Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

advertise-here4


Slip Opinions


Groundhog Day. (fp)

Banned in Tucson. (kw)

The Best and Worst of 2011 in Race and Law (kw)

Tortured to death for trespassing. (fp)

Drones of contention. (fp)

DOJ still coddling banks. (fp)

Creative destruction? Thank banks. (fp)

Blog about a new book, on how to talk to little girls--stressing smarts not cutes.   LAC

Macey on the heroic Rakoff. (fp)

Captured NY Fed. (fp)


solicitors

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments


    • Car accident claim lawyers on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • Andrew MacKie-Mason on Can't the Supreme Court Just Say No to Cameras?

    • Joe on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Shag from Brookline on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Joe on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • Joe on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Shag from Brookline on Employment Division v. Smith is Wrong

    • G. Calamita on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • Joe on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Howard Wasserman on Can't the Supreme Court Just Say No to Cameras?

    • Gerard Magliocca on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Mike on Super En Banc in the Ninth Circuit

    • Ben on Lifecycles and the Firm

    • Samir Chopra on Symposium Next Week on "A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents"

    • Chris Berry on Who Gets to Keep Trover?
  •  

    Site Meter

    About the Blog

    Concurring Opinions is a multiple authored, general interest legal blog.

    (Image: Wikicommons)

The Path to Part-time Success

posted by Nate Oman

Recently one of my students asked me a question that I am embarrassed to say I don’t know the answer to. Maybe there isn’t one. She explained to me that she would like to work someplace for four or five years, and then go to working part time in order to start a family with her husband. Did I know of any fields of law or career paths which would be more accommodating to these goals? Sadly, I had to confess that my practical exposure to the profession was basically limited to the bill-hundreds-and-hundreds-of-hours-until-you-

make-partner-and-then-bill-hundreds-and-hundreds-more-hours career track. By and large, I enjoyed working at my firm. My colleagues were on the whole pleasant, intelligent, and decent people. On the other hand, I don’t know that I can in good faith advise my student that she ought to head to K Street to achieve her goals (or maybe I should; I’ve no doubt she has the brains and discipline to thrive there). Yet I don’t really know where I would suggest that she go to find her bliss. Suggestions?


 April 2, 2007 at 9:25 am   Posted in: Law Practice   Print This Post Print This Post

Responses (9)

  1. Michael Risch - April 2, 2007 at 9:47 am

    I can think of a few options off the top of my head:

    1. Licensing. Once one has a book of clients, this can be done both part time and remotely. Client sends draft, lawyer revises or comments and sends back.

    2. In-house counsel: At large companies, part time in-house counsel can still offer aid (see licensing above, for example). Many smaller companies might not be able to afford full time in-house counsel, and thus are willing to have part time in-house counsel.

    3. Trademark (and copyright) registration: Because most of the work is ex parte and with long lead times, an attorney can work part time without problem. The same is true with patent prosecution if the technical skills are there.

  2. David - April 2, 2007 at 10:29 am

    I’ve heard these areas of law aren’t hours-intensive and would be amenable to part-time practice:

    1) trusts and estates;

    2) tax; and

    3) employee benefits (counseling, not litigation).

    Similar to in-house, government practice is far more flexible than a private firm. That said, there can be a wide variation in expectations, depending on the particular government office.

  3. Carolyn Elefant - April 2, 2007 at 11:04 am

    I just returned from the Ms. JD conference, http://www.ms-jd.org which is building resources on options for women in the law. Also, check FlexTime Lawyers.

    Part of the problem when you work for others is your schedule is never your own. One of the major problems with law firm part time programs is “hours creep,” where the 35-40 hour schedule turns into 50 hours.

    I have my own practice, which I find is most compatible with part time practice because I can pick and choose my cases and workload. Criminal work is definitely not something that is amenable to part time, but virtually any other cases are. The issue is partly predictabiity, but partly amount. I have always handled 1-2 litigation matters annually as part of my part time repertoire, but more than that would be difficult. In my experience, Appellate work is excellent for part time, you do everything from home except show up for a 15 minute argument one morning. You can also do work on a contract or outsourcing basis for other attorneys. My specialty is regulatory work at FERC,many paper hearings, everything is electronic, very reasonble schedules and great pay because of my experience and the limited nature of the field.

