<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft, Google, and Copyright Scofflaws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/03/microsoft_googl.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/03/microsoft_googl.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack S.</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/03/microsoft_googl.html/comment-page-1#comment-55070</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/03/microsoft-google-and-copyright-scofflaws.html#comment-55070</guid>
		<description>My jaw almost hit the floor when I saw the latest criticisms coming out of Redmond.  When someone gets away with the same intellectual property abuses that MS has been getting away with for years it rubs them the wrong way.  This is a blatant the pot calling the kettle black.

As a parallel note MS&#039;s stance in recent Patent cases against AT&amp;T and others where they argue for weaker patent rights.  If MS were winning the content wars with Google they would no doubt be arguing for weaker copyright protection.

For how Microsoft plays the legal game see z4 v. Microsoft (E.D. Tex. 2006).  Rather disturbing tactics.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My jaw almost hit the floor when I saw the latest criticisms coming out of Redmond.  When someone gets away with the same intellectual property abuses that MS has been getting away with for years it rubs them the wrong way.  This is a blatant the pot calling the kettle black.</p>
<p>As a parallel note MS&#8217;s stance in recent Patent cases against AT&#038;T and others where they argue for weaker patent rights.  If MS were winning the content wars with Google they would no doubt be arguing for weaker copyright protection.</p>
<p>For how Microsoft plays the legal game see z4 v. Microsoft (E.D. Tex. 2006).  Rather disturbing tactics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venkat</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/03/microsoft_googl.html/comment-page-1#comment-55069</link>
		<dc:creator>Venkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/03/microsoft-google-and-copyright-scofflaws.html#comment-55069</guid>
		<description>More than anything, it seems like their timing is awkward.  2 years ago it would have been nice to speak up on this issue - around the time Google announced it book project?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than anything, it seems like their timing is awkward.  2 years ago it would have been nice to speak up on this issue &#8211; around the time Google announced it book project?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

