Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

Search


Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

jr_114_9780195367195_bnr

jr_114_9780195383768_bnr

advertise-here4


FC-CO(SS)

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments

    • RJ on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • TJ on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • Christa on Must Law Practice and Scholarship be Exciting?

    • AYY on Privacy and Tattletales

    • Lsat Prep on Improving the US News Rankings: A Wish List

    • Lsat Prep on Fantasy Law School League

    • Legal Fact Finder on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • Observer on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • RJ on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • RJ on Ricci and Briscoe as Disparate Impact Cases

    • Mike Rich on Negligent Corpse Mishandling

    • anon on Privacy and Tattletales

    • orly lobel on At CELS, Hoping to Blog

    • harry brooks on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • RJ on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

  •  

    Site Meter

What I Do For a Living

posted by Nate Oman

Kim’s ruminations on the nature of our profession have got me thinking somewhat less articulate thoughts on being a law professor. I was recently talking with my wife over dinner and she asked me what I had been working on that day. I eagerly replied that I had been researching the legislative history of the Thirteenth Amendment and had found some interesting cases construing apprenticeship agreements under the Northwest Ordinance of 1787. She looked at me somewhat incredulously. I knew what she was thinking.

“You are willing to grant me that teaching students is real work,” I said, “but when I talk about doing my research you think of it as a hobby that I have somehow scammed the Commonwealth of Virginia into paying me for, don’t you?”

“That’s about right,” she said. As near as I can tell, her attitude is shared by virtually all of my family and friends (at least the ones who aren’t professors). It is a wonderful life. I also hasten to add that the legislative history of the Thirteenth Amendment matters a great deal. I am still amazed, however, that I actually get paid for doing what I do.


 April 19, 2007 at 10:46 pm   Posted in: Law School (Scholarship)   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (9)

  1. Brent D - April 20, 2007 at 1:16 am

    Have no fear, there are far greater wastes of tax money than your profession.

  2. NE2d - April 20, 2007 at 12:52 pm

    As a 3L who will be in debt for decades for paying the salaries of people who make a comfortable living working an hour a day, I have to say that the reputation that professors have is richly deserved.

  3. Jeff Lipshaw - April 20, 2007 at 2:56 pm

    Nate, I think your wife has been talking to my wife. Except when I am beaming with pride for having placed an article, she pops the balloon with “so when do you get paid for the articles?”

  4. Miriam Cherry - April 20, 2007 at 5:47 pm

    NE2d, I wonder where you go to school, where the professors work only an hour a day. The faculty at Pacific-McGeorge are a hard working crew. Perhaps you can clue us into where this luxurious lifestyle exists.

  5. NE2d - April 21, 2007 at 10:46 am

    The “hour a day” was an exaggeration, of course, but I stand by my charge that professors are overpaid and underworked, and live fairly leisurely and privileged lives on the backs of America’s young people. Mr. Lipshaw gets paid for writing that article when his students fork over their tuition checks.

    This is a very sore subject for me and I would like to hear the view from the other side, so I’m trying to keep the tone civil.

  6. Jack - April 21, 2007 at 9:31 pm

    NE2d,

    I’m neither a lawyer nor a law student, so my position might seem strange to a lot of readers here, but I’d have to suggest the crazy idea that law school is optional at best (and for many people the idea of affording a graduate education is iffy or flatly impossible, regardless of abilities or desires). Don’t like paying what it costs, leave, do something else. (I’d also guess tuition prices have a lot more to do with the institution than the professors; how likely do you think it is that most of them are seeing the 5% yearly tuition increases that most universities have been averaging over the last decade?)

    Back to lurk mode

  7. Larry - April 21, 2007 at 11:38 pm

    In successful countries, a large number of people are paid for doing what they enjoy doing. Bakers, bankers, teachers, journalists, fire fighters what have you. The concept is not remotely unique to law professors.

  8. Scott Moss - April 23, 2007 at 1:25 pm

    What’s always amazed me is that this complaint by law students — “our tuition is too high b/c the professors get paid too much and do too little relevant work” — is equally true of (at least high-profile) colleges. Yet college students don’t levy this complaint — and neither do law students levy this complaint about colleges, even though their 4-yr college tuition was about the same as (or more than) their 3-yr law school tuition.

    This leads me to suspect that law students have other reasons for being hostile to their law schools. Why else would they let colleges off the hook but complain so loudly and regularly about law school?

  9. Mar - April 26, 2007 at 10:38 pm

    … These complaining law students… Are they the same ones banking on being overpaid lawyers upon graduation?

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove

Website
Understanding Privacy

Kaimipono Wenger

Website
SSRN Page

Dave Hoffman

Website
SSRN Page

Nate Oman

Website
SSRN Page

Frank Pasquale

Website
SSRN Page

Deven Desai

Website
SSRN Page

Danielle Citron

Website
SSRN Page

Lawrence Cunningham

Website
SSRN Page

Sarah Waldeck

Website
SSRN Page

Jaya Ramji-Nogales

Website
SSRN Page

Solangel Maldonado

Website
SSRN Page

Gerard Magliocca

Website
SSRN Page


Guests

Rachel Godsil
Alex Kreit
Anita Krishnakumar
Matthew Sag
Michael Zimmer






Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Ann Bartow
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
David Fagundes
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
John Ip
Kevin Johnson
Dan Kahan
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
David Post
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Susan Scafidi
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Sarah Waldeck
Melissa Waters
Alfred Yen
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Frank Wu
Corey Yung
Jonathan Zittrain

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress