<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enforcing the Surveillance Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/03/enforcing_the_s.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/03/enforcing_the_s.html</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:18:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/03/enforcing_the_s.html/comment-page-1#comment-55030</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/03/enforcing-the-surveillance-laws.html#comment-55030</guid>
		<description>Only if it meets the Bivens threshold, which requires, among other things, a 4th Amendment violation.  ECPA exists in large part because of Congressional dissatisfaction.  That dissatisfaction arose from the exceedingly narrow scope of 4th Amendment protection (or more accurately, the absence of protection) the Supreme Court has given electronic communications.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only if it meets the Bivens threshold, which requires, among other things, a 4th Amendment violation.  ECPA exists in large part because of Congressional dissatisfaction.  That dissatisfaction arose from the exceedingly narrow scope of 4th Amendment protection (or more accurately, the absence of protection) the Supreme Court has given electronic communications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/03/enforcing_the_s.html/comment-page-1#comment-55029</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/03/enforcing-the-surveillance-laws.html#comment-55029</guid>
		<description>If a private party is aware of a search under an unlawful NSL, can they state a Bivens action?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a private party is aware of a search under an unlawful NSL, can they state a Bivens action?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

