a law student, so my position might seem strange to a lot of readers here, but I’d have to suggest the crazy idea that law school is optional at best (and for many people the idea of affording a graduate education is iffy or flatly impossible, regardless of abilities or desires). Don’t like paying what it costs, leave, do something else. (I’d also guess tuition prices have a lot more to do with the institution than the professors; how likely do you think it is that most of them are seeing the 5% yearly tuition increases that most universities have been averaging over the last decade?)

    Back to lurk mode

  7. Larry - April 21, 2007 at 11:38 pm

    In successful countries, a large number of people are paid for doing what they enjoy doing. Bakers, bankers, teachers, journalists, fire fighters what have you. The concept is not remotely unique to law professors.

  8. Scott Moss - April 23, 2007 at 1:25 pm

    What’s always amazed me is that this complaint by law students — “our tuition is too high b/c the professors get paid too much and do too little relevant work” — is equally true of (at least high-profile) colleges. Yet college students don’t levy this complaint — and neither do law students levy this complaint about colleges, even though their 4-yr college tuition was about the same as (or more than) their 3-yr law school tuition.

    This leads me to suspect that law students have other reasons for being hostile to their law schools. Why else would they let colleges off the hook but complain so loudly and regularly about law school?

  9. Mar - April 26, 2007 at 10:38 pm

    … These complaining law students… Are they the same ones banking on being overpaid lawyers upon graduation?

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Derek Bambauer
Gabriella Coleman
andré douglas pond cummings
David Gray
Brishen Rogers
Joseph Turow
Elizabeth A. Wilson













Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress