<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Libertarians Against Subjectivism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/04/libertarians_ag.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/04/libertarians_ag.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:22:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick S. O'Donnell</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/04/libertarians_ag.html/comment-page-1#comment-54167</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick S. O'Donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/04/libertarians-against-subjectivism.html#comment-54167</guid>
		<description>Values as such are objective but they have an ineluctable subjective dimension: it is their appreciation, celebration, articulation, instantiation, realization, expression, etc. that is subjective.... Hence, for example, many individuals might realize or express the same value(s) in myriad ways. Philosophers as different as Robert Nozick and Nicholas Rescher have discussed this in some depth.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Values as such are objective but they have an ineluctable subjective dimension: it is their appreciation, celebration, articulation, instantiation, realization, expression, etc. that is subjective&#8230;. Hence, for example, many individuals might realize or express the same value(s) in myriad ways. Philosophers as different as Robert Nozick and Nicholas Rescher have discussed this in some depth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/04/libertarians_ag.html/comment-page-1#comment-54166</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/04/libertarians-against-subjectivism.html#comment-54166</guid>
		<description>The Kitcher article reference is here:

Ethics, Vol. 110, No. 1 (Oct., 1999), pp. 59-83

It&#039;s avaliable on JSTOR for those who have access.  Amazing what google will let you find these days.  It&#039;s well worth the read.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kitcher article reference is here:</p>
<p>Ethics, Vol. 110, No. 1 (Oct., 1999), pp. 59-83</p>
<p>It&#8217;s avaliable on JSTOR for those who have access.  Amazing what google will let you find these days.  It&#8217;s well worth the read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/04/libertarians_ag.html/comment-page-1#comment-54165</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/04/libertarians-against-subjectivism.html#comment-54165</guid>
		<description>For some (to my mind decisive) reasons to be skeptical about the possibility of an &quot;objective and virtue-oriented account of wellbeing&quot; you might like to look at Philip Kitcher&#039;s essay &quot;Essence and Perfection&quot;.  It was mostly a review of Tom Hurka&#039;s book _Perfectionism_ but the critique applies quite generally to the sort of naturalistic account of wellbeing found in Aristotle and his followers.  I don&#039;t have the full citation right now but it was in the journal _Ethics_ some time ago, in the early to mid 90&#039;s I think.  Really first-rate stuff, and pretty devistating to that line of thought, I think.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some (to my mind decisive) reasons to be skeptical about the possibility of an &#8220;objective and virtue-oriented account of wellbeing&#8221; you might like to look at Philip Kitcher&#8217;s essay &#8220;Essence and Perfection&#8221;.  It was mostly a review of Tom Hurka&#8217;s book _Perfectionism_ but the critique applies quite generally to the sort of naturalistic account of wellbeing found in Aristotle and his followers.  I don&#8217;t have the full citation right now but it was in the journal _Ethics_ some time ago, in the early to mid 90&#8217;s I think.  Really first-rate stuff, and pretty devistating to that line of thought, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Goldberg</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/04/libertarians_ag.html/comment-page-1#comment-54164</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Goldberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/04/libertarians-against-subjectivism.html#comment-54164</guid>
		<description>Frank,

I&#039;m not sure I understand why subjectivity in values is such a problem (and I&#039;m trying to understand why you deem virtue-oriented theories to be more &quot;objective&quot;).

Such subjectivity does indeed make policy and moral theory difficult, but whoever said it would be easy? I think the effort to mask the ineluctable subjectivity of value discourse by &quot;objectifying&quot; ethics is one of the most mischievous legacies of modernity.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure I understand why subjectivity in values is such a problem (and I&#8217;m trying to understand why you deem virtue-oriented theories to be more &#8220;objective&#8221;).</p>
<p>Such subjectivity does indeed make policy and moral theory difficult, but whoever said it would be easy? I think the effort to mask the ineluctable subjectivity of value discourse by &#8220;objectifying&#8221; ethics is one of the most mischievous legacies of modernity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick S. O'Donnell</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/04/libertarians_ag.html/comment-page-1#comment-54163</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick S. O'Donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/04/libertarians-against-subjectivism.html#comment-54163</guid>
		<description>Hear! Hear!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear! Hear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
