<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jumping the Queue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/04/medical_necessi_1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/04/medical_necessi_1.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Goldberg</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/04/medical_necessi_1.html/comment-page-1#comment-54288</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Goldberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 07:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/04/jumping-the-queue.html#comment-54288</guid>
		<description>Hey Frank,

After Monday, I will have given several talks on &lt;i&gt;Abigail Alliance&lt;/i&gt;, and I agree with Glenn Cohen&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medhumanities.org/2007/02/abigail_allianc.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;perspective&lt;/a&gt; that the scope of the constitutional issue does not exhaust the ethical inquiry.  I&#039;m particularly fascinated by some of the issues relating to the therapeutic misconception, to the notion of informed consent (of what -- purely or mostly unknown risks?), and to the fascinating issues of parens patriae vs. the Millian-style autonomy of the individual to allocate risks to themselves.

Clearly, the case bears watching, and the ethical and policy issues underlying it as well.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Frank,</p>
<p>After Monday, I will have given several talks on <i>Abigail Alliance</i>, and I agree with Glenn Cohen&#8217;s <a href="http://www.medhumanities.org/2007/02/abigail_allianc.html" rel="nofollow">perspective</a> that the scope of the constitutional issue does not exhaust the ethical inquiry.  I&#8217;m particularly fascinated by some of the issues relating to the therapeutic misconception, to the notion of informed consent (of what &#8212; purely or mostly unknown risks?), and to the fascinating issues of parens patriae vs. the Millian-style autonomy of the individual to allocate risks to themselves.</p>
<p>Clearly, the case bears watching, and the ethical and policy issues underlying it as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