  4. Jim Layton - April 2, 2007 at 11:53 am

    Government offices are great possibilities. In the Missouri Attorney General’s office, we have a number of part-time lawyers. Some have pure part-time schedules, carrying a portion of a caseload. Others “share” a particular job and case load.

    My favorite is the woman who went to half-time after her first child — and worked out an 10 hours at-home/10 hours in-office flextime arrangement with the office and her husband (who also works here) so that one parent was always home. She went down to 10 hours per week total after her second child was born.

    Of course, paying off law school debt may be pretty tough on our salaries.

  5. Deborah Cantrell - April 2, 2007 at 11:55 am

    The Project for Attorney Retention (http://www.pardc.org/) has a great website with information related to work/life balance at different types of legal workplaces. In particular, the Project has looked at how law firms and corporate legal departments handle parttime workers, and the ways in which parttime work can be more successfully utilized.

  6. Jeff Lipshaw - April 2, 2007 at 5:19 pm

    Another possibility to consider is to sign on with a contract lawyer agency that provides fill-in or temporary lawyers. When I was at AlliedSignal, we used such a lawyer to much success (the agency was the Elaine P. Dine Agency in NYC) where we were selling a division and I didn’t want to bring in somebody as an employee either for the short-term or under false pretenses. I think the Wallace Law Registry was another group in Michigan that did this.

  7. mmmbeer - April 3, 2007 at 12:44 pm

    I will take some exception to the suggestion that contract/licensing work is a good field to go part time in. It’s true that if you had a good book of clients that it might be possible to work out an accommodating schedule, however, the successful lawyers that I’m aware of that do similar transactional work tend to get fewer billable hours per hour at work simply because of the nature of the work (lots of fits and starts).

    In addition, the work does not always come with real long lead times. More often than not, it seems that such work comes in with very short deadlines or very anxious clients.

    Finally, depending on the complexity, the negotiating part of that line of work can be pretty time consuming.

  8. yclipse - April 3, 2007 at 5:19 pm

    1. Appellate work

    2. General counsel for a smaller company

  9. anonymous - April 16, 2007 at 3:14 am

    Part time success is easy. Too bad its on a full time job, and the rest of it is failure of varying degrees.

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free


  • « Previous post
  • Next post »

Authors

Daniel J. Solove
Kaimipono Wenger
Dave Hoffman
Frank Pasquale
Deven Desai
Danielle Citron
Lawrence Cunningham
Sarah Waldeck
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Solangel Maldonado
Gerard Magliocca

Guests

Derek Bambauer
Gabriella Coleman
andré douglas pond cummings
David Gray
Brishen Rogers
Joseph Turow
Elizabeth A. Wilson













Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Marvin Ammori
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Taunya Lovell Banks
Ann Bartow
Steven Bellovin
Adam Benforado
Gaia Bernstein
Francesca Bignami
Josh Blackman
Joseph Blocher
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Ryan Calo
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Glenn Cohen
Jennifer Collins
Caroline Mala Corbin
Thomas Crocker
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
Maxine Eichner
Jessica Erickson
David Fagundes
Lisa Fairfax
Joshua Fairfield
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Mary Anne Franks
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Brian Frye
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
Kyle Graham
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jonathan Hafetz
Meredith Harbach
Michelle Harner
Jeffrey Harrison
Hosea Harvey
Erica Hashimoto
Jennifer Hendricks
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Gilbert A. Holmes
Nicole Huberfeld
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
Sherrilyn Ifill
John Ip
Shavar Jeffries
Kevin Johnson
Kristin Johnson
Jeff Jonas
Courtney Joslin
Dan Kahan
Jeffrey Kahn
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Alicia Kelly
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Alex Kreit
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Youngjae Lee
Margaret Lewis
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Matthew Lister
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Kevin Noble Maillard
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Viva Moffat
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Angela Onwuachi-Willing
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
Michael J. Pitts
Marc Poirier
David Post
Amanda Pustilnik
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Marc Roark
Sasha Romanosky
Tuan Samahon
Susan Scafidi
David Schraub
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Judd Sneirson
Adam Steinman
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Olivier Sylvain
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Ari Waldman
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Melissa Waters
Frank Wu
Alfred Yen
Corey Yung
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Michael Zimmer
Jonathan Zittrain

Ownership

Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

Blogroll

Above the Law
Access to Justice
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Derechoalderecho
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Just Books
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
TeachPrivacy Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress